Disclosure Divergence: Measuring Privacy Policy and Data Safety Misalignment at Scale

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14442v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:34:01 GMT
• Title: Disclosure Divergence: Measuring Privacy Policy and Data Safety Misalignment at Scale
• Abstract summary: We measure per-app and per-category consistency and introduce a sensitivity-weighted risk score that emphasizes high-risk data types.<n>We find that misalignment disproportionately affects sensitive categories such as personal information and device identifiers, with sharing disclosures exhibiting lower consistency than collection disclosures.<n>Our findings highlight structural gaps in current disclosure mechanisms and underscore the need for stronger verification and greater transparency in platform-level privacy reporting.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the rapid growth of mobile applications, user data privacy has become an increasing concern. While privacy policies describe how apps collect and share data, platforms such as Google Play provide Data Safety labels intended to summarize these practices. Because these disclosure channels are declared separately, they may present inconsistent representations of app data practices, creating uncertainty for users and regulators. In this work, we conducted a large-scale empirical study of disclosure consistency across 6,051 Android apps. Using an LLM-based extraction framework and a unified schema over 14 Google Play data categories and two operations (collection and sharing), we measure per-app and per-category consistency and introduce a sensitivity-weighted risk score that emphasizes high-risk data types. We find that misalignment disproportionately affects sensitive categories such as personal information and device identifiers, with sharing disclosures exhibiting lower consistency than collection disclosures. Elevated privac risk is concentrated in app categories associated with persistent monitoring and communication. Overall, our findings highlight structural gaps in current disclosure mechanisms and underscore the need for stronger verification and greater transparency in platform-level privacy reporting.

Related papers

• Phantoms and Disclosures: a Causal Framework for Auditing Synthetic Data [56.86147283213652]
  We present a customizable empirical auditing framework designed to detect and explain data disclosures.<n>Our framework introduces a mechanism to distinguish between "true disclosures"-where the system directly reproduces a user's information-and "phantom disclosures"-where the system incidentally generates a user's data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-15T16:54:02Z)
• PrivSTRUCT: Untangling Data Purpose Compliance of Privacy Policies in Google Play Store [7.8875412433566465]
  We introduce PrivSTRUCT, a novel and systematic encoder and decoder combined framework that untangles complex privacy disclosures.<n>By applying PrivSTRUCT to a large-scale dataset of 3,756 Android apps, we uncover a critical transparency gap.<n>Alarmingly, we find that sensitive third-party data flows are frequently diluted and entangled into generic or unrelated categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T02:12:11Z)
• An Empirical Analysis of Google Play Data Safety Disclosures: A Consistency Study of Privacy Indicators in Mobile Gaming Apps [0.40611352512781873]
  This study investigates the consistency between developer-reported Data Safety disclosures and observable privacy indicators extracted from Android Application Packages (APKs)<n>The results revealed varying levels of agreement across privacy categories.<n>These findings highlight limitations in the reliability of current marketplace transparency mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T04:50:21Z)
• PrivPRISM: Automatically Detecting Discrepancies Between Google Play Data Safety Declarations and Developer Privacy Policies [8.052271364177988]
  Self-declared disclosures often contradict the full privacy policies, deceiving users about actual data practices.<n>We introduce PrivPRISM, a robust framework that combines encoder and decoder language models to extract and compare fine-grained data practices from privacy policies.<n>Our findings expose systemic issues, including widespread reuse of generic privacy policies, vague / contradictory statements, and hidden risks in high-profile apps with 100M+ downloads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-10T05:33:40Z)
• DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspective [70.77570343385928]
  We introduce a novel taxonomy, classifying existing methods based on their reliance on internal features (IF) (inherent to the data) versus external features (EF) (artificially introduced for auditing)<n>We formulate two primary attack types: evasion attacks, designed to conceal the use of a dataset, and forgery attacks, intending to falsely implicate an unused dataset.<n>Building on the understanding of existing methods and attack objectives, we further propose systematic attack strategies: decoupling, removal, and detection for evasion; adversarial example-based methods for forgery.<n>Our benchmark, DATABench, comprises 17 evasion attacks, 5 forgery attacks, and 9
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T03:07:15Z)
• Beyond Jailbreaking: Auditing Contextual Privacy in LLM Agents [43.303548143175256]
  This study proposes an auditing framework for conversational privacy that quantifies an agent's susceptibility to risks.<n>The proposed Conversational Manipulation for Privacy Leakage (CMPL) framework is designed to stress-test agents that enforce strict privacy directives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T20:47:37Z)
• A False Sense of Privacy: Evaluating Textual Data Sanitization Beyond Surface-level Privacy Leakage [77.83757117924995]
  We propose a new framework that evaluates re-identification attacks to quantify individual privacy risks upon data release.<n>Our approach shows that seemingly innocuous auxiliary information can be used to infer sensitive attributes like age or substance use history from sanitized data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T01:16:27Z)
• User Interaction Data in Apps: Comparing Policy Claims to Implementations [0.0]
  We analyzed the top 100 apps across diverse categories using static analysis methods to evaluate the alignment between policy claims and implemented data collection techniques. Our findings highlight the lack of transparency in data collection and the associated risk of re-identification, raising concerns about user privacy and trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T12:11:11Z)
• On the Universal Adversarial Perturbations for Efficient Data-free Adversarial Detection [55.73320979733527]
  We propose a data-agnostic adversarial detection framework, which induces different responses between normal and adversarial samples to UAPs. Experimental results show that our method achieves competitive detection performance on various text classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T02:54:07Z)
• On Deep Learning with Label Differential Privacy [54.45348348861426]
  We study the multi-class classification setting where the labels are considered sensitive and ought to be protected. We propose a new algorithm for training deep neural networks with label differential privacy, and run evaluations on several datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T15:09:06Z)
• Deep Directed Information-Based Learning for Privacy-Preserving Smart Meter Data Release [30.409342804445306]
  We study the problem in the context of time series data and smart meters (SMs) power consumption measurements. We introduce the Directed Information (DI) as a more meaningful measure of privacy in the considered setting. Our empirical studies on real-world data sets from SMs measurements in the worst-case scenario show the existing trade-offs between privacy and utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-20T13:41:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.