Adaptive Finite-Budget Training for CVaR Risk-Aware Q-Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04305v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:26:22 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Finite-Budget Training for CVaR Risk-Aware Q-Learning
• Abstract summary: Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives.<n>This paper proposes an adaptive training controller for Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) RaQL and evaluates it on a daily Bitcoin trading task.
• Score: 7.373349445059511
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Risk-aware Q-learning (RaQL) provides a model-free, two-timescale estimator for dynamic risk objectives, but its finite-budget behavior remains fragile: fixed inner-loop hyperparameters can produce unstable value estimates, persistent Bellman residuals, and inefficient sample reuse. This paper proposes an adaptive training controller for Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) RaQL and evaluates it on a daily Bitcoin trading task. The controller preserves the original CVaR estimator and Bellman fixed point; instead, it redesigns the training procedure through six coordinated mechanisms: per-cell inner-step sizing, outer-rate-matched decay synchronization, a short early correction for the VaR-like inner variable, a coverage-first-then-greedy sample allocation rule, progressive suffix aggregation of mature inner estimates, and data-driven calibration of key scales from online-observable quantities. Across 20 random seeds and 856,000 inner-transition samples, the controller reduces the mean empirical CVaR Bellman residual by approximately 85% relative to the fixed-parameter baseline (MeanBEQ: 1.2202 to 0.1854; MeanBEV: 1.1624 to 0.0535) and maintains stability across CVaR levels, discount factors, and training budgets. On the chronological out-of-sample test set, the learned policy attains a Sharpe ratio of 0.9281 with a maximum drawdown of 6.46% after transaction costs. Although buy-and-hold yields a higher cumulative return (35.43% vs. 23.61%), the adaptive policy achieves far lower volatility (9.57% vs. 47.93%), drawdown, and CVaR loss. These results demonstrate that adaptive finite-budget training design, applied solely to the training procedure without altering the risk objective, can materially improve the reliability and risk-adjusted performance of risk-aware Q-learning in financial applications.

Related papers

• SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute [62.3458279176813]
  Self-Verifying Refinement is an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework.<n>It learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy.<n>It achieves a macro-average accuracy of 0.563 with only 2.99 inference turns on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T16:20:58Z)
• Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing for LLM-Based Network Intrusion Detection [1.4915002678801434]
  We present Traffic-Aware Randomized Smoothing (TA-RS) for intrusion detection systems.<n>It is a certified defense that injects Gaussian noise exclusively into the controllable (DC) subspace.<n>It achieves 55-100% certified accuracy on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T13:08:19Z)
• When Can Conformal Risk Control Certify LLM Outputs? Bounds, Impossibility, and Adaptation for Structured Generation [0.11280931253550518]
  Large language models (LLMs) deployed for structured generation (NER, extraction, QA, and classification) lack formal reliability guarantees.<n>We characterize when conformal risk control (CRC) can certify structured LLM outputs and when it provably cannot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-27T19:25:07Z)
• Sharpness Aware Surrogate Training for Spiking Neural Networks [0.0]
  Surrogate gradients are a standard tool for training spiking neural networks (SNNs)<n>But conventional hard forward or surrogate backward training couples a nonsmooth forward model with a biased estimator.<n>We apply sharpness aware Surrogate Training (SAST), which applies sharpness aware contractionmization (SAM) to surrogate forward SNN trained by backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-14T01:26:26Z)
• $V_{0.5}$: Generalist Value Model as a Prior for Sparse RL Rollouts [81.48669089692189]
  Generalist Value Models (such as $V_0.5$) achieve pre-trained value estimation by explicitly encoding model capabilities in-context.<n>We propose $V_0.5$, which adaptively fuses the baseline predicted by such value model with the empirical mean derived from sparse rollouts.<n>$V_0.5$ significantly outperforms GRPO and DAPO, achieving faster convergence and over some 10% performance improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T14:57:41Z)
• Calibrated Credit Intelligence: Shift-Robust and Fair Risk Scoring with Bayesian Uncertainty and Gradient Boosting [0.0]
  Calibrated Credit Intelligence (CCI) is a deployment-oriented framework for risk scoring.<n>CCI produces risk scores that are accurate, reliable, and more equitable under realistic deployment conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T04:40:18Z)
• ODAR: Principled Adaptive Routing for LLM Reasoning via Active Inference [60.958331943869126]
  ODAR-Expert is an adaptive routing framework that optimize the accuracy-efficiency trade-off via principled resource allocation.<n>We show strong and consistent gains, including 98.2% accuracy on MATH and 54.8% on Humanity's Last Exam.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T05:22:01Z)
• VI-CuRL: Stabilizing Verifier-Independent RL Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Variance Reduction [55.04308051033549]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a dominant paradigm for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>We introduceVerifier-Independent Curriculum Reinforcement Learning (VI-CuRL), a framework that leverages the model's intrinsic confidence to construct a curriculum independent from external verifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T03:40:52Z)
• Safe Langevin Soft Actor Critic [10.683491090059867]
  We introduce Safe Langevin Soft Actor-Critic (SL-SAC) to balance reward and safety in constrained reinforcement learning.<n>We show that SL-SAC achieves the lowest cost in 7 out of 10 tasks while maintaining competitive returns.<n>On Safety-Gymnasium, SL-SAC achieves cost reductions of 19-63% in velocity tasks compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T08:06:35Z)
• Human-in-the-loop Online Rejection Sampling for Robotic Manipulation [55.99788088622936]
  Hi-ORS stabilizes value estimation by filtering out negatively rewarded samples during online fine-tuning.<n>Hi-ORS fine-tunes a pi-base policy to master contact-rich manipulation in just 1.5 hours of real-world training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T11:53:08Z)
• Decision from Suboptimal Classifiers: Excess Risk Pre- and Post-Calibration [52.70324949884702]
  We quantify the excess risk incurred using approximate posterior probabilities in batch binary decision-making.<n>We identify regimes where recalibration alone addresses most of the regret, and regimes where the regret is dominated by the grouping loss.<n>On NLP experiments, we show that these quantities identify when the expected gain of more advanced post-training is worth the operational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T10:52:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.