Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21636v2
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 01:37:29 GMT
- Title: Measuring the Dependency Gap: Diagnosing Inter-Column Fidelity in Tabular Generative Models
- Abstract summary: We introduce a dependency-aware fidelity diagnostic that decomposes a strong gradient-boosted classifier two-sample test (XGB-C2ST) into marginal, dependency, and numerical-categorical cross components.<n>We expose a real dependency gap that standard metrics miss and that tracks minority-class utility.
- Score: 5.216183083750454
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Synthetic tabular data is prized for preserving not just each column's marginal distribution but the dependencies between columns - structure that carries much of the discriminative signal for minority classes in imbalanced domains such as fraud detection and clinical risk. Yet the metrics most commonly used to certify such data are largely blind to this structure: a fully-factorized baseline that destroys all inter-column dependency is judged nearly indistinguishable from real data by the logistic-regression C2ST, while the pairwise Trend score is only partially sensitive. We introduce a dependency-aware fidelity diagnostic that decomposes a strong gradient-boosted classifier two-sample test (XGB-C2ST) into marginal, dependency, and numerical-categorical cross components, anchored between a fully-factorized lower bound and a real-data oracle upper bound. Applying it to state-of-the-art flow-matching (TabbyFlow/EF-VFM) and diffusion (TabDiff) generators, we expose a real dependency gap that standard metrics miss and that tracks minority-class utility. The gap is not a structural limitation of mean-field objectives - consistent with recent recovery results, these are asymptotically exact - yet it is stubborn: neither a 16x capacity increase nor post-hoc copula correction closes it, pointing to the absence of direct dependency supervision rather than a capacity or structural limit.
Related papers
- Impute-EM: Native Mixed-State Diffusion Models for Heterogeneous Data Imputation [71.74203645336385]
Impute-EM alternates between imputing missing entries with the current model and refitting a diffusion backbone on completed data.<n>We characterize the update and show that the observed mask-indexed marginals match the targets at the limit.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T09:39:13Z) - Constraint-Aware Synthetic Tabular Data Generation via Inter-Column Constraint Discovery with LLM Agents [3.7680093320209553]
We study the discovery and enforcement of three complementary inter-column constraint families.<n>Our unified tool-grounded workflow represents all three as machine-executable hypotheses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-15T08:19:54Z) - TimeLAVA: Learning-Agnostic Data Valuation for Time Series [48.76711740818533]
TimeLAVA is a learning-agnostic framework that values temporal segments by their marginal contribution to minimize distributional discrepancy between evaluated and reference data.<n>We provide theoretical guarantees linking valuation to model-agnostic generalization and prove bounded sensitivity to contamination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T06:16:16Z) - Towards Anomaly Detection on Relational Data [51.473064583839296]
We propose a reconstruction-based framework that captures anomalies from both attribute and relational edge reconstruction.<n>RelAD consistently outperforms other baselines while achieving competitive efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T02:36:32Z) - Learning Higher-Order Structure from Incomplete Spatiotemporal Data: Multi-Scale Hypergraph Laplacians with Neural Refinement [26.873671102536438]
Sensor networks govern modern infrastructure, yet the data they lose are rarely missing in the uniform-random patterns assumed by standard imputation benchmarks.<n>We introduce Multi-Scale Hypergraph Laplacians, a framework for learning higher-order structure from incomplete observations.<n>We prove that MSHL represents group-conservation patterns inaccessible to pairwise graph priors, adapts to the best fixed scale up to a logarithmic factor, and admits a one-sided refinement guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T08:15:16Z) - MuteBench: Modality Unavailability Tolerance Evaluation for Incomplete Multimodal Fusion [37.86089523035199]
We present MuteBench, a benchmark covering 9 datasets from 7 clinical domains.<n>We find that architecture family is the strongest predictor of robustness, outweighing parameter count.<n>Channel-independent models tolerate modality missing well but can be sensitive to within-modality missing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T19:32:11Z) - Conditional Imputation for Within-Modality Missingness in Multi-Modal Federated Learning [8.35064965629059]
Multimodal Federated Learning (MMFL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative training.<n>Real-world clinical applications often suffer from within-modality missingness caused by sensor intermittency or irregular sampling.<n>We propose CondI, a framework explicitly addressing this missingness using conditional diffusion models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-25T02:35:08Z) - Domain-Aware Hierarchical Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Generalization Fault Diagnosis [49.89578655034085]
We propose a unified framework termed domain-aware hierarchical contrastive learning (DAHCL) for fault diagnosis.<n>DAHCL captures source-domain geometric characteristics and calibrates pseudo-label predictions across heterogeneous source domains.<n>We also develop a hierarchical contrastive learning module that combines dynamic confidence stratification with fuzzy contrastive supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-22T08:41:27Z) - The Digital Twin Counterfactual Framework: A Validation Architecture for Simulated Potential Outcomes [0.0]
Digital Twin Counterfactual Framework (DTCF)<n>Five-level validation architecture converts unfalsifiable claim that simulator produces correct counterfactuals into falsifiable tests against observable data.<n> decomposition separates causal quantities into those that are marginally validated.<n>Joint causal claims become explicitly assumption-indexed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-01T19:04:15Z) - Dependence Fidelity and Downstream Inference Stability in Generative Models [0.0]
