Does generative AI supersede supervised XMLC? A Benchmark Study on Automated Subject Indexing with German Scientific Literature

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14882v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 11:56:20 GMT
• Title: Does generative AI supersede supervised XMLC? A Benchmark Study on Automated Subject Indexing with German Scientific Literature
• Abstract summary: In this study, we apply a selection of specialised supervised XMLC methods to the test case of subject indexing contemporary German scientific literature.<n>A challenge for all methods is to reliably make suggestions from the long tail of the subject vocabulary.<n>We find that supervised XMLC algorithms relying on transformer-based dense features give best results in terms of overall binary relevance metrics.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With a large controlled vocabulary as the label set, the task of automated subject indexing in a library can be understood as a multi-label classification task. If the set of subject terms is large, the problem fits the Extreme Multi-Label Classification (XMLC) objective. In this study, we apply a selection of specialised supervised XMLC methods to the test case of subject indexing contemporary German scientific literature, collected at the German National Library (DNB). We contrast these results by including a classical lexical matching baseline and three of our own recently developed LLM-based methods into the benchmark. Algorithms are evaluated and compared in several metrics. This includes binary relevance comparisons with previously indexed material, as well as graded relevance ratings by professional subject librarians. A challenge for all methods is to reliably make suggestions from the long tail of the subject vocabulary. We find that supervised XMLC algorithms relying on transformer-based dense features give best results in terms of overall binary relevance metrics. However, focusing on graded relevance and performance in the long tail of our subject vocabulary, the LLM-based generative methods give better results, making them a promising alternative for future productive use.

Related papers

• AgenticTagger: Structured Item Representation for Recommendation with LLM Agents [58.12004213978182]
  AgenticTagger is a framework that queries LLMs for representing items with sequences of text descriptors.<n>To effectively and efficiently ground vocabulary in the item corpus of interest, we design a multi-agent reflection mechanism.<n>Experiments on public and private data show AgenticTagger brings consistent improvements across diverse recommendation scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:01:37Z)
• From Quotes to Concepts: Axial Coding of Political Debates with Ensemble LMs [3.7765376220172393]
  We operationalize axial coding with large language models (LLMs)<n>We convert lengthy transcripts into compact, hierarchically structured codes and categories.<n>To support future research, we publicly release the full dataset of utterances and codes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T13:20:31Z)
• Sorting the Babble in Babel: Assessing the Performance of Language Detection Algorithms on the OpenAlex Database [1.0124625066746598]
  This project aims to compare various language classification procedures, procedures combining various Python language detection algorithms and metadata-based corpora extracted from manually-annotated articles sampled from the OpenAlex database.<n>Following an analysis of precision and recall performance for each algorithm, corpus, and language as well as of processing speeds recorded for each algorithm and corpus type, overall procedure performance at the database level was simulated.<n>Results show that procedure performance strongly depends on the importance given to each of the measures implemented.<n>It is hoped that these results help confirm and foster the unparalleled potential of the OpenAlex database for cross-linguistic, bibliometric-
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T21:29:09Z)
• ClassEval-T: Evaluating Large Language Models in Class-Level Code Translation [19.69195067838796]
  We construct a class-level code translation benchmark, ClassEval-T, and make the first attempt to extensively assess recent LLMs' performance on class-level code translation.<n>It cost us 360 person-hours to accomplish the manual migration to Java and C++ with complete code samples and associated test suites.<n> Experimental results demonstrate a remarkable performance drop compared with the most widely studied method-level code translation benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T11:13:14Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Ungrammatical-syntax-based In-context Example Selection for Grammatical Error Correction [8.655807096424732]
  In this paper, we propose a novel ungrammatical-syntax-based in-context example selection strategy for grammatical error correction. Specifically, we measure similarity of sentences based on their syntactic structures with diverse algorithms, and identify optimal ICL examples sharing the most similar ill-formed syntax to the test input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T10:05:57Z)
• Automatic Smart Contract Comment Generation via Large Language Models and In-Context Learning [11.52122354673779]
  In this study, we propose an approach SCCLLM based on large language models (LLMs) and in-context learning. Specifically, in the demonstration selection phase, SCCLLM retrieves the top-k code snippets from the historical corpus. In the in-context learning phase, SCCLLM utilizes the retrieved code snippets as demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T08:31:09Z)
• T3L: Translate-and-Test Transfer Learning for Cross-Lingual Text Classification [50.675552118811]
  Cross-lingual text classification is typically built on large-scale, multilingual language models (LMs) pretrained on a variety of languages of interest. We propose revisiting the classic "translate-and-test" pipeline to neatly separate the translation and classification stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:33:22Z)
• Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model [58.64141622176841]
  We propose Listwise Reranker with a Large Language Model (LRL), which achieves strong reranking effectiveness without using any task-specific training data. Experiments on three TREC web search datasets demonstrate that LRL not only outperforms zero-shot pointwise methods when reranking first-stage retrieval results, but can also act as a final-stage reranker.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T14:45:34Z)
• On the Usefulness of Embeddings, Clusters and Strings for Text Generator Evaluation [86.19634542434711]
  Mauve measures an information-theoretic divergence between two probability distributions over strings. We show that Mauve was right for the wrong reasons, and that its newly proposed divergence is not necessary for its high performance. We conclude that -- by encoding syntactic- and coherence-level features of text, while ignoring surface-level features -- such cluster-based substitutes to string distributions may simply be better for evaluating state-of-the-art language generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T17:58:49Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• XL-WiC: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Semantic Contextualization [98.61159823343036]
  We present the Word-in-Context dataset (WiC) for assessing the ability to correctly model distinct meanings of a word. We put forward a large multilingual benchmark, XL-WiC, featuring gold standards in 12 new languages. Experimental results show that even when no tagged instances are available for a target language, models trained solely on the English data can attain competitive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T15:32:00Z)
• Rank over Class: The Untapped Potential of Ranking in Natural Language Processing [8.637110868126546]
  We argue that many tasks which are currently addressed using classification are in fact being shoehorned into a classification mould. We propose a novel end-to-end ranking approach consisting of a Transformer network responsible for producing representations for a pair of text sequences. In an experiment on a heavily-skewed sentiment analysis dataset, converting ranking results to classification labels yields an approximately 22% improvement over state-of-the-art text classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T22:18:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.