Informal Learning Emerges in Everyday Human-LLM Interaction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17643v2
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:55:21 GMT
• Title: Informal Learning Emerges in Everyday Human-LLM Interaction
• Abstract summary: We show that everyday human-LLM interaction contains measurable, selective and conditionally organized behavioural signatures of informal learning.<n>They shift AI evaluation from answer-delivery efficiency toward the preservation of cognitive opportunities for users to reason, test ideas and construct understanding.
• Score: 74.53081471113929
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As LLMs become increasingly capable of completing tasks for users, a central concern is that everyday AI use may become primarily cognitive offloading, eroding the opportunities through which people develop their own capabilities. We analyse large-scale human-LLM conversations to ask whether informal learning behaviors also emerge in this setting: whether users engage in exchanges in ways that preserve opportunities to learn. Across 128,569 naturalistic conversations, we translated learning-science constructs into turn-level behavioural signatures. Cognitive engagement, users' cognitive effort as reflected in the exchange, appeared in 31.9% of 491,685 user turns, whereas constructive engagement, the deepest observable form of learning-oriented engagement, appeared in 4.9%, showing that deeper sense-making was recurrent but selective. Our study further identifies factors associated with these forms of engagement. Scaffolded assistant support consistently marked richer constructive participation, with associations varying by user framing, task ecology, support form, timing and prior user state. Together, these findings show that everyday human-LLM interaction is not only answer delivery or cognitive offloading; it also contains measurable, selective and conditionally organized behavioural signatures of informal learning. They shift AI evaluation from answer-delivery efficiency toward the preservation of cognitive opportunities for users to reason, test ideas and construct understanding in the course of everyday problem-solving.

Related papers

• Disrupting Cognitive Passivity: Rethinking AI-Assisted Data Literacy through Cognitive Alignment [17.265229093607676]
  We argue that disrupting cognitive passivity requires more dynamic and adaptive strategy through cognitive alignment.<n>In the framework, we provide the mapping between AI's interaction mode (transmissive or deliberative) and users' cognitive demand (receptive or deliberative)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-03T06:47:55Z)
• Safeguarding Privacy: Privacy-Preserving Detection of Mind Wandering and Disengagement Using Federated Learning in Online Education [53.25191965774678]
  We propose a framework exploiting cross-device federated learning to address different manifestations of behavioral and cognitive disengagement during remote learning.<n>We fit video-based cognitive disengagement detection models using facial expressions and gaze features.<n>Our results show great promise for privacy-preserving educational technologies promoting learner engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T15:40:01Z)
• GuideAI: A Real-time Personalized Learning Solution with Adaptive Interventions [0.5833117322405447]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful learning tools, but they lack awareness of learners' cognitive and physiological states.<n>We introduce GuideAI, a multi-modal framework that enhances LLM-driven learning by integrating real-time biosensory feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:06:45Z)
• Learning Through Dialogue: Unpacking the Dynamics of Human-LLM Conversations on Political Issues [17.05441917302334]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as conversational partners for learning, yet the interactional dynamics supporting users' learning and engagement are understudied.<n>We analyze the linguistic and interactional features from both LLM and participant chats across 397 human-LLM conversations about socio-political issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T18:10:21Z)
• Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning [94.60442643943696]
  We introduce Cognitive Reasoning, a paradigm modeled on human social cognition.<n>CogFlow is a complete framework that instills this capability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:27:29Z)
• When Models Know More Than They Can Explain: Quantifying Knowledge Transfer in Human-AI Collaboration [79.69935257008467]
  We introduce Knowledge Integration and Transfer Evaluation (KITE), a conceptual and experimental framework for Human-AI knowledge transfer capabilities.<n>We conduct the first large-scale human study (N=118) explicitly designed to measure it.<n>In our two-phase setup, humans first ideate with an AI on problem-solving strategies, then independently implement solutions, isolating model explanations' influence on human understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T20:48:16Z)
• Truly Self-Improving Agents Require Intrinsic Metacognitive Learning [59.60803539959191]
  Self-improving agents aim to continuously acquire new capabilities with minimal supervision.<n>Current approaches face two key limitations: their self-improvement processes are often rigid, fail to generalize across tasks domains, and struggle to scale with increasing agent capabilities.<n>We argue that effective self-improvement requires intrinsic metacognitive learning, defined as an agent's intrinsic ability to actively evaluate, reflect on, and adapt its own learning processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T14:53:35Z)
• From Consumption to Collaboration: Measuring Interaction Patterns to Augment Human Cognition in Open-Ended Tasks [2.048226951354646]
  The rise of Generative AI, and Large Language Models (LLMs) in particular, is fundamentally changing cognitive processes in knowledge work.<n>We present a framework that analyzes interaction patterns along two dimensions: cognitive activity mode (exploration vs. exploitation) and cognitive engagement mode (constructive vs. detrimental)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T17:20:36Z)
• Dynamic Demonstration Retrieval and Cognitive Understanding for Emotional Support Conversation [35.49338831485202]
  We tackle two key challenges in ESC: enhancing contextually relevant and empathetic response generation and advancing cognitive understanding. ourwork is a novel approach that synergizes these elements to improve the quality of support provided in ESCs. Our codes are available for public access to facilitate further research and development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T06:47:15Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.