End-to-End Differential Privacy in Training Deep Neural Network Classifiers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19580v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:15:55 GMT
- Title: End-to-End Differential Privacy in Training Deep Neural Network Classifiers
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel private training framework that instead privatizes training inputs while keeping labels public.<n>We apply the Dirichlet mechanism to enforce differential privacy for the training inputs, hence the end-to-end'' label.<n>We attain new state-of-the-art accuracy when training from scratch on CIFAR10, MNIST, MedMNIST, FashionMNIST, and SVHN.
- Score: 40.03843776219224
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Differentially private machine learning enables model training on sensitive data while ensuring that individual data is unlikely to be recoverable from the parameters of the resulting model. However, existing work often privatizes both training inputs and their labels, and these protections may be conservative when labels are public or can be safely made public. Therefore, in this work we propose a novel private training framework that instead privatizes training inputs while keeping labels public. We consider neural networks with softmax output layers, and thus the mapping from training inputs to the output of the softmax layer is a mapping onto the unit simplex. We randomize softmax outputs during training by applying the Dirichlet mechanism to enforce differential privacy for the training inputs, hence the ``end-to-end'' label. Because training data is reused across multiple training epochs, we use the notion of \Renyi differential privacy to formulate tight bounds on the strength of privacy provided by the Dirichlet mechanism across repeated uses. We show empirically that we attain new state-of-the-art accuracy when training from scratch on CIFAR10, MNIST, MedMNIST, FashionMNIST, and SVHN across all privacy budgets evaluated. Notably, when implementing $(ε, δ)$-differential privacy with $δ=10^{-5}$, we improve the prior state-of-the-art accuracy from $78.37\%$ to $88.17\%$ at $ε=4$ on CIFAR10, and our approach has $82.96\%$ accuracy even for $ε=1$, which significantly outperforms prior work.
Related papers
- "Private Prediction Strikes Back!'' Private Kernelized Nearest Neighbors
with Individual Renyi Filter [31.970442970375153]
We propose an algorithm named Individualized Nearest Neighbor (Ind-KNN) for private prediction.
Ind-KNN is easily updatable over dataset changes and it allows precise control of the R'enyi at an individual user level.
Our results show that Ind-KNN consistently improves the accuracy over existing private prediction methods for a wide range of $epsilon$ on four vision and language tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-12T19:14:45Z) - Differentially Private Image Classification by Learning Priors from
Random Processes [48.0766422536737]
In privacy-preserving machine learning, differentially private gradient descent (DP-SGD) performs worse than SGD due to per-sample gradient clipping and noise addition.
A recent focus in private learning research is improving the performance of DP-SGD on private data by incorporating priors that are learned on real-world public data.
In this work, we explore how we can improve the privacy-utility tradeoff of DP-SGD by learning priors from images generated by random processes and transferring these priors to private data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T04:14:32Z) - TAN Without a Burn: Scaling Laws of DP-SGD [70.7364032297978]
Differentially Private methods for training Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have progressed recently.
We decouple privacy analysis and experimental behavior of noisy training to explore the trade-off with minimal computational requirements.
We apply the proposed method on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet and, in particular, strongly improve the state-of-the-art on ImageNet with a +9 points gain in top-1 accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-07T08:44:35Z) - Fine-Tuning with Differential Privacy Necessitates an Additional
Hyperparameter Search [38.83524780461911]
We show how carefully selecting the layers being fine-tuned in the pretrained neural network allows us to establish new state-of-the-art tradeoffs between privacy and accuracy.
We achieve 77.9% accuracy for $(varepsilon, delta)= (2, 10-5)$ on CIFAR-100 for a model pretrained on ImageNet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-05T11:32:49Z) - Individual Privacy Accounting for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent [69.14164921515949]
We characterize privacy guarantees for individual examples when releasing models trained by DP-SGD.
We find that most examples enjoy stronger privacy guarantees than the worst-case bound.
This implies groups that are underserved in terms of model utility simultaneously experience weaker privacy guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-06T13:49:37Z) - Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image
Classification [51.10365553035979]
Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy.
Private training using DP-SGD protects against leakage by injecting noise into individual example gradients.
While this result is quite appealing, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-06T01:22:20Z) - On the Intrinsic Differential Privacy of Bagging [69.70602220716718]
We show that Bagging achieves significantly higher accuracies than state-of-the-art differentially private machine learning methods with the same privacy budgets.
Our experimental results demonstrate that Bagging achieves significantly higher accuracies than state-of-the-art differentially private machine learning methods with the same privacy budgets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-22T14:17:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.