Commitment To Cooperation With Self-Negotiated Contracts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22750v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:04:58 GMT
• Title: Commitment To Cooperation With Self-Negotiated Contracts
• Abstract summary: We study the role of contract-based cooperation using LLM-based agents in CT, a spatial-temporal game that combines bargaining with navigation towards a goal.<n>We find that self-negotiated contracts can improve cooperative outcomes beyond what is possible with regular trading.
• Score: 3.585764648520447
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As AI agents operate with increasing autonomy in a multi-agent world, they will need to learn to cooperate with other agents and with humans to generate mutual benefits. However, cooperation is a challenge because the costs of cooperation are often incurred early on, but the benefits are only realized later, creating an incentive to defect. How can AI agents cooperate with commitment? Here, we draw on inspiration from legal institutions and contracting that human societies have used to solve principal-agent problems of this kind. Contracts provide observable representations of agreements that enable