The SIGReg Objective as Variational Free Energy: A Theoretical Active-Inference Account of JEPA World Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13612v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 08:59:36 GMT
• Title: The SIGReg Objective as Variational Free Energy: A Theoretical Active-Inference Account of JEPA World Models
• Abstract summary: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are the dominant design for latent world models.<n>We show that the choice of anti-collapse regulariser determines whether a JEPA's training objective, a prediction loss plus a weighted embedding regulariser, is a valid Active Inference (AIF) variational free energy.
• Score: 47.471225029744424
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are the dominant design for latent world models, yet they are usually justified by empirical performance rather than a normative principle. We show that the choice of anti-collapse regulariser determines whether a JEPA's training objective, a prediction loss plus a weighted embedding regulariser, is a valid Active Inference (AIF) variational free energy. We organise four non-contrastive regularisers (VICReg, LogDet, PairDist, and SIGReg) into an entropy-estimator hierarchy indexed by a prior-miscalibration gap, and show that the gap's sign, whether the estimator bounds the latent entropy from above or below, decides whether the AIF surprise bound survives: VICReg and LogDet are unsafe upper bounds, PairDist a safe lower bound, and SIGReg eliminates the gap. We then prove a correspondence theorem: under the standard constant-noise encoder model and successful SIGReg enforcement (isotropic-Gaussian embeddings), the gap vanishes, the objective becomes an exact information bottleneck, the surprise bound is preserved, and the latent goal cost becomes an exact proxy for AIF pragmatic value, whereas VICReg leaves an irreducible second-order anisotropy term. We extend the correspondence to multi-step expected free energy, ensemble epistemic value, and a learned-policy regime, and we identify the one AIF term no current JEPA world model computes: the state-epistemic value, a future-state coverage signal. The predictions differ in kind, not degree, and are stated here as theoretical consequences left for empirical test in separate work; full proofs are in Appendix A, and the algebraic core of every result is machine-verified in Lean 4 (Appendix D).

Related papers

• Orthogonal JEPA: Factorized Predictive States for Latent World Models [95.20158869896393]
  We introduce method, a latent world-modeling framework based on predictive factorization.<n>We show that method can allocate redundant capacity to dominant signals while providing weak or conflicting gradients to less dominant predictive structure.<n>Experiments on controlled vision, single-cell transcriptomics, longitudinal health records, continuous control, and molecular dynamics evaluate representation quality, forecasting, planning, and long-horizon stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T13:59:57Z)
• Closing the Null Space: Guidance-Aware Quantization for Classifier-Free Diffusion [0.0]
  Two-pass CFG execution pattern imposes a latency overhead that parameter-count and bit-operation metrics conceal entirely.<n>Guidance-Aware Mixed Precision (GAMP) is proposed, which calibrates directly on the guided prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-09T08:42:07Z)
• The Matching Principle: A Geometric Theory of Loss Functions for Nuisance-Robust Representation Learning [0.5854803320592717]
  We prove optimality in a linear-Gaussian model (Thm. A), necessity of range coverage for any quadratic penalty that zeros deployment drift (Thm. G)<n>Thirteen blocks (ML through Qwen2.5-7B) test matched vs isotropic vs wrong-direction penalties on geometry and deployment drift.<n>We claim a falsifiable design recipe: estimate Sigma_task, match Sigma', run the controls, report task and geometry separately.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-21T17:53:28Z)
• Structural Rigidity and the 57-Token Predictive Window: A Physical Framework for Inference-Layer Governability in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Current AI safety relies on behavioral monitoring and post-training alignment.<n> empirical measurement shows these approaches produce no detectable pre-commitment signal.<n>We present an energy-based governance framework connecting transformer inference dynamics to constraint-satisfaction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-04T00:08:17Z)
• Score-Guided Proximal Projection: A Unified Geometric Framework for Rectified Flow Editing [1.0312968200748118]
  Rectified Flow models achieve state-of-the-art generation quality, yet controlling them for precise tasks remains a challenge.<n>Current approaches bifurcate into inversion-based guidance, which suffers from "geometric locking"<n>We propose Score-Guided Proximal Projection, a unified framework that bridges the gap between deterministic optimization and contraction sampling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T23:44:45Z)
• The Procrustean Bed of Time Series: The Optimization Bias of Point-wise Loss [53.542743390809356]
  This paper aims to provide a first-principles analysis of the Expectation of Optimization Bias (EOB)<n>Our analysis reveals a fundamental paradigm paradox: the more deterministic and structured the time series, the more severe the bias by point-wise loss function.<n>We present a concrete solution that simultaneously achieves both principles via DFT or DWT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-21T06:08:22Z)
• Causal Inference as Distribution Adaptation: Optimizing ATE Risk under Propensity Uncertainty [0.0]
  We reframing ATE estimation as a textitdomain adaptation problem under distribution shift.<n>We propose the textbfJoint Robust Estimator (JRE) to train outcome models jointly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T21:40:46Z)
• Normalized Attention Guidance: Universal Negative Guidance for Diffusion Models [57.20761595019967]
  We present Normalized Attention Guidance (NAG), an efficient, training-free mechanism that applies extrapolation in attention space with L1-based normalization and refinement.<n>NAG restores effective negative guidance where CFG collapses while maintaining fidelity.<n>NAG generalizes across architectures (UNet, DiT), sampling regimes (few-step, multi-step), and modalities (image, video)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T13:30:46Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)
• Robust and Adaptive Temporal-Difference Learning Using An Ensemble of Gaussian Processes [70.80716221080118]
  The paper takes a generative perspective on policy evaluation via temporal-difference (TD) learning. The OS-GPTD approach is developed to estimate the value function for a given policy by observing a sequence of state-reward pairs. To alleviate the limited expressiveness associated with a single fixed kernel, a weighted ensemble (E) of GP priors is employed to yield an alternative scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-01T23:15:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.