GRADRAG: Cross-Component Prompt Adaptation for Coordinated Multi-Agent RAG

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21324v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 13:54:38 GMT
• Title: GRADRAG: Cross-Component Prompt Adaptation for Coordinated Multi-Agent RAG
• Abstract summary: We introduce GRADRAG, a framework for cross-component prompt adaptation.<n>An Evaluator critiques downstream answers and supporting evidence, producing actionable feedback.<n>We evaluate GRADRAG on the SQUALITY and QMSUM benchmarks.
• Score: 0.5566372336864309
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems increasingly employ multiple LLM agents. Yet, most prior work optimizes components in isolation rather than coordinating improvements across the pipeline. We introduce GRADRAG, a framework for cross-component prompt adaptation that models the RAG pipeline as a computational graph and propagates structured evaluation feedback to update upstream agents. An Evaluator critiques downstream answers and supporting evidence, producing actionable feedback that a Prompt Optimizer uses to iteratively update adaptive agents, such as retrievers, graph constructors, and answerers. The Evaluator also triggers early stopping when the output is deemed satisfactory. We evaluate GRADRAG on the SQUALITY and QMSUM benchmarks under two retrieval paradigms: flat chunk-based retrieval using IRCoT-style query refinement (Trivedi et al., 2023), and graph-based retrieval that constructs and iteratively enriches an entity-relation graph from the document. Across both settings, GRADRAG consistently outperforms one-step refinement baselines that update only the final generator, achieving a 12-15 percentage point net preference margin in LLM-judged pairwise comparisons, with most gains realized within two refinement iterations.

Related papers

• Is GraphRAG Needed? From Basic RAG to Graph-/Agentic Solutions with Context Optimization [9.99981815735792]
  We introduce a framework for different RAG scenarios evaluation and comparison on semi-structured knowledge bases.<n>We provide implementation for 9 standardized RAG scenarios, and conduct experiments for a comprehensive comparison.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T10:11:02Z)
• F-GRPO: Factorized Group-Relative Policy Optimization for Unified Candidate Generation and Ranking [79.49893545611779]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate a subset and order it within a single autoregressive pass.<n>This flexibility introduces a new optimization challenge: the model must search an output space while receiving utility feedback only after the full ranked list is generated.<n>This credit assignment gap makes end-to-end optimization unstable and sample-inefficient.<n>We propose a unified framework that performs both within a single autoregressive rollout and optimize them end-to-end via factorized group-relative policy optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T04:52:33Z)
• PARM: Pipeline-Adapted Reward Model [60.769414637325326]
  Reward models (RMs) are central to aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, powering advanced decoding strategies.<n>While most prior work focuses on single-step generation, real-world applications increasingly adopt multi-stage pipelines.<n>We investigate this through code generation for optimization, constructing a pipeline that integrates reward models into both formulation and solution stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T14:29:08Z)
• Graphs RAG at Scale: Beyond Retrieval-Augmented Generation With Labeled Property Graphs and Resource Description Framework for Complex and Unknown Search Spaces [0.23157817950780824]
  We introduce a novel end-to-end Graph RAG framework to overcome limitations of traditional RAG methods.<n>Our approach enables dynamic document retrieval without the need to pre-specify the number of documents.<n>We present a text to Cypher framework for LPG, achieving over 90% accuracy in realtime translation of text queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-21T11:35:29Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• RankGR: Rank-Enhanced Generative Retrieval with Listwise Direct Preference Optimization in Recommendation [36.297513746770456]
  We propose RankGR, a Generative Retrieval method that incorporates listwise direct preference optimization for recommendation.<n>In IAP, we incorporate a novel listwise direct preference optimization strategy into GR, thus facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of the hierarchical user preferences.<n>We implement several practical improvements in training and deployment, ultimately achieving a real-time system capable of handling nearly ten thousand requests per second.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T12:13:43Z)
• A Navigational Approach for Comprehensive RAG via Traversal over Proposition Graphs [23.840376380790783]
  ToPG models its knowledge base as a heterogeneous graph of propositions, entities, and passages.<n>ToPG demonstrates strong performance across both accuracy- and quality-based metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T11:50:40Z)
• RouteRAG: Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation from Text and Graph via Reinforcement Learning [69.87510139069218]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates non-parametric knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent progress has advanced text-based RAG to multi-turn reasoning through Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>We introduce model, an RL-based framework that enables LLMs to perform multi-turn and adaptive graph-text hybrid RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-10T10:05:31Z)
• TeaRAG: A Token-Efficient Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework [62.66056331998838]
  TeaRAG is a token-efficient agentic RAG framework capable of compressing both retrieval content and reasoning steps.<n>Our reward function evaluates the knowledge sufficiency by a knowledge matching mechanism, while penalizing excessive reasoning steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T16:08:34Z)
• Chain-of-Retrieval Augmented Generation [91.02950964802454]
  This paper introduces an approach for training o1-like RAG models that retrieve and reason over relevant information step by step before generating the final answer.<n>Our proposed method, CoRAG, allows the model to dynamically reformulate the query based on the evolving state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T09:12:52Z)
• Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [21.115495457454365]
  Traditional end-to-end evaluation methods are computationally expensive. We propose eRAG, where each document in the retrieval list is individually utilized by the large language model within the RAG system. eRAG offers significant computational advantages, improving runtime and consuming up to 50 times less GPU memory than end-to-end evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T21:22:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.