PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18199v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 17:38:38 GMT
• Title: PPL-Factory: Task-Aware and Budget-Aware Data Selection from Language Modeling to Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We propose PPL-Factory, a simple and interpretable data selection framework.<n>Experiments on GSM8K demonstrate that PPL-Factory outperforms other state-of-the-art data selection methods.
• Score: 6.950650586528147
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Not all training samples contribute equally to large language model fine-tuning. Selecting informative training samples can reduce the computational cost while preserving downstream performance. Many existing data selection methods rely on indirect heuristics, such as data quality, diversity or reasoning trace length. However, the effectiveness of these fixed criteria is task-dependent and difficult to generalize across diverse downstream tasks. Perplexity-based data selection provides a simple and model-aware solution to estimate the sample difficulty, but existing approaches typically score the entire training sequence and ignore the difference in learning objectives of language modeling and reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose PPL-Factory, a simple and interpretable data selection framework that combines task-aware perplexity-based scores and data budget-aware selection criteria. Experiments on GSM8K demonstrate that PPL-Factory outperforms other state-of-the-art data selection methods using only $1\%$ of the training set. With $10\%$ of the data, PPL-Factory exceeds full-data fine-tuning accuracy by 0.9 on GSM8K and 4.8 on MATH. Overall, our results demonstrate that task-aware and budget-aware perplexity-based selection provides an effective and applicable approach for efficient fine-tuning.

Related papers

• Learning Multi-Indicator Weights for Data Selection: A Joint Task-Model Adaptation Framework with Efficient Proxies [50.39041754816285]
  We propose a framework for learning multi-validation weights that jointly adapts data selection to both the downstream task and the specific model.<n>Our approach achieves performance comparable to or exceeding full-dataset tuning while using only 30% of the training samples on GSM8K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T17:30:16Z)
• T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [5.963754140027611]
  Token-Selective HIeRarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning (T-SHIRT) is a novel data selection framework.<n>We demonstrate that models instruction-tuned on a curated dataset can outperform those trained on the entire large-scale dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T04:59:17Z)
• Data Whisperer: Efficient Data Selection for Task-Specific LLM Fine-Tuning via Few-Shot In-Context Learning [40.19639581728674]
  Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on task-specific data is essential for their effective deployment.<n>We propose Data Whisperer, an efficient, training-free, attention-based method that leverages few-shot in-context learning with the model to be fine-tuned.<n>Data Whisperer achieves superior performance compared to the full GSM8K dataset on the Llama-3-8B-Instruct model, using just 10% of the data, and outperforms existing methods with a 3.1-point improvement and a 7.4$times$ speedup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T03:10:00Z)
• Add-One-In: Incremental Sample Selection for Large Language Models via a Choice-Based Greedy Paradigm [50.492124556982674]
  This paper introduces a novel choice-based sample selection framework.<n>It shifts the focus from evaluating individual sample quality to comparing the contribution value of different samples.<n>We validate our approach on a larger medical dataset, highlighting its practical applicability in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T07:32:41Z)
• Compute-Constrained Data Selection [77.06528009072967]
  We find that many powerful data selection methods are almost never compute-optimal.<n>For compute-optimal training, we find that perplexity and gradient data selection require training-to-selection model size ratios of 5x and 10x, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:11:21Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with Datamodels [81.01744199870043]
  Standard practice is to filter for examples that match human notions of data quality. We find that selecting according to similarity with "high quality" data sources may not increase (and can even hurt) performance compared to randomly selecting data. Our framework avoids handpicked notions of data quality, and instead models explicitly how the learning process uses train datapoints to predict on the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T17:22:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.