Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13781v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:22:28 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Retrieval Quality in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Authors: Alireza Salemi, Hamed Zamani,
• Abstract summary: Traditional end-to-end evaluation methods are computationally expensive. We propose eRAG, where each document in the retrieval list is individually utilized by the large language model within the RAG system. eRAG offers significant computational advantages, improving runtime and consuming up to 50 times less GPU memory than end-to-end evaluation.
• Score: 21.115495457454365
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Evaluating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) presents challenges, particularly for retrieval models within these systems. Traditional end-to-end evaluation methods are computationally expensive. Furthermore, evaluation of the retrieval model's performance based on query-document relevance labels shows a small correlation with the RAG system's downstream performance. We propose a novel evaluation approach, eRAG, where each document in the retrieval list is individually utilized by the large language model within the RAG system. The output generated for each document is then evaluated based on the downstream task ground truth labels. In this manner, the downstream performance for each document serves as its relevance label. We employ various downstream task metrics to obtain document-level annotations and aggregate them using set-based or ranking metrics. Extensive experiments on a wide range of datasets demonstrate that eRAG achieves a higher correlation with downstream RAG performance compared to baseline methods, with improvements in Kendall's $\tau$ correlation ranging from 0.168 to 0.494. Additionally, eRAG offers significant computational advantages, improving runtime and consuming up to 50 times less GPU memory than end-to-end evaluation.

Related papers

• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)
• RAGEval: Scenario Specific RAG Evaluation Dataset Generation Framework [69.4501863547618]
  This paper introduces RAGEval, a framework designed to assess RAG systems across diverse scenarios. With a focus on factual accuracy, we propose three novel metrics Completeness, Hallucination, and Irrelevance. Experimental results show that RAGEval outperforms zero-shot and one-shot methods in terms of clarity, safety, conformity, and richness of generated samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T13:35:11Z)
• BERGEN: A Benchmarking Library for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [26.158785168036662]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation allows to enhance Large Language Models with external knowledge. Inconsistent benchmarking poses a major challenge in comparing approaches and understanding the impact of each component in the pipeline. In this work, we study best practices that lay the groundwork for a systematic evaluation of RAG and present BERGEN, an end-to-end library for reproducible research standardizing RAG experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:09:27Z)
• RAGBench: Explainable Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [0.0]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard architectural pattern for domain-specific knowledge into user-facing chat applications. We introduce RAGBench: the first comprehensive, large-scale RAG benchmark dataset of 100k examples. We formalize the TRACe evaluation framework: a set of explainable and actionable RAG evaluation metrics applicable across all RAG domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T20:23:15Z)
• RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG [83.24385658573198]
  We propose a framework for training query rewriting models free of annotations. By leveraging a publicly available reranker, oursprovides feedback aligned well with the rewriting objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T11:00:19Z)
• Contextualization with SPLADE for High Recall Retrieval [5.973857434357868]
  High Recall Retrieval (HRR) is a search problem that optimize the cost of retrieving most relevant documents in a given collection. In this work, we leverage SPLADE, an efficient retrieval model that transforms documents into contextualized sparse vectors. It reduces 10% and 18% of the review cost in two HRR evaluation collections under a one-phase review workflow with a target recall of 80%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T03:05:37Z)
• CRUD-RAG: A Comprehensive Chinese Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Large Language Models [49.16989035566899]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a technique that enhances the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge sources. This paper constructs a large-scale and more comprehensive benchmark, and evaluates all the components of RAG systems in various RAG application scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T14:25:32Z)
• ARES: An Automated Evaluation Framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [46.522527144802076]
  We introduce ARES, an Automated RAG Evaluation System, for evaluating RAG systems. ARES finetunes lightweight LM judges to assess the quality of individual RAG components. We make our code and datasets publicly available on Github.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T00:39:39Z)
• GAR-meets-RAG Paradigm for Zero-Shot Information Retrieval [16.369071865207808]
  We propose a novel GAR-meets-RAG recurrence formulation that overcomes the challenges of existing paradigms. A key design principle is that the rewrite-retrieval stages improve the recall of the system and a final re-ranking stage improves the precision. Our method establishes a new state-of-the-art in the BEIR benchmark, outperforming previous best results in Recall@100 and nDCG@10 metrics on 6 out of 8 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T03:52:08Z)
• Generation-Augmented Retrieval for Open-domain Question Answering [134.27768711201202]
  Generation-Augmented Retrieval (GAR) for answering open-domain questions. We show that generating diverse contexts for a query is beneficial as fusing their results consistently yields better retrieval accuracy. GAR achieves state-of-the-art performance on Natural Questions and TriviaQA datasets under the extractive QA setup when equipped with an extractive reader.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-17T23:08:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.