Zero-Flow Two-Sample Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21542v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:27:23 GMT
• Title: Zero-Flow Two-Sample Tests
• Abstract summary: We propose a new approach to two-sample testing for deciding whether two sets of samples are drawn from the same distribution.<n>The test is built on a statistical discrepancy based on the zero-flow criterion, termed zero-flow discrepancy (ZFD)<n>We prove the validity of ZFD and propose a practical testing procedure, termed the zero-flow two-sample test (ZF2ST)
• Score: 47.04254380987003
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We propose a new approach to two-sample testing for deciding whether two sets of samples are drawn from the same distribution. The test is built on a statistical discrepancy based on the zero-flow criterion, termed zero-flow discrepancy (ZFD). We prove the validity of ZFD and propose a practical testing procedure, termed the zero-flow two-sample test (ZF2ST). The key idea is to learn how samples from the two distributions are locally misaligned and use the resulting directional pattern as evidence of distributional difference. By separating witness learning from hypothesis evaluation, ZF2ST can use flexible neural networks while maintaining valid statistical calibration. We develop both regression-based and power-maximized approaches for learning the witness. Experiments on synthetic and image datasets demonstrate that ZF2ST can achieve strong testing power for structured distributional changes while maintaining well-calibrated type-I error.

Related papers

• Should I Use This Synthetic Dataset for Training? How to Test with Minimal Real Data [73.19814469893088]
  Digital twins and learned world models are increasingly used to generate synthetic data that augment the scarce real datasets available for training artificial intelligence (AI) models in engineering systems.<n>This paper addresses whether training on the augmented dataset improves the true, population-level performance, while consuming as few real test data points as possible.<n>Experiments on a synthetic-data classification task, a DT-aided wireless packet-scheduling task, and a radio-map prediction task show that aeSFT identifies useful synthetic data using substantially fewer real test samples than mean-based sequential testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T07:05:38Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations for Deep Two-Sample Testing [6.491513951159988]
  Two-sample testing is a fundamental tool for detecting distributional differences across scientific domains.<n>Recent deep two-sample tests improve sensitivity in these settings by learning informative representations.<n>We propose a counterfactual explanation framework for deep two-sample testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T14:17:08Z)
• A Sample Efficient Conditional Independence Test in the Presence of Discretization [54.047334792855345]
  Conditional Independence (CI) tests directly to discretized data can lead to incorrect conclusions.<n>Recent advancements have sought to infer the correct CI relationship between the latent variables through binarizing observed data.<n>Motivated by this, this paper introduces a sample-efficient CI test that does not rely on the binarization process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T12:41:26Z)
• Kernel conditional tests from learning-theoretic bounds [16.813275168865953]
  We propose a framework for hypothesis testing on conditional probability distributions.<n>We then use to construct statistical tests of functionals of conditional distributions.<n>Our results establish a comprehensive foundation for conditional testing on functionals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T12:53:13Z)
• Conditional Diffusion Models Based Conditional Independence Testing [8.34871567507739]
  Conditional randomization test (CRT) was recently introduced to test whether two random variables, $X$ and $Y$, are conditionally independent.<n>We propose using conditional diffusion models (CDMs) to learn the distribution of $X|Z$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T13:03:18Z)
• DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models [69.41389326333771]
  Vision-language foundation models can be unreliable when significant distribution gaps exist between training and test data.<n>We propose DOTA (DistributiOnal Test-time Adaptation), a simple yet effective method addressing this limitation.<n>This distribution-centric approach enables the model to continually learn and adapt to the deployment environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-28T15:03:28Z)
• Transductive conformal inference with adaptive scores [3.591224588041813]
  We consider the transductive setting, where decisions are made on a test sample of $m$ new points. We show that their joint distribution follows a P'olya urn model, and establish a concentration inequality for their empirical distribution function. We demonstrate the usefulness of these theoretical results through uniform, in-probability guarantees for two machine learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T12:48:30Z)
• Active Sequential Two-Sample Testing [18.99517340397671]
  We consider the two-sample testing problem in a new scenario where sample measurements are inexpensive to access. We devise the first emphactiveNIST-sample testing framework that not only sequentially but also emphactively queries. In practice, we introduce an instantiation of our framework and evaluate it using several experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T02:23:49Z)
• Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgetting [60.36499845014649]
  Test-time adaptation seeks to tackle potential distribution shifts between training and testing data. We propose an active sample selection criterion to identify reliable and non-redundant samples. We also introduce a Fisher regularizer to constrain important model parameters from drastic changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T06:39:40Z)
• Significance tests of feature relevance for a blackbox learner [6.72450543613463]
  We derive two consistent tests for the feature relevance of a blackbox learner. The first evaluates a loss difference with perturbation on an inference sample. The second splits the inference sample into two but does not require data perturbation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-02T00:59:19Z)
• Two-Sample Testing on Ranked Preference Data and the Role of Modeling Assumptions [57.77347280992548]
  In this paper, we design two-sample tests for pairwise comparison data and ranking data. Our test requires essentially no assumptions on the distributions. By applying our two-sample test on real-world pairwise comparison data, we conclude that ratings and rankings provided by people are indeed distributed differently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T20:51:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.