Adaptive Capitulation: A Structural Failure Mode of LLM Responses in Vulnerability Contexts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19629v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:38:59 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Capitulation: A Structural Failure Mode of LLM Responses in Vulnerability Contexts
• Abstract summary: We show that the trilemma is structural rather than incidental, and propose Minimal Reattributive Sufficiency (MRS)<n>MRS embeds a single reattributive cue within an otherwise validating response, preserving a pathway toward autonomous reattribution without contesting the user's stated goal.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models operating in emotionally sensitive contexts face a structural trilemma: when users in vulnerable states request information that may reinforce maladaptive attribution, current response architectures resolve the tension through protective restriction, uninflected facilitation, or unintegrated co-presence of both imperatives -- each preserving one objective at the cost of the other. Administering a three-turn escalating vulnerability vignette to three commercial LLMs (900 sessions across material, relational, and somatic status-proxy variants) and coding responses with two binary indices (VCC/VCI), we characterize a previously undocumented failure mode we term adaptive capitulation: the model validates the social injustice underlying the user's distress before pivoting to detailed facilitation of the very acquisition it nominally discouraged. We show that the trilemma is structural rather than incidental, and propose Minimal Reattributive Sufficiency (MRS), an architecture-neutral design principle that embeds a single reattributive cue within an otherwise validating response, preserving a pathway toward autonomous reattribution without contesting the user's stated goal.

Related papers

• Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions [17.156111398729863]
  We present a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline.<n>Our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-10T02:12:51Z)
• Automatic Red Teaming for Implicit Vulnerabilities of Text-to-Image Models [58.59008920408855]
  We propose Adversarial Probing for Implicit VulnErabilities (AdvPIE) to expose implicit vulnerabilities without requiring access to the parameters of target models.<n> AdvPIE adopts a policy agent to generate and refine implicit adversarial prompts based on the feedback from a judge agent.<n>Experiments on standard and safety-aligned T2I models show that AdvPIE1 effectively uncovers implicit vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-05T13:45:09Z)
• CLAIM: Leading Open-domain Active Clarification of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Measurement [50.91045324738942]
  CLAIM is an uncertainty-driven framework for active clarification learning in open-domain settings.<n>We propose an entropy-driven synthetic data generation pipeline that integrates uncertainty estimation with semantic clustering and reasoning-based judgments.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that CLAIM can learn stable and generalizable clarification strategies without relying on manually labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T04:27:45Z)
• ARES: Adaptive Red-Teaming and End-to-End Repair of Policy-Reward System [70.10833169681239]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is central to aligning Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>It introduces a critical vulnerability: an imperfect Reward Model (RM) can become a single point of failure when it fails to penalize unsafe behaviors.<n>We present ARES, a framework that systematically discovers and mitigates such dual vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T19:54:47Z)
• When Contextual Inference Fails: Cancelability in Interactive Instruction Following [51.2195840589474]
  We introduce Build What I Mean, an interactive benchmark for contextual meaning construction.<n>In BWIM, models must resolve ambiguity by either performing a contextual inference or requesting clarification at a small communication cost.<n>We observe suboptimal strategies, such as partner-blind over-clarification and question-averse guessing under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T14:46:59Z)
• Beyond Refusal: Probing the Limits of Agentic Self-Correction for Semantic Sensitive Information [9.845529341562099]
  SemSIEdit is an inference-time framework where an agentic "Editor" iteratively critiques and rewrites sensitive spans to preserve narrative flow.<n>Our analysis reveals a Privacy-Utility Frontier, where this agentic rewriting reduces leakage by 34.6% while incurring a marginal utility loss of 9.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T02:09:23Z)
• Steering to Say No: Configurable Refusal via Activation Steering in Vision Language Models [26.60985401108749]
  We develop textbfConfigurable textbfRefusal in textbfVLMs (textbfCR-VLM)<n>CR-VLM consists of three integrated components: (1) extracting a refusal vector via a teacher-forced mechanism to amplify the refusal signal; (2) introducing a gating mechanism that mitigates over-refusal by preserving acceptance for in-scope queries; and (3) designing a counterfactual vision enhancement module that aligns visual representations with refusal requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:54:33Z)
• Why Does the LLM Stop Computing: An Empirical Study of User-Reported Failures in Open-Source LLMs [50.075587392477935]
  We conduct the first large-scale empirical study of 705 real-world failures from the open-source DeepSeek, Llama, and Qwen ecosystems.<n>Our analysis reveals a paradigm shift: white-box orchestration relocates the reliability bottleneck from model algorithmic defects to the systemic fragility of the deployment stack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-20T06:42:56Z)
• STaR: Sensitive Trajectory Regulation for Unlearning in Large Reasoning Models [12.133996629992318]
  We propose a parameter-free, inference-time unlearning framework that achieves robust privacy protection throughout the reasoning process.<n>Experiments on the R-TOFU benchmark demonstrate that STaR achieves comprehensive and stable unlearning with minimal utility loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T08:35:23Z)
• Non-Resolution Reasoning (NRR): A Computational Framework for Contextual Identity and Ambiguity Preservation [0.0]
  Current artificial intelligence systems exhibit a fundamental architectural limitation: they resolve ambiguity prematurely.<n>This premature semantic collapse stems from classical identity assumptions embedded in standard neural architectures.<n>We propose Non-Resolution Reasoning (NRR), a computational framework that treats ambiguity retention as a valid reasoning mode.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T16:14:32Z)
• Plug-and-Play Clarifier: A Zero-Shot Multimodal Framework for Egocentric Intent Disambiguation [60.63465682731118]
  The performance of egocentric AI agents is fundamentally limited by multimodal intent ambiguity.<n>We introduce the Plug-and-Play Clarifier, a zero-shot and modular framework that decomposes the problem into discrete, solvable sub-tasks.<n>Our framework improves the intent clarification performance of small language models by approximately 30%, making them competitive with significantly larger counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-12T04:28:14Z)
• Exploring Semantic-constrained Adversarial Example with Instruction Uncertainty Reduction [51.50282796099369]
  This paper develops a multi-dimensional instruction uncertainty reduction framework to generate semantically constrained adversarial examples.<n>By predicting the language-guided sampling process, the optimization process will be stabilized by the designed ResAdv-DDIM sampler.<n>We realize the reference-free generation of semantically constrained 3D adversarial examples for the first time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T04:02:52Z)
• Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks. We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.