Enough is as good as a feast: A Comprehensive Analysis of How Reinforcement Learning Mitigates Task Conflicts in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22039v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 07:08:57 GMT
• Title: Enough is as good as a feast: A Comprehensive Analysis of How Reinforcement Learning Mitigates Task Conflicts in LLMs
• Abstract summary: This study systematically explores the merging behavior of RL-trained large language models (LLMs) compared to those trained with traditional SFT.<n>We find that RL significantly reduces task conflicts and results in less performance degradation after merging.
• Score: 52.129885179495226
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Model merging plays a crucial role in consolidating multiple specialized models into a single, unified model, especially in the era of large language models (LLMs). Recent research has primarily focused on developing strategies to enhance merging performance with the trained models, while the impact of training paradigms, such as supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL), on the effectiveness of model merging remains underexplored. In this study, we systematically explore the merging behavior of RL-trained LLMs compared to those trained with traditional SFT. Through comprehensive evaluations across five representative tasks, we find that RL significantly reduces task conflicts and results in less performance degradation after merging, making RL-trained models particularly well-suited for this process. To unearth the reasons behind the superior suitability of RL for model merging, we conduct extensive empirical experiments and theoretical analyses. Our findings highlight three key factors: (1) On-policy training data in RL control the gradient updates in a smaller magnitude, reducing the risk of overwriting existing knowledge for other tasks in the model. (2) The RL optimization objective, which favors ``\textit{enough is as good as a feast}", progressively reduces the magnitude and the number of conflict parameter updates as the model converges. (3) Joint optimization of positive and negative examples in RL steers the model towards an unbiased task-specific parameter subspace, ensuring robust performance while further preventing parameter conflicts.

Related papers

• On Predicting the Post-training Potential of Pre-trained LLMs [60.07459271263409]
  We introduce a new task of predicting post-training potential - forecasting a base model's performance before post-training.<n>We propose RuDE, a unified framework that bypasses the generation gap of base models by leveraging response discrimination.<n>Experiments demonstrate a correlation greater than 90% with post-training performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T11:33:49Z)
• Demystifying Reinforcement Learning in Agentic Reasoning [90.3737088727791]
  We conduct a comprehensive and systematic investigation to demystify reinforcement learning in agentic reasoning.<n>We highlight our key insights: (i) replacing stitched synthetic trajectories with real end-to-end tool-use trajectories yields a far stronger SFT.<n> Exploration-friendly techniques are crucial for agentic RL, such as clip higher, overlong reward shaping, and maintaining adequate policy entropy could improve the training efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T17:57:15Z)
• Ring-lite: Scalable Reasoning via C3PO-Stabilized Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [51.21041884010009]
  Ring-lite is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)-based large language model optimized via reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Our approach matches the performance of state-of-the-art (SOTA) small-scale reasoning models on challenging benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:12:34Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [93.00629872970364]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce SPARKLE, a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the effects of RL across three key dimensions.<n>We study whether difficult problems -- those yielding no RL signals and mixed-quality reasoning traces -- can still be effectively used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Reshaping Reasoning in LLMs: A Theoretical Analysis of RL Training Dynamics through Pattern Selection [35.268183415853976]
  We provide an explanation of the RL training process through empirical analysis and rigorous theoretical modeling.<n>We develop a theoretical framework to understand the training dynamics of RL with two typical rewards: reward (RLVR) and model's internal feedback (RLIF)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:17:04Z)
• Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement Learning [45.744838898763554]
  We analyze the per-step influence of the RL objective and identify two key conditions for effective post-training.<n>We propose behavior injection, a task-agnostic data augmentation scheme applied prior to RL.<n>We evaluate our method across two reasoning benchmarks with multiple base models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T00:54:50Z)
• Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining [74.83412846804977]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has become a crucial step in post-training language models.<n>We present a systematic end-to-end study of RL fine-tuning for mathematical reasoning by training models entirely from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T17:15:53Z)
• Investigating the Impact of Model Complexity in Large Language Models [3.7919508292745676]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) based on the pre-trained fine-tuning paradigm have become pivotal in solving natural language processing tasks. In this paper, we focus on autoregressive LLMs and propose to employ Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to model them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T13:53:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.