Some Large Language Models Exhibit Consistent Risk Attitudes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16197v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2026 16:11:48 GMT
• Title: Some Large Language Models Exhibit Consistent Risk Attitudes
• Abstract summary: We test whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic and consistent risk attitudes under uncertainty.<n>Using regression models, we extract each agents belief-to-decision mapping and quantify risk sensitivity and risk attitude bias.
• Score: 14.534723442159008
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As artificial intelligence systems are deployed in open-ended, high-stakes settings, a critical dimension remains unmeasured: how perceived risk is translated into action. We test whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic and consistent risk attitudes under uncertainty. We introduce a cross-domain framework that decouples contextual risk belief from categorical decision, and apply it to six representative LLMs and 100 human participants across spatial navigation, clinical triage, and financial allocation tasks. Using regression models, we extract each agents belief-to-decision mapping and quantify risk sensitivity and risk attitude bias. We find that most tested LLMs exhibit (i) robust intra-task consistency, indicating stable mappings from contextual belief to risk decision within a fixed task domain; (ii) cross-domain rank-order stability, preserving relative risk posture across tasks; and (iii) a convergence toward a restricted risk-attitude distribution relative to the broader human baseline. These results reveal risk attitude as a stable and previously uncharacterized dimension of LLM behavior, establishing a foundation for evaluating and aligning AI systems in open-ended decision-making and motivating further investigation into the origins of these intrinsic behavioral dispositions.

Related papers

• Behavioural Signatures of Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making in Large Language Models [121.70781851874035]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in decision support.<n>It is important to understand whether their choices under uncertainty exhibit stable and interpretable behavioural regularities.<n>Here we examine this question using a controlled multi-model framework based on no-limit Texas Hold'em.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-11T10:33:39Z)
• Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
  Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Vision-based Risk Object Identification via Conformal Risk Tube Prediction [7.840136094141999]
  Existing approaches make decisions and ignore uncertainty, which could lead to safety-critical failures.<n>Despite these challenges, current methods lack principled framework to model risk uncertainty jointly across space and time.<n>We propose Conformal Risk Prediction unified formulation that captures principled risk uncertainty, provides coverage guarantees for true risks, and produces calibrated risk scores with uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-25T04:13:42Z)
• The Shadow Self: Intrinsic Value Misalignment in Large Language Model Agents [37.75212140218036]
  We formalize the Loss-of-Control risk and identify the previously underexamined Intrinsic Value Misalignment (Intrinsic VM)<n>We then introduce IMPRESS, a scenario-driven framework for systematically assessing this risk.<n>We evaluate Intrinsic VM on 21 state-of-the-art LLM agents and find that it is a common and broadly observed safety risk across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T07:09:50Z)
• RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration [81.38705556267917]
  Existing safety evaluation methods for large language models (LLMs) suffer from inherent limitations.<n>We introduce a theoretical framework that reconstructs the underlying risk concept space.<n>We propose RADAR, a multi-agent collaborative evaluation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-28T09:35:32Z)
• Unveiling Trust in Multimodal Large Language Models: Evaluation, Analysis, and Mitigation [51.19622266249408]
  MultiTrust-X is a benchmark for evaluating, analyzing, and mitigating the trustworthiness issues of MLLMs.<n>Based on the taxonomy, MultiTrust-X includes 32 tasks and 28 curated datasets.<n>Our experiments reveal significant vulnerabilities in current models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T09:00:01Z)
• RiskNet: Interaction-Aware Risk Forecasting for Autonomous Driving in Long-Tail Scenarios [6.024186631622774]
  RiskNet is an interaction-aware risk forecasting framework for autonomous vehicles.<n>It integrates deterministic risk modeling with probabilistic behavior prediction for comprehensive risk assessment.<n>It supports real-time, scenario-adaptive risk forecasting and demonstrates strong generalization across uncertain driving environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T02:36:54Z)
• Answer, Refuse, or Guess? Investigating Risk-Aware Decision Making in Language Models [63.559461750135334]
  Language models (LMs) are increasingly used to build agents that can act autonomously to achieve goals.<n>We study this "answer-or-defer" problem with an evaluation framework that systematically varies human-specified risk structures.<n>We find that a simple skill-decomposition method, which isolates the independent skills required for answer-or-defer decision making, can consistently improve LMs' decision policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T09:16:26Z)
• Navigating the Risks: A Survey of Security, Privacy, and Ethics Threats in LLM-Based Agents [67.07177243654485]
  This survey collects and analyzes the different threats faced by large language models-based agents. We identify six key features of LLM-based agents, based on which we summarize the current research progress. We select four representative agents as case studies to analyze the risks they may face in practical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T15:40:04Z)
• One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning [25.218430053391884]
  We propose risk-sensitivity as a mechanism to jointly address both of these issues. Risk-aversion to aleatoric uncertainty discourages actions that may result in poor outcomes due to environmentity. Our experiments show that our algorithm achieves competitive performance on deterministic benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T21:24:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.