Monte Carlo Dropout Uncertainty and Entropy-Thresholded Selective Prediction for Architecture-Agnostic Brain Tumor MRI Triage

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16317v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 06:21:17 GMT
• Title: Monte Carlo Dropout Uncertainty and Entropy-Thresholded Selective Prediction for Architecture-Agnostic Brain Tumor MRI Triage
• Abstract summary: This study proposes an uncertainty-first pipeline for four-class brain tumor MRI.<n>It reads predictive uncertainty from Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout over T = 20 passes and turns the resulting entropy into an explicit rule for deferring uncertain cases to a radiologist.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Deep networks now subtype brain tumors on MRI about as well as specialist readers, yet accuracy is not what keeps them out of the clinic. What matters at the point of care is whether a model's confidence can be trusted to flag the cases it is likely to misclassify and defer them to a human. Deterministic estimates cannot: an auxiliary confidence head trained alongside the classifier collapses to a near-constant output that says nothing about correctness. This study proposes an uncertainty-first pipeline for four-class brain tumor MRI (glioma, meningioma, pituitary, no tumor) that reads predictive uncertainty from Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout over T = 20 passes and turns the resulting entropy into an explicit rule for deferring uncertain cases to a radiologist. We partitioned 7,200 images by perceptual-hash cluster, closing the near-duplicate leakage that inflates accuracy under naive splitting, and evaluated the pipeline on ViT-B/16 and ResNet-50 across five seeds along three axes: discrimination, calibration, and selective prediction. Both discriminate strongly (macro-AUC 0.994; accuracy 0.962 and 0.964), and no seed separates them (0 of 5 significant, p < 0.05), so the result is driven by the uncertainty pipeline, not the network. A single temperature scalar pulls the deterministic softmax into tight calibration (expected calibration error 0.016-0.020), and deferring the most uncertain 5% of cases lifts accuracy on the rest to about 0.98 on both (area under the risk-coverage curve 0.010-0.011). MC-Dropout uncertainty here is thus calibrated, non-collapsing, and directly actionable through a concrete deferral rule, providing an architecture-agnostic basis for calibrated, defer-to-human brain tumor MRI triage under internal validation.

Related papers

• Bayesian uncertainty estimation improves clinical decision making in medical AI agents [3.251669068529209]
  We show that Monte Carlo dropout provides an uncertainty signal that tracks generalisation across training-set scales and flags confident yet error-prone predictions.<n>In a controlled 2x2 factorial experiment, a clinical-decision-support agent exploited this uncertainty only when it was delivered as a binary error-risk flag rather than as raw scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T11:54:23Z)
• Trustworthy Medical Segmentation: Uncertainty-Aware U-Net Evaluation Under Clinical Image Degradation [0.0]
  We present a framework for evaluating uncertainty-aware segmentation under clinical degradation.<n>We measure segmentation accuracy, calibration, failure detection, and selective prediction coverage.<n>These results argue for uncertainty-aware inference as a practical safety layer in physician-in-the-loop radiology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-22T06:35:33Z)
• EnTrust: Modeling Inter-Modal Conflict for Trustworthy Multimodal Medical Image Analysis [41.67522319355107]
  EnTrust is a framework that treats inter-modal conflict as the primary source of predictive uncertainty.<n>It achieves state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy while reducing calibration error by 40% compared to the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-19T12:43:50Z)
• Confidence is Not Reliability: Rethinking MC Dropout in Brain Tumour Segmentation [2.104759809264928]
  A segmentation model that fails silently on treatment-critical sub-regions represents a patient safety risk.<n>We ask whether voxel-level uncertainty estimation via Monte Carlo (MC) Dropout can reliably identify segmentation errors.<n>We evaluate a high-performance pretrained SegResNet and a locally trained UNet with residual units.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-17T17:24:41Z)
• Calibration, Uncertainty Communication, and Deployment Readiness in CKD Risk Prediction: A Framework Evaluation Study [0.0]
  Machine learning models for chronic kidney disease often post strong discrimination scores on internal test sets.<n>We trained five classifiers on the UCI CKD dataset (400 patients, 62.5% CKD prevalence)<n>We evaluated each across calibration quality, conformal prediction coverage, and an eight-criterion deployment readiness framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-20T17:12:48Z)
• Predictive Entropy Links Calibration and Paraphrase Sensitivity in Medical Vision-Language Models [2.064612766965483]
  We show five uncertainty quantification methods on MedGemma 4BIT across in distribution MIMIC CXR and outof distribution PadChest chest X ray datasets, with cross architecture validation on LLaVA RAD7B.<n>For well calibrated single model methods, predictive entropy from one forward pass predicts which samples will flip under rephrasing AUROC 0.711 on MedGemma, 0.878 on LLaVARAD p 10 4, enabling a single entropy threshold to flag both unreliable and sensitive predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T04:18:47Z)
• Enhancing Neuro-Oncology Through Self-Assessing Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Unified Model for MRI Segmentation [1.3909388235627789]
  Deep learning has advanced on benchmarks, but two issues limit clinical use: no uncertainty estimates for errors and no segmentation of healthy brain structures around tumors for surgery.<n>This study presents an uncertainty-aware framework augmenting nnUNet with a channel for voxel-wise uncertainty.<n>For whole-brain context, a unified model combines normal and cancer datasets, achieving a DSC of 0.81 for brain structures and 0.86 for tumor, with robust key-region performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T22:13:45Z)
• An Empirical Study on MC Dropout--Based Uncertainty--Error Correlation in 2D Brain Tumor Segmentation [0.0]
  This study empirically examines the relationship between MC Dropout--based uncertainty and segmentation error in 2D brain tumor MRI segmentation.<n>Findings suggest that MC Dropout uncertainty provides limited cues for boundary error localization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T11:19:44Z)
• Unified Uncertainty Calibration [43.733911707842005]
  We introduce emphunified uncertainty calibration (U2C), a holistic framework to combine aleatoric and uncertainty uncertainties. U2C enables a clean learning-theoretical analysis of uncertainty estimation, and outperforms reject-or-classify across a variety of ImageNet benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T13:42:36Z)
• Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by Modeling Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [57.023423137202485]
  Concerns regarding the reliability of medical image segmentation persist among clinicians.<n>We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.<n>By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for medical image segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z)
• Deterministic Neural Networks with Appropriate Inductive Biases Capture Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty [91.01037972035635]
  We show that a single softmax neural net with minimal changes can beat the uncertainty predictions of Deep Ensembles. We study why, and show that with the right inductive biases, softmax neural nets trained with maximum likelihood reliably capture uncertainty through the feature-space density.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T09:44:09Z)
• Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation of Learned Variational MRI Reconstruction [63.202627467245584]
  We introduce a Bayesian variational framework to quantify the model-immanent (epistemic) uncertainty. We demonstrate that our approach yields competitive results for undersampled MRI reconstruction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T18:08:14Z)
• Localization Uncertainty Estimation for Anchor-Free Object Detection [48.931731695431374]
  There are several limitations of the existing uncertainty estimation methods for anchor-based object detection. We propose a new localization uncertainty estimation method called UAD for anchor-free object detection. Our method captures the uncertainty in four directions of box offsets that are homogeneous, so that it can tell which direction is uncertain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T13:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.