UTS at ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff: structural shifts in AI writing bypass state-of-the-art detectors

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13565v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:05:00 GMT
• Title: UTS at ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff: structural shifts in AI writing bypass state-of-the-art detectors
• Abstract summary: We investigate which language model evasion attacks survive state-of-the-art adversarial fine-tuning.<n>We develop strategies that sweep the top 5 positions on the ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff leaderboard.
• Score: 1.348563827917271
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate which language model evasion attacks survive state-of-the-art adversarial fine-tuning, developing strategies that sweep the top 5 positions on the ELOQUENT 2026 Voight-Kampff leaderboard. While adversarial fine-tuning trivially closes the 2025 winning evasion recipes, we uncover a fundamental asymmetry in detector vulnerability: pushing generated text out of the detector's training distribution reliably defeats adversarial detection, whereas pulling it into the distribution (e.g., mimicking human training data) fails completely. Exploiting this, we introduce two novel out-of-distribution attack families - cross-decade register attacks and modernist stream-of-consciousness form. Both strategies easily bypass adversarial closure, achieving up to approximately 50x higher fool rates than previous methods while preserving naturalness. Furthermore, experiments show that the obvious deployer countermeasure (augmenting training data with period prose) fails to close the vulnerability. Our findings show that the tested detector families, including adversarially fine-tuned ones, exhibit persistent vulnerabilities under structural out-of-distribution shifts, a mechanism that directly powers our leading competition performance.

Related papers

• Crushing the Evidence: A Dual-Penalty Evasion Framework for Fooling White-Box Explainable AI Auditors [4.377640147713394]
  Post-hoc model explainers are widely deployed to audit models in high-stakes sensitive domains.<n>A few studies have examined potential attacks in the explainability pipeline.<n>We introduce a more potent white-box, gradient-regularized evasion attack framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-01T10:03:14Z)
• Provable Robustness against Backdoor Attacks via the Primal-Dual Perspective on Differential Privacy [51.758416625168]
  Randomized smoothing is a powerful tool for certifying robustness to adversarial perturbations.<n>We propose a framework for certification of complex, composed mechanisms.<n>We provide a principled and general framework for using composite mechanisms to certify robustness under complex threat models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T22:17:29Z)
• Deepfake detectors are DUMB: A benchmark to assess adversarial training robustness under transferability constraints [0.0]
  We extend the DUMB -- dataset soUrces, Model architecture and Balance - and DUMBer methodology to deepfake detection.<n>We evaluate robustness detectors against adversarial attacks under transferability constraints and cross-dataset configuration.<n>Experiments show that adversarial training strategies reinforce robustness in the in-distribution cases but can also degrade it under cross-dataset configuration depending on the strategy adopted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T18:06:19Z)
• Debiased Dual-Invariant Defense for Adversarially Robust Person Re-Identification [52.63017280231648]
  Person re-identification (ReID) is a fundamental task in many real-world applications such as pedestrian trajectory tracking.<n>Person ReID models are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, where imperceptible perturbations to pedestrian images can cause entirely incorrect predictions.<n>We propose a dual-invariant defense framework composed of two main phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T03:56:40Z)
• A unified Bayesian framework for adversarial robustness [0.4078247440919472]
  We introduce a formal Bayesian framework that models adversarial uncertainty through a channel.<n>This yields two robustification strategies: a proactive defense enacted during training, aligned with adversarial training, and a reactive defense enacted during operations, aligned with adversarial purification.<n>We empirically validate our methodology, showcasing the benefits of explicitly modeling adversarial uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T11:28:30Z)
• GCP: Guarded Collaborative Perception with Spatial-Temporal Aware Malicious Agent Detection [11.336965062177722]
  Collaborative perception is vulnerable to adversarial message attacks from malicious agents.<n>This paper reveals a novel blind area confusion (BAC) attack that compromises existing single-shot outlier-based detection methods.<n>We propose Guarded Collaborative Perception framework based on spatial-temporal aware malicious agent detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T06:03:26Z)
• FaultGuard: A Generative Approach to Resilient Fault Prediction in Smart Electrical Grids [53.2306792009435]
  FaultGuard is the first framework for fault type and zone classification resilient to adversarial attacks. We propose a low-complexity fault prediction model and an online adversarial training technique to enhance robustness. Our model outclasses the state-of-the-art for resilient fault prediction benchmarking, with an accuracy of up to 0.958.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T08:51:23Z)
• Kick Bad Guys Out! Conditionally Activated Anomaly Detection in Federated Learning with Zero-Knowledge Proof Verification [31.38942054994932]
  Federated Learning (FL) systems are susceptible to adversarial attacks.<n>RedJasper is a two-staged anomaly detection method specifically designed for real-world FL deployments.<n>It identifies suspicious activities in the first stage, then activates the second stage conditionally to further scrutinize the suspicious local models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T07:09:05Z)
• Interpretability is a Kind of Safety: An Interpreter-based Ensemble for Adversary Defense [28.398901783858005]
  We propose an interpreter-based ensemble framework called X-Ensemble for robust defense adversary. X-Ensemble employs the Random Forests (RF) model to combine sub-detectors into an ensemble detector for adversarial hybrid attacks defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T04:32:06Z)
• Understanding the Vulnerability of Skeleton-based Human Activity Recognition via Black-box Attack [53.032801921915436]
  Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been employed in a wide range of applications, e.g. self-driving cars. Recently, the robustness of skeleton-based HAR methods have been questioned due to their vulnerability to adversarial attacks. We show such threats exist, even when the attacker only has access to the input/output of the model. We propose the very first black-box adversarial attack approach in skeleton-based HAR called BASAR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T09:51:28Z)
• Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
  We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers. Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods. Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z)
• Provable Defense Against Delusive Poisoning [64.69220849669948]
  We show that adversarial training can be a principled defense method against delusive poisoning. This implies that adversarial training can be a principled defense method against delusive poisoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-09T09:19:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.