JOR-Bench: Japanese Operations Research Benchmarks for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16777v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 11:24:10 GMT
• Title: JOR-Bench: Japanese Operations Research Benchmarks for Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: JOR-Bench is a collection of five Japanese-language benchmarks for evaluating the ability of large language models.<n>JOR-Bench is a solver-independent benchmark that can be used with any programming language.
• Score: 16.295305195753723
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present JOR-Bench, a collection of five Japanese-language benchmarks for evaluating the ability of large language models (LLMs) to formulate and solve operations research (OR) problems. Each benchmark is a Japanese translation of an existing English benchmark: IndustryOR, MAMO Complex LP, NL4OPT, OptiBench, and OptMATH, covering 1,319 problems spanning linear programming, mixed-integer programming, non-linear programming, and combinatorial optimization. JOR-Bench is a solver-independent benchmark that can be used with any solver or programming language, and consists of pairs of Japanese problem statements and expected numerical answers. We evaluate seven LLMs, including multilingual general-purpose models and Japanese-specialized models, on both the original English and the new Japanese versions, and compare performance across languages. For the main evaluation, we standardize execution with the Python interface to OR-Tools to make model outputs comparable and reproducible with open-source software. Our results show that OR formulation ability is largely language-neutral for strong multilingual models; the overall average accuracy difference between English and Japanese is only $-0.3$ pp. Yet error analysis reveals subtle cross-lingual differences, including a pragmatic disambiguation failure in some domains that causes models to output decision-variable values instead of the objective value when the prompt is in Japanese.

Related papers

• Evaluating Language Models on Cross-Language Code Functional Equivalence [6.76025470599609]
  We introduce PolyHuman, a dataset of human-written programs in CPP, Java, and Python.<n>Using this dataset, we evaluate intra- and inter-language equivalence detection across open-weight and proprietary LLMs.<n>We analyze 81 cases of systematic disagreement in which models incorrectly judge functional equivalence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T01:41:00Z)
• The Best Programming Language for Tokenmaxxing: An Investigation of Coding Agent Behavior Across Programming Languages [13.509521852529728]
  We evaluate five recent models on programming problems in Python, Java, Rust, and OCaml.<n>We show that there can be stark variation in token consumption that is consistent across models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T16:41:59Z)
• Asm2SrcEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Assembly-to-Source Code Translation [4.45354703148321]
  Assembly-to-source code translation is a critical task in reverse engineering, cybersecurity, and software maintenance.<n>We present the first comprehensive evaluation of five state-of-the-art large language models on assembly-to-source translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T12:40:30Z)
• UA-Code-Bench: A Competitive Programming Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Code Generation in Ukrainian [0.42970700836450487]
  This paper introduces UA-Code-Bench, a new open-source benchmark established for a thorough evaluation of language models' code generation and competitive programming problem-solving abilities in Ukrainian.<n>The benchmark comprises 500 problems from the Eolymp platform, evenly distributed across five complexity levels from very easy to very hard.<n>The obtained results reveal that even top-performing models, such as OpenAI o3 and GPT-5, solve only half of the problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T07:24:56Z)
• Evaluating Robustness of Large Language Models Against Multilingual Typographical Errors [45.37878669586302]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in multilingual, real-world applications with user inputs.<n>Most benchmarks assume clean input, leaving the robustness of LLMs to typos largely underexplored.<n>We introduce MulTypo, a multilingual typo generation algorithm that simulates human-like errors based on language-specific keyboard layouts and typing behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T16:49:12Z)
• A Multi-Language Object-Oriented Programming Benchmark for Large Language Models [61.267115598083315]
  A survey of 35 existing benchmarks uncovers three major imbalances.<n>85.7% focus on a single programming language.<n>94.3% target only function-level or statement-level tasks.<n>Over 80% include fewer than ten test cases on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T11:30:08Z)
• CRUXEval-X: A Benchmark for Multilingual Code Reasoning, Understanding and Execution [50.1875460416205]
  The CRUXEVAL-X code reasoning benchmark contains 19 programming languages.<n>It comprises at least 600 subjects for each language, along with 19K content-consistent tests in total.<n>Even a model trained solely on Python can achieve at most 34.4% Pass@1 in other languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T11:43:00Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts.<n>We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion.<n>We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug [62.424077000154945]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on code generation. We propose Self- Debugging, which teaches a large language model to debug its predicted program via few-shot demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T10:43:43Z)
• Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models [82.7357812992118]
  We present new benchmarks on evaluation code generation models: MBXP and Multilingual HumanEval, and MathQA-X. These datasets cover over 10 programming languages. We are able to assess the performance of code generation models in a multi-lingual fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T17:17:06Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multilingual Machine Translation [94.51866646879337]
  We propose a new learning objective for Multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) based on distributionally robust optimization. We show how to practically optimize this objective for large translation corpora using an iterated best response scheme. Our method consistently outperforms strong baseline methods in terms of average and per-language performance under both many-to-one and one-to-many translation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T03:48:35Z)
• Program Synthesis with Large Language Models [40.41120807053989]
  We evaluate large language models for program synthesis in Python. We find that synthesis performance scales log-linearly with model size. We find that even our best models are generally unable to predict the output of a program given a specific input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T03:57:30Z)
• KLEJ: Comprehensive Benchmark for Polish Language Understanding [4.702729080310267]
  We introduce a comprehensive multi-task benchmark for the Polish language understanding, accompanied by an online leaderboard. We also release HerBERT, a Transformer-based model trained specifically for the Polish language, which has the best average performance and obtains the best results for three out of nine tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T21:55:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.