Covariance-level dependence fidelity is a useful criterion for evaluating generative models.<n> dependence divergence induces quantitative instability in downstream inference.<n>These results highlight dependence fidelity as a useful diagnostic for evaluating generative models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T18:24:31Z) - A Unified View of Attention and Residual Sinks: Outlier-Driven Rescaling is Essential for Transformer Training [86.64715217940274]
Outliers function jointly with normalization.<n>Outliers serve more as rescale factors rather than contributors.<n>Outliers can be absorbed into learnable parameters or mitigated via explicit gated rescaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T13:29:45Z) - Detecting Unobserved Confounders: A Kernelized Regression Approach [46.52607207396279]
Kernel Regression Confounder Detection (KRCD) is a novel method for detecting unobserved confounding in nonlinear observational data under single-environment conditions.<n>Test statistic whose significant deviation from zero indicates unobserved confounding.<n>Experiments on synthetic benchmarks and the Twins dataset demonstrate that KRCD not only outperforms existing baselines but also achieves superior computational efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-01T04:26:02Z) - Cellwise and Casewise Robust Covariance in High Dimensions [0.0]
The cellRCov method simultaneously handles casewise outliers, cellwise outliers, and missing data.<n>A simulation study demonstrates the superior performance of cellRCov in contaminated and missing data scenarios.<n>We also construct and illustrate the cellRCCA method for robust and regularized canonical correlation analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T12:46:44Z) - Towards Self-Supervised Covariance Estimation in Deep Heteroscedastic Regression [102.24287051757469]
We study self-supervised covariance estimation in deep heteroscedastic regression.<n>We derive an upper bound on the 2-Wasserstein distance between normal distributions.<n>Experiments over a wide range of synthetic and real datasets demonstrate that the proposed 2-Wasserstein bound coupled with pseudo label annotations results in a computationally cheaper yet accurate deep heteroscedastic regression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T22:37:11Z) - DAGnosis: Localized Identification of Data Inconsistencies using
Structures [73.39285449012255]
Identification and appropriate handling of inconsistencies in data at deployment time is crucial to reliably use machine learning models.
We use directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to encode the training set's features probability distribution and independencies as a structure.
Our method, called DAGnosis, leverages these structural interactions to bring valuable and insightful data-centric conclusions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T11:29:16Z) - Bilateral Dependency Optimization: Defending Against Model-inversion
Attacks [61.78426165008083]
We propose a bilateral dependency optimization (BiDO) strategy to defend against model-inversion attacks.
BiDO achieves the state-of-the-art defense performance for a variety of datasets, classifiers, and MI attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-11T10:07:03Z) - Disentanglement and Generalization Under Correlation Shifts [22.499106910581958]
Correlations between factors of variation are prevalent in real-world data.
Machine learning algorithms may benefit from exploiting such correlations, as they can increase predictive performance on noisy data.
We aim to learn representations which capture different factors of variation in latent subspaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-29T18:55:17Z) - Examining and Combating Spurious Features under Distribution Shift [94.31956965507085]
We define and analyze robust and spurious representations using the information-theoretic concept of minimal sufficient statistics.
We prove that even when there is only bias of the input distribution, models can still pick up spurious features from their training data.
Inspired by our analysis, we demonstrate that group DRO can fail when groups do not directly account for various spurious correlations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-14T05:39:09Z) - Federated Deep AUC Maximization for Heterogeneous Data with a Constant
Communication Complexity [77.78624443410216]
We propose improved FDAM algorithms for detecting heterogeneous chest data.
A result of this paper is that the communication of the proposed algorithm is strongly independent of the number of machines and also independent of the accuracy level.
Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our FDAM algorithm on benchmark datasets and on medical chest Xray images from different organizations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-09T04:05:19Z) - Weakly-Supervised Cross-Domain Adaptation for Endoscopic Lesions
Segmentation [79.58311369297635]
We propose a new weakly-supervised lesions transfer framework, which can explore transferable domain-invariant knowledge across different datasets.
A Wasserstein quantified transferability framework is developed to highlight widerange transferable contextual dependencies.
A novel self-supervised pseudo label generator is designed to equally provide confident pseudo pixel labels for both hard-to-transfer and easy-to-transfer target samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-08T02:26:03Z) - Generalizing Variational Autoencoders with Hierarchical Empirical Bayes [6.273154057349038]
We present Hierarchical Empirical Bayes Autoencoder (HEBAE), a computationally stable framework for probabilistic generative models.
Our key contributions are two-fold. First, we make gains by placing a hierarchical prior over the encoding distribution, enabling us to adaptively balance the trade-off between minimizing the reconstruction loss function and avoiding over-regularization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-20T18:18:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.