Budgeted Subset Refinement for Execution-Aware LLM Research Ideation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14118v1
• Date: Sat, 09 May 2026 14:54:36 GMT
• Title: Budgeted Subset Refinement for Execution-Aware LLM Research Ideation
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) can generate research ideas that appear novel to expert reviewers, but recent work also shows that such ideas often lack diversity.<n>This paper evaluates a controlled proxy benchmark for a pre-execution scaffolding problem.<n>We introduce Budgeted Subset Refinement, a family of strategies that refine only a selected subset of candidates.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can generate research ideas that appear novel to expert reviewers, but recent work also shows that such ideas often lack diversity, are difficult for LLMs to evaluate reliably, and may fail to translate into strong executed projects. This paper evaluates a controlled proxy benchmark for a pre-execution scaffolding problem: given a noisy pool of LLM-generated research ideas, how should a system allocate limited refinement effort to construct a stronger, more diverse, more execution-aware portfolio for human researchers under a fixed rubric? We introduce Budgeted Subset Refinement, a family of strategies that refine only a selected subset of candidates rather than refining all candidates uniformly. In a unified shared-candidate-pool evaluation across 10 random seeds and 10 research-ideation environments, raw generation and reranking alone produce no research-strong nonduplicate ideas under the benchmark rubric, while refinement is necessary for strong proxy-rated portfolios. Uniform refinement produces strong individual ideas but is not the best portfolio-level allocation of compute. Random-k refinement is a strong low-cost baseline, while diversity-aware MMR-k refinement gives the best overall proxy tradeoff: the highest research-strong nonduplicate yield, the lowest duplicate rate among successful methods, and the best cost per research-strong nonduplicate idea. A blinded external-judge robustness check on a balanced 72-item sample supports the broad refinement effect across independent model families, while showing that per-item rankings among refined strategies vary by judge. These results suggest that LLM research ideation systems should be evaluated not only as idea generators, but as budgeted support-allocation systems. The claims are scoped to proxy-rated portfolio quality and do not substitute for expert review or execution-grounded validation.

Related papers

• UniRRM: Unified Reasoning Reward Models Across Languages and Evaluation Paradigms [61.47798381713363]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) excels on tasks with verifiable rewards, but in open-ended tasks, the reliability of reward models remains a key challenge.<n>Recent works on generative reward models offer a promising alternative, but they remain constrained by static evaluation criteria, fragmented evaluation paradigms, and limited multilingual support.<n>We propose textbfUniRRM, a unified reasoning reward model supporting multiple languages and evaluation paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T06:05:12Z)
• LigBench: A Unified and Human-Aligned Benchmark for LLM-based Research Idea Generation [36.122822391024755]
  LigBench is an automated evaluation benchmark that enables fine-grained and reliable evaluation of AI research ideas.<n>P PAIR-IQ is a dataset tailored for training pairwise idea judgment models.<n>Experiments demonstrate that LigBench achieves stable and interpretable evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-13T12:11:23Z)
• Janus: An Algorithm-Evaluator Co-Evolution Framework for LLM-Driven Discovery under Expensive Evaluation Budgets [56.93233495754078]
  We introduce Janus, a framework that uses LLMs to co-evolve target programs and executable proxy evaluators.<n>To address label scarcity, Janus leverages domain knowledge encoded in LLMs to generate task-specific evaluator programs.<n>To mitigate distribution shift, Janus evolves evaluators alongside target programs, selects them using a promotion-aligned objective, and maintains region-conditioned portfolios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T15:31:12Z)
• ResearchStudio-Idea: An Evidence-Grounded Research-Ideation Skill Suite from ML Conference Outcomes [34.230808196436676]
  We present ResearchStudio-Idea as a reusable skill suite for this first mile of research ideation.<n>The suite includes Paper-Search, a standalone multi-source literature search skill; Scoop-Check, a standalone prior-art collision checker for novelty claims.<n>IdeaSpark is the end-to-end skill that composes evidence grounding, pattern-guided generation, collision retrieval, audit, and idea-card rendering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-05T17:59:43Z)
• Designing Reward Signals for Portable Query Generation: A Case Study in Industrial Semantic Job Search [8.82040111147814]
  We present an end-to-end RLAIF framework to generate emphportable search queries.<n>This task introduces a highly adversarial reward surface where policy optimization exploits flaws in rubrics, resulting in verbatim-copying behaviors.<n>We show that introducing a rule-based reward floor to correct for rewards assigned to verbatim copying degenerates this failure mode, resulting in a substantial $+0.147$ quality improvement on a cross-family evaluation judge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-25T17:09:12Z)
• TRACE: A Unified Rollout Budget Allocation Framework for Efficient Agentic Reinforcement Learning [52.67756371231985]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is a promising approach for enhancing reasoning and agentic behavior in large language models.<n>We introduce Tree Rollout Allocation for Contrastive Exploration (TRACE), a unified rollout allocation framework.<n>Technically, TRACE allocates rollout budget to both prompt roots and intermediate prefixes that are most likely to yield mixed terminal rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T17:16:03Z)
• Chain of Uncertain Rewards with Large Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [52.48243762705385]
  Chain of Uncertain Rewards (CoUR) is a novel framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) to streamline reward function design and evaluation.<n>We show that CoUR achieves better performance and significantly lowers the cost of reward evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T05:44:14Z)
• Large language models for post-publication research evaluation: Evidence from expert recommendations and citation indicators [2.952559770088323]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for automated research evaluation based on textual content.<n>This study examines whether LLMs can support post-publication peer review tasks by benchmarking their outputs against expert judgments and citation-based indicators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T11:32:18Z)
• Evaluating LLM-Based Grant Proposal Review via Structured Perturbations [18.689211845609623]
  We develop a perturbation-based framework probing LLM sensitivity across six quality axes.<n>We compare three review architectures: single-pass review, section-by-section analysis, and a 'Council of Personas' ensemble emulating expert panels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T11:53:50Z)
• LLMs Can Assist with Proposal Selection at Large User Facilities [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) can enhance the proposal selection process at large user facilities.<n>LLMs provide a scalable, consistent, and cost-effective alternative to traditional human review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T18:23:56Z)
• J1: Incentivizing Thinking in LLM-as-a-Judge via Reinforcement Learning [54.85131761693927]
  We introduce J1, a reinforcement learning framework for teaching LLM judges to think before making decisions.<n>Our core contribution lies in converting all judgment tasks for non-verifiable and verifiable prompts into a unified format with verifiable rewards.<n>We then use RL to train thinking-judges at scales of 8B, 32B, and 70B and show that they obtain state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T14:05:15Z)
• A Minimalist Approach to LLM Reasoning: from Rejection Sampling to Reinforce [68.99924691391048]
  We revisit GRPO from a reinforce-like algorithm perspective and analyze its core components.<n>We find that a simple rejection sampling baseline, RAFT, yields competitive performance than GRPO and PPO.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Reinforce-Rej, a minimal extension of policy gradient that filters both entirely incorrect and entirely correct samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T16:15:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.