OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14989v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:38:07 GMT
• Title: OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniaBench, a benchmark for evaluating general agents across diverse scenarios with explicit state spaces.<n>We construct executable environments and synthesize single-turn and multi-turn tasks through four complementary routes.<n>The bench presents substantial challenges to current frontier models, with even Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol achieving Overall Pass@1 scores of only 58.54 and 57.14, respectively.
• Score: 25.68270661401607
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction. However, existing agent benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, tool ecosystems, or interaction formats, making it difficult to systematically characterize model capabilities across heterogeneous application settings. We introduce OmniaBench, a benchmark for evaluating general agents across diverse scenarios with explicit state spaces. We derive application-oriented scenario knowledge from app stores, product documents, industry resources, Web retrieval, and human refinement, forming a hierarchical taxonomy that spans ToC, ToB and ToE with 90 level-1 and 354 level-2 domains. Based on this taxonomy, we construct executable environments and synthesize single-turn and multi-turn tasks through four complementary routes: DAG, DAG-S, Solver, and Program. OmniaBench further introduces a ten-dimensional capability taxonomy and eight compositional atomic difficulty factors to support fine-grained evaluation and analysis. The resulting dataset contains 1,431 tasks, together with a challenging subset of 644 tasks designed to reduce evaluation cost and mitigate potential contamination of the full set after public release. The bench presents substantial challenges to current frontier models, with even Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol achieving Overall Pass@1 scores of only 58.54 and 57.14, respectively. Further analyses reveal clear differences across domains and capabilities, as well as persistent limitations in planning, constraint maintenance, and adaptive correction. OmniaBench provides a broad and diagnostic benchmark for characterizing the capability boundaries of general agents.

Related papers

• AgentOmnia: Scaling Agentic Models for Full-Scenario Applications [36.656762500581216]
  Large language model agents have advanced rapidly, yet progress remains fragmented across domains, capabilities, task difficulty, and interaction settings.<n>We frame this as full-scenario agentic scaling and present Agent Omnia, a framework coordinating task-space definition, data synthesis, post-training, evaluation, and improvement across To-Consumer (ToC), To-Business (ToB), and To-Employee (ToE) applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-25T09:58:24Z)
• T1-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-Scenario Agents in Real-World Domains [17.617235861426686]
  T1-Bench is a high-fidelity, comprehensive benchmark for evaluating agentic systems in realistic customer-facing, multi-domain environments.<n>We evaluate T1-Bench using 12 proprietary and open-weight models, providing a standardized framework for assessing agent behavior, tool utilization, and conversational quality.<n>To facilitate future research on agentic systems, we will publicly release data and evaluation code as open source.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T16:32:14Z)
• SpatialWorld: Benchmarking Interactive Spatial Reasoning of Multimodal Agents in Real-World Tasks [73.92333717662558]
  SpatialWorld is a benchmark for evaluating the interactive spatial understanding of multimodal agents in complex real-world tasks.<n>It features 760 human-annotated tasks across diverse domains (e.g., household routines, travel, social collaboration)<n>For reliable evaluation, each task includes a human-validated initial state, a reference trajectory, and a terminal-state verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T15:51:51Z)
• Scaling Agentic Capabilities via Grounded Interaction Synthesis [12.796216573698677]
  We introduce Grounded Agentic Interaction Synthesis (GAIS), a framework that automates the scalable construction of diverse environments and complex tasks.<n>Specifically, we construct protocol-anchored environments derived from real-world Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers to ensure functional diversity and difficulty.<n>Experiments on BFCL, $2$-Bench, and ACEBench demonstrate that GAIS-synthesized data significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T09:57:52Z)
• OccuBench: Evaluating AI Agents on Real-World Professional Tasks via Language Environment Simulation [57.505743202759646]
  OccuBench is a benchmark covering 100 real-world professional task scenarios across 10 industry categories and 65 specialized domains.<n>Our multi-agent synthesis pipeline automatically produces evaluation instances with guaranteed solvability, calibrated difficulty, and document-grounded diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T00:27:32Z)
• CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints [66.87622847854337]
  We introduce CCTU, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) under complex constraints.<n>The benchmark comprises 200 carefully curated and challenging test cases across diverse tool-use scenarios.<n>We develop an executable constraint validation module that performs step-level validation and enforces compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-16T14:05:13Z)
• AIDABench: AI Data Analytics Benchmark [62.45908988324612]
  AIDABench is a benchmark for evaluating AI systems on complex data analytics tasks in an end-to-end manner.<n>AIDABench encompasses 600+ diverse document analysis tasks across three core capability dimensions: question answering, data visualization, and file generation.<n>We evaluate 11 state-of-the-art models on AIDABench, spanning both proprietary (e.g., Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3 Pro Preview) and open-source (e.g., Qwen3-Max-2026-01-23-Thinking) families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T08:58:05Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains [54.117238759317004]
  Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark features comprehensive offline tasks that eliminate the need for complex environment setups. It evaluates models across five domains, including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. With a total of 20 meticulously designed tasks encompassing over 3K distinct prompts, MMAU provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating the strengths and limitations of LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T00:58:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.