Is the Statistical Advantage Worth the Cost? An Empirical Comparison of KANs and MLPs for Structured Data Classification
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13413v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 03:30:46 GMT
- Title: Is the Statistical Advantage Worth the Cost? An Empirical Comparison of KANs and MLPs for Structured Data Classification
- Abstract summary: This study presents an empirical benchmarking comparison between Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs)<n>We evaluate their out-of-the-box performance on twelve publicly available datasets spanning binary, multiclass, multilabel, and ordinal problems.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This study presents an empirical benchmarking comparison between Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) on structured tabular classification tasks. Motivated by the growing interest in KANs as an alternative function-approximating architecture, we evaluate their out-of-the-box performance on twelve publicly available datasets spanning binary, multiclass, multilabel, and ordinal problems. Both models were trained under standardized preprocessing, architecture, and fixed hyperparameter settings, with performance assessed using test accuracy and F1-Score, paired hypothesis testing, and effect size analysis. Results show that KANs statistically outperform MLPs in binary and multiclass domains and achieve a significant aggregate advantage across all datasets. However, the observed medium effect size (d = -0.46) raises an important cost-benefit consideration: while KANs offer superior generalization through adaptive spline-based mappings, this advantage comes with substantially higher parameter and computational complexity relative to the MLP baseline. These findings suggest KANs are the preferred choice for high-precision applications, while MLPs remain a robust and efficient option for resource-constrained environments. Future work should extend this analysis to additional data modalities to further refine these architectural selection criteria.
Related papers
- Preference Data Selection for Mitigating the Alignment Tax in Large Language Models [52.18310687523229]
BALIGN is a balanced data selection strategy that mitigates catastrophic forgetting while optimizing alignment efficacy.<n>By aggregating three key data-centric features into a unified composite risk score, BALIGN systematically filters out high-risk preference samples.<n>Experiments on standard human preference datasets demonstrate that BALIGN strongly preserves foundational capabilities without compromising alignment gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-25T07:58:42Z) - Multiple-Prediction-Powered Inference [57.30769275944024]
This work provides theoretical guarantees about the minimax optimality, finite-sample performance, and normality of the MultiPPI estimator.<n>We show that MultiPPI consistently achieves lower estimation error than existing baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-28T21:24:00Z) - Kolmogorov Arnold Networks and Multi-Layer Perceptrons: A Paradigm Shift in Neural Modelling [1.6998720690708842]
The research undertakes a comprehensive comparative analysis of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP)<n>KANs utilize spline-based activation functions and grid-based structures, providing a transformative approach compared to traditional neural network frameworks.<n>The proposed study highlights the transformative capabilities of KANs in progressing intelligent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T16:26:49Z) - NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation [58.30936615525824]
We present NAIPv2, a debiased and efficient framework for paper quality estimation.<n> NAIPv2 employs pairwise learning within domain-year groups to reduce inconsistencies in reviewer ratings.<n>It is trained on pairwise comparisons but enabling efficient pointwise prediction at deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T17:59:23Z) - Enhancing Federated Learning with Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Comparative Study Across Diverse Aggregation Strategies [0.24578723416255752]
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KAN) have shown promising capabilities in modeling complex nonlinear relationships.<n>KANs consistently outperform Multilayer Perceptrons in terms of accuracy, stability, and convergence efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T14:56:27Z) - Beyond QA Pairs: Assessing Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Fact Embedding in LLMs [1.6963596661873952]
This paper focuses on improving the fine-tuning process by categorizing question-answer pairs into Factual and Conceptual classes.<n>Two distinct Llama-2 models are fine-tuned based on these classifications and evaluated using larger models like GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini.<n>Our results indicate that models trained on conceptual datasets outperform those trained on factual datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T03:26:30Z) - Incorporating Arbitrary Matrix Group Equivariance into KANs [69.30866522377694]
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have seen great success in scientific domains.<n>We propose Equivariant Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (EKAN) to broaden their applicability to more fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T06:34:58Z) - Revisiting BPR: A Replicability Study of a Common Recommender System Baseline [78.00363373925758]
We study the features of the BPR model, indicating their impact on its performance, and investigate open-source BPR implementations.
Our analysis reveals inconsistencies between these implementations and the original BPR paper, leading to a significant decrease in performance of up to 50% for specific implementations.
We show that the BPR model can achieve performance levels close to state-of-the-art methods on the top-n recommendation tasks and even outperform them on specific datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-21T18:39:53Z) - Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Low-Data Regimes: A Comparative Study with Multilayer Perceptrons [2.77390041716769]
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) use highly flexible learnable activation functions directly on network edges.
KANs significantly increase the number of learnable parameters, raising concerns about their effectiveness in data-scarce environments.
We show that individualized activation functions achieve significantly higher predictive accuracy with only a modest increase in parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T16:56:08Z) - A Benchmarking Study of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks on Tabular Data [14.654403764632594]
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) have been introduced into the world of machine learning, quickly capturing the attention of the entire community.
We present a benchmarking study comparing KANs and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) on datasets.
KANs demonstrate superior or comparable accuracy and F1 scores, excelling particularly in datasets with numerous instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T17:41:34Z) - Minimally Supervised Learning using Topological Projections in
Self-Organizing Maps [55.31182147885694]
We introduce a semi-supervised learning approach based on topological projections in self-organizing maps (SOMs)
Our proposed method first trains SOMs on unlabeled data and then a minimal number of available labeled data points are assigned to key best matching units (BMU)
Our results indicate that the proposed minimally supervised model significantly outperforms traditional regression techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T22:51:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.