Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13801v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:08:19 GMT
- Title: Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detection
- Abstract summary: We present Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing (TA-RS) for intrusion detection systems.<n>It is a certified defense that injects Gaussian noise exclusively into the controllable (DC) subspace.<n>It achieves 55-100% certified accuracy on two datasets.
- Score: 1.4915002678801434
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language model (LLM)-based intrusion detection systems (IDS) are increasingly studied for security monitoring, yet their robustness against feasible traffic manipulation remains largely empirical. We present Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing (TA-RS), a classifier-agnostic certified defense that injects Gaussian noise exclusively into the directly controllable (DC) subspace -- features a remote attacker can modify -- during both fine-tuning and certification, aligning the smoothing distribution with the attacker-controllable subspace. We identify a critical prerequisite: applying standard randomized smoothing to clean-trained LLM-IDS yields weak certified accuracy in three of four (model, dataset) pairs tested (14-33%, at or below random) and only 57% in the fourth (43 pp below the noise-augmented result); noise-augmented fine-tuning recovers to 68-100% on two of three benchmark datasets (at sigma=0.25). At the L_inf-equivalent threshold R_inf = epsilon*sqrt(|DC|) (epsilon=0.05), TA-RS achieves 55-100% certified accuracy on CIC-IDS-2018 and HIKARI-2021, with median certified radii (R approx 0.45-0.96) exceeding R_inf by 1.8-5x (across sigma=0.25-1.00). Against a fairly trained iso-trained RS baseline the residual advantage is dataset-dependent (4-19 pp on CIC-IDS-2018). The larger gap -- up to 72 pp against an isotropic RS baseline that shares the DC-noise-augmented training recipe -- primarily reflects the training-certification mismatch rather than DC alignment alone: isotropic test-time noise perturbs uncontrollable features the attacker cannot exploit, triggering abstention rates up to 68%. RT-IoT2022 probes the limits of the method: it fails under the default fine-tuning recipe but recovers to 76%/69% certified accuracy (LLaMA3-8B/Qwen3-8B) when noise augmentation is increased.
Related papers
- From Inaudible Inputs to Model Failures: Low-Frequency Safety Risks in LALMs [46.76277198630859]
Large audio-language models (LALMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in understanding diverse audio inputs.<n>This diversity includes low-frequency signals that are inaudible to humans but can still enter the model and influence its generation.<n>We propose Intermittent Low-Frequency Lockout (ILL), an inaudible red teaming method that evaluates this risk using a universal waveform template in a black box setting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T06:09:50Z) - Adaptive Finite-Budget Training for CVaR Risk-Aware Q-Learning [7.373349445059511]
Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives.<n>This paper proposes an adaptive training controller for Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) RaQL and evaluates it on a daily Bitcoin trading task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T00:26:22Z) - Cybersecurity Detection Classification with Reasoning-enabled Language Models [50.72675435043546]
A major issue in Security Operations Centers (SOCs) is alert fatigue.<n>Prior work prompts or fine-tunes large language models (LLMs) to emit a triage label directly, but does not train them to reason about whether a detection is a genuine threat.<n>We train a chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning-enabled triage classifier on real, human-labeled Windows endpoint detections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T16:22:13Z) - Delay-Aware Active Triangulation with Uncertainty-Driven Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Counter-UAS [5.4271995156436965]
Multi-agent active visual triangulation enables precise 3D localization of aerial targets by coordinating mobile observers with controllable cameras.<n>We present a delay-aware, uncertainty-driven multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for target localization in Counter-UAS applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T07:58:13Z) - When Can Conformal Risk Control Certify LLM Outputs? Bounds, Impossibility, and Adaptation for Structured Generation [0.11280931253550518]
Large language models (LLMs) deployed for structured generation (NER, extraction, QA, and classification) lack formal reliability guarantees.<n>We characterize when conformal risk control (CRC) can certify structured LLM outputs and when it provably cannot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-27T19:25:07Z) - Calibration Without Comprehension: Diagnosing the Limits of Fine-Tuning LLMs for Vulnerability Detection in Systems Software [1.0026496861838445]
CWE-Trace is a framework for vulnerability detection built from 834 manually curated Linux kernel samples.<n>We evaluate eight vanilla LLMs and 15 LoRA fine-tuned variants across non-targeted detection, targeted detection, and CWE classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-18T17:19:26Z) - Online Shift Detection and Conformal Adaptation for Deployed Safety Classifiers [0.0]
We present an online monitoring system for distributional shift in deployed safety classifiers.<n>After detection, a conformal abstention layer adapts decision to recover a target error.<n>The system achieves 86.6% detection with mean latency of 39.5800 steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T11:24:25Z) - Rethinking Noise-Robust Training for Frozen Vision Foundation Models: A Cross-Dataset Benchmark with a Case Study of Small-Loss Failure [7.512887610816016]
Frozen Vision Foundation Models (VFMs) with lightweight classification heads are increasingly used in medical imaging.<n>We present a benchmark of eight noisy-label methods across five medical datasets, three backbones, two noise types, and five noise rates.<n>We conclude with evidence-based guidance and a low-regret feature-space selector for practical recommendation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T15:02:44Z) - Distributional Energy-Based Models for Uncertainty-Aware Structured LLM Reasoning [40.342912574072024]
Large Language Models produce structured outputs such as travel plans or code solutions.<n>Individual reasoning steps may appear correct while the output as a whole violates budgets, fails test cases, or contradicts earlier deductions.<n>We propose a learned quality scorer with deterministic analytical constraint penalties for verifying structured LLM outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-15T17:08:27Z) - From Black Box to Glass Box: Cross-Model ASR Disagreement to Prioto Review in Ambient AI Scribe Documentation [43.148402136307716]
Cross-model disagreement among heterogeneous ASR systems can act as a reference-free uncertainty signal.<n>We transcribed 50 publicly available medical audio clips with eight ASR systems spanning commercial APIs and open-source engines.<n>Low-agreement regions were enriched for content disagreements, with the content fraction increasing from 53.9% to 73.9% across quintiles of high-risk mass.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-02T13:02:13Z) - Conformal Lesion Segmentation for 3D Medical Images [82.92159832699583]
We propose a risk-constrained framework that calibrates data-driven thresholds via conformalization to ensure the test-time FNR remains below a target tolerance.<n>We validate the statistical soundness and predictive performance of CLS on six 3D-LS datasets across five backbone models, and conclude with actionable insights for deploying risk-aware segmentation in clinical practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-19T08:21:00Z) - Patch-Level Contrasting without Patch Correspondence for Accurate and
Dense Contrastive Representation Learning [79.43940012723539]
ADCLR is a self-supervised learning framework for learning accurate and dense vision representation.
Our approach achieves new state-of-the-art performance for contrastive methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T07:38:09Z) - (Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free! [116.6052628829344]
We certify 71% accuracy on ImageNet under adversarial perturbations constrained to be within a 2-norm of 0.5.
We obtain these results using only pretrained diffusion models and image classifiers, without requiring any fine tuning or retraining of model parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T17:27:27Z) - Second-Order Provable Defenses against Adversarial Attacks [63.34032156196848]
We show that if the eigenvalues of the network are bounded, we can compute a certificate in the $l$ norm efficiently using convex optimization.
We achieve certified accuracy of 5.78%, and 44.96%, and 43.19% on 2,59% and 4BP-based methods respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-01T05:55:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.