ConceptCF: Concept-based Counterfactuals for the Explainability of Time Series
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18748v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 06:12:16 GMT
- Title: ConceptCF: Concept-based Counterfactuals for the Explainability of Time Series
- Abstract summary: ConceptCF is a method for counterfactual generation that operates on human-interpretable concepts.<n>In high-stakes domains such as healthcare and predictive maintenance, artificial intelligence models can increase efficiency and safety.
- Score: 1.7616014313664448
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper proposes ConceptCF, a method for counterfactual generation that operates on human-interpretable concepts. In high-stakes domains such as healthcare and predictive maintenance, artificial intelligence models can increase efficiency and safety. Explainability is key to ensure these models rely on causal relationships rather than spurious correlations. Counterfactual explanations identify minimal modifications that would change a model's predictions. Existing methods for time series operate on individual points or subsequences without ensuring interpretability of the mutations. ConceptCF instead modifies meaningful concepts. As a result we can provide explanations in terms of these concepts, for example ``the model's prediction would be `Sit' instead of `Walk' if you increase the scale of the movement''. In this paper, the concepts are constructed through time series decomposition, resulting in concepts such as scale, and frequency bands. Counterfactuals are generated using a genetic algorithm that optimizes the concept mutations. Evaluation against five state-of-the-art approaches demonstrates that ConceptCF consistently achieves top-tier performance across validity, confidence, proximity, sparsity and plausibility metrics.
Related papers
- MUtE: A Dual Framework for Concept Erasure and Counterfactual Interventions [0.0]
Erasing concept-specific information from representations has been proven useful for mitigating bias or interpreting model decisions.<n>We revisit the optimal bounds of concept erasure to derive a novel class of erasure functions that naturally induce a deterministic, dual counterfactual mapping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-10T08:47:11Z) - Rethinking Concept Bottleneck Models: From Pitfalls to Solutions [53.84388497227224]
Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground predictions in human-understandable concepts.<n>CBM-Suite is a methodological framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T19:37:49Z) - Temporal Concept Dynamics in Diffusion Models via Prompt-Conditioned Interventions [70.87254264798341]
PCI is a training-free and model-agnostic framework for analyzing concept dynamics through diffusion time.<n>It reveals diverse temporal behaviors across diffusion models, in which certain phases of the trajectory are more favorable to specific concepts even within the same concept type.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-09T11:05:08Z) - I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data? [76.15163242945813]
Large language models (LLMs) have led many to conclude that they exhibit a form of intelligence.<n>We introduce a novel generative model that generates tokens on the basis of human-interpretable concepts represented as latent discrete variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T01:21:17Z) - Exchangeable Sequence Models Quantify Uncertainty Over Latent Concepts [6.256239986541708]
We show that pre-trained sequence models are naturally capable of probabilistic reasoning over exchangeable data points.<n>A sequence model learns the relationship between observations, which differs from typical Bayesian models.<n>We show the sequence prediction loss controls the quality of uncertainty quantification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T17:16:10Z) - ClassDiffusion: More Aligned Personalization Tuning with Explicit Class Guidance [90.57708419344007]
We present **ClassDiffusion**, a technique that leverages a **semantic preservation loss** to explicitly regulate the concept space when learning a new concept.<n>Although simple, this approach effectively prevents semantic drift during the fine-tuning process of the target concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-27T17:50:10Z) - Beyond Concept Bottleneck Models: How to Make Black Boxes Intervenable? [8.391254800873599]
We introduce a method to perform concept-based interventions on pretrained neural networks, which are not interpretable by design.
We formalise the notion of intervenability as a measure of the effectiveness of concept-based interventions and leverage this definition to fine-tune black boxes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T16:02:14Z) - An Axiomatic Approach to Model-Agnostic Concept Explanations [67.84000759813435]
We propose an approach to concept explanations that satisfy three natural axioms: linearity, recursivity, and similarity.
We then establish connections with previous concept explanation methods, offering insight into their varying semantic meanings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T20:53:35Z) - Do Concept Bottleneck Models Respect Localities? [14.77558378567965]
Concept-based explainability methods use human-understandable intermediaries to produce explanations for machine learning models.<n>We assess whether concept predictors leverage "relevant" features to make predictions, a term we call locality.<n>We find that many concept-based models used in practice fail to respect localities because concept predictors cannot always clearly distinguish distinct concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-02T16:05:23Z) - Hybrid Predictive Coding: Inferring, Fast and Slow [62.997667081978825]
We propose a hybrid predictive coding network that combines both iterative and amortized inference in a principled manner.
We demonstrate that our model is inherently sensitive to its uncertainty and adaptively balances balances to obtain accurate beliefs using minimum computational expense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-05T12:52:45Z) - Provable concept learning for interpretable predictions using
variational inference [7.0349768355860895]
In safety critical applications, practitioners are reluctant to trust neural networks when no interpretable explanations are available.
We propose a probabilistic modeling framework to derive (C)oncept (L)earning and (P)rediction (CLAP)
We prove that our method is able to identify them while attaining optimal classification accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-01T14:51:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.