MIRROR: Learning from the Other View for Multi-Modal Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21552v1
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 17:35:56 GMT
- Title: MIRROR: Learning from the Other View for Multi-Modal Reasoning
- Abstract summary: We show that vision-language models (VLMs) struggle with visual reasoning, even on geometry problems that admit equivalent text, diagram, and combined diagram+text views.<n>We develop Modality-Informed Reciprocal Reasoning Optimization (MIRROR), a reinforcement learning approach for improving multimodal reasoning via self supervision.
- Score: 37.5348148058537
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Unlike large language models (LLMs) that exhibit strong reasoning capabilities, vision-language models (VLMs) struggle with visual reasoning, even on geometry problems that admit equivalent text, diagram, and combined diagram+text views. We show that these views often elicit different behaviors: a model may solve a problem from text but fail on the corresponding diagram, or succeed visually while failing textually. This inconsistency suggests that different views expose complementary reasoning paths and failure modes that standard multimodal post-training does not fully exploit. To study and exploit this phenomenon, we construct ODA-Data, a high-quality paired multimodal geometry dataset with text-dominant, image-dominant, and combined image+text views of the same problems, together with splits for training and evaluating modality-dependent reasoning behaviors. We then develop Modality-Informed Reciprocal Reasoning Optimization (MIRROR), a reinforcement learning approach for improving multimodal reasoning via self supervision. For each problem, MIRROR evaluates the model under all views, selects the best-performing view as a teacher, and trains other views with a reverse-KL objective towards the teacher. Across reasoning benchmarks that evaluate on geometry problems, MIRROR improves over standard RL and yields more accurate and consistent behavior across modalities
Related papers
- Can Unified Generation and Understanding Models Maintain Semantic Equivalence Across Different Output Modalities? [61.533560295383786]
Unified Multimodal Large Language Models (U-MLLMs) integrate understanding and generation within a single architecture.<n>We observe that U-MLLMs fail to maintain semantic equivalence when required to render the same results in the image modality.<n>We introduce VGUBench, a framework to decouple reasoning logic from generation fidelity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-27T06:23:56Z) - MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery [63.285794947638614]
We develop MentisOculi, a suite of multi-step reasoning problems amenable to visual solution.<n> evaluating visual strategies ranging from latent tokens to explicit generated imagery, we find they generally fail to improve performance.<n>Our findings suggest that despite their inherent appeal, visual thoughts do not yet benefit model reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T18:49:06Z) - AMVICC: A Novel Benchmark for Cross-Modal Failure Mode Profiling for VLMs and IGMs [2.357397994148727]
multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and image generation models (IGMs) were investigated.<n>We created a novel benchmark to compare failure modes across image-to-text and text-to-image tasks.<n>Our results show that failure modes are often shared between models and modalities, but certain failures are model-specific and modality-specific.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T00:06:58Z) - When Visualizing is the First Step to Reasoning: MIRA, a Benchmark for Visual Chain-of-Thought [118.71264263478083]
We propose MIRA, a new benchmark designed to evaluate models in scenarios where generating intermediate visual images is essential for successful reasoning.<n>We include 546 multimodal problems, annotated with intermediate visual images and final answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-04T18:00:51Z) - Zebra-CoT: A Dataset for Interleaved Vision Language Reasoning [109.84783476090028]
We introduce $textbfZebra-CoT$, a diverse large-scale dataset with 182,384 samples.<n>We focus on four categories of tasks where sketching or visual reasoning is especially natural.<n>Fine-tuning Bagel-7B yields a model that generates high-quality interleaved visual reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T16:35:36Z) - MiCo: Multi-image Contrast for Reinforcement Visual Reasoning [72.81576836419373]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning can be used to link visual cues across multiple images.<n>We adapt rule-based reinforcement learning for Vision-Language Models (VLMs)<n>Our method achieves significant improvements on multi-image reasoning benchmarks and shows strong performance on general vision tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-27T17:59:27Z) - VisioMath: Benchmarking Figure-based Mathematical Reasoning in LMMs [31.007061220012954]
We present groundingMath, a curated benchmark of 1,800 high-quality K-12 mathematics problems in which all candidate answers are diagrams with subtle visual similarities.<n>A comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LMMs, covering both leading closed-source systems and widely adopted open-source models, reveals a consistent decline in accuracy as inter-image similarity increases.<n>We explore three alignment-oriented strategies, spanning training-free approaches and finetuning, to achieve substantial accuracy gains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-07T09:24:13Z) - R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization [26.757458496178437]
We introduce R1-Onevision, a multimodal reasoning model designed to bridge the gap between visual perception and deep reasoning.<n>We construct the R1-Onevision dataset which provides detailed, step-by-step multimodal reasoning annotations across diverse domains.<n>We further develop the R1-Onevision model through supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning to cultivate advanced reasoning.<n> Experimental results show that R1-Onevision achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming models such as GPT-4o and Qwen2.5-VL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T17:56:05Z) - The Role of Visual Modality in Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: Challenges and Insights [26.85150689408895]
We show that existing multimodal mathematical models minimally leverage visual information.<n>We attribute this to the dominance of textual information and answer options that inadvertently guide the model to correct answers.<n>In testing leading models, their failure to detect subtle visual differences suggests limitations in current visual perception capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-06T07:29:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.