Quantize with Confidence? An Empirical Study of Quantization for Code Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14181v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 14:05:33 GMT
• Title: Quantize with Confidence? An Empirical Study of Quantization for Code Generation
• Abstract summary: We empirically evaluate six state-of-the-art quantization methods (GPTQ, AWQ, QuIP#, AQLM, BitsAndBytes, and GGUF) on two representative large code model families.<n>We assess functional correctness (pass@1) together with maintainability, reliability, security, and structural complexity.<n>Results show that quantization techniques differ meaningfully in their impact on correctness and code quality.
• Score: 4.347703075408796
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing adoption of local inference frameworks such as Ollama has made it increasingly common for developers to run large code models on laptops and other resource-constrained hardware. In these settings, post-training quantization is essential for reducing memory footprint and enabling practical deployment, yet its impact on generated code remains insufficiently understood. We empirically evaluate six state-of-the-art quantization methods (GPTQ, AWQ, QuIP#, AQLM, BitsAndBytes, and GGUF) on two representative large code model families, Qwen2.5-Coder and CodeLlama, using the multilingual McEval and CoderEval benchmarks for Python and Java. We assess functional correctness (pass@1) together with maintainability, reliability, security, and structural complexity. We also introduce a novel analysis of robustness under varying prompt complexity, characterized by Shannon entropy and token length. Our results show that quantization techniques differ meaningfully in their impact on correctness and code quality. AQLM consistently matches or exceeds the full-precision baseline, whereas QuIP# exhibits the largest correctness degradation, particularly on complex prompts. Security attributes remain stable across models, benchmarks, and programming languages, while robustness to prompt complexity varies across techniques. These findings provide practical guidance for selecting quantization strategies for deploying large code models on resource-constrained hardware and highlight the importance of evaluating quantized models beyond functional correctness.

Related papers

• LFQ: Logit-aware Final-block Quantization for Boosting the Generation Quality of Low-Bit Quantized LLMs [52.1276403258812]
  We introduce Logit-aware Final-block Quantization (LFQ), a simple yet effective enhancement to block-wise PTQ.<n>LFQ consistently improves the accuracy of complex generation tasks over state-of-the-art block-wise PTQ.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T11:02:23Z)
• Adaptive Decoding via Test-Time Policy Learning for Self-Improving Generation [0.5199807441687141]
  We introduce a reinforcement learning-based sampler that treats decoding as sequential decision-making and learns a lightweight policy to adjust sampling parameters at test-time.<n>We evaluate summarization datasets including BookSum, arXiv, and WikiHow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T02:44:42Z)
• LLMs in Code Vulnerability Analysis: A Proof of Concept [0.3441021278275805]
  Traditional software security analysis methods struggle to keep pace with the scale and complexity of moderns.<n>This paper explores the incorporation of code-specific and general-purpose Large Language Models to automate critical software security tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-13T16:16:11Z)
• Learning Grouped Lattice Vector Quantizers for Low-Bit LLM Compression [57.54335545892155]
  We introduce a Grouped Lattice Vector Quantization (GLVQ) framework that assigns each group of weights a customized lattice codebook.<n>Our approach achieves a better trade-off between model size and accuracy compared to existing post-training quantization baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T20:19:48Z)
• Is Quantization a Deal-breaker? Empirical Insights from Large Code Models [7.182449176083625]
  We apply Activation-aware Weight Quantization (AWQ) to two widely used code models, CodeLlama and DeepSeekCoder, to generate Java and Python code.<n>Our findings reveal that quantization is a robust technique that not only preserves functional correctness, but also retains key qualitative code attributes sought after by developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T14:58:19Z)
• Training Language Models to Generate Quality Code with Program Analysis Feedback [66.0854002147103]
  Code generation with large language models (LLMs) is increasingly adopted in production but fails to ensure code quality.<n>We propose REAL, a reinforcement learning framework that incentivizes LLMs to generate production-quality code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T17:57:47Z)
• An Efficient Quantum Classifier Based on Hamiltonian Representations [50.467930253994155]
  Quantum machine learning (QML) is a discipline that seeks to transfer the advantages of quantum computing to data-driven tasks.<n>We propose an efficient approach that circumvents the costs associated with data encoding by mapping inputs to a finite set of Pauli strings.<n>We evaluate our approach on text and image classification tasks, against well-established classical and quantum models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-13T11:49:53Z)
• Quantize What Counts: More for Keys, Less for Values [63.51476878610841]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) suffer inference-time memory bottlenecks dominated by the attention Key-Value ( KV) cache.<n>This paper proposes two theorems that anchor mixed-precision KV quantization in the intrinsic geometry of Transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T22:24:27Z)
• QSpec: Speculative Decoding with Complementary Quantization Schemes [53.960146187821685]
  Quantization is widely adopted to accelerate inference and reduce memory consumption in large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose QSpec, a novel quantization paradigm that decouples efficiency from quality.<n>QSpec reuses both weights and KV cache across stages, enabling near-zero-cost switching without retraining or auxiliary models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T05:57:51Z)
• LeanQuant: Accurate and Scalable Large Language Model Quantization with Loss-error-aware Grid [36.33062038680275]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown immense potential across various domains. Post-training quantization has emerged as a promising technique to reduce memory requirements and decoding latency. We propose LeanQuant, a novel quantization method that is accurate, versatile, and scalable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T00:23:51Z)
• LLMC: Benchmarking Large Language Model Quantization with a Versatile Compression Toolkit [55.73370804397226]
  Quantization, a key compression technique, can effectively mitigate these demands by compressing and accelerating large language models. We present LLMC, a plug-and-play compression toolkit, to fairly and systematically explore the impact of quantization. Powered by this versatile toolkit, our benchmark covers three key aspects: calibration data, algorithms (three strategies), and data formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T11:49:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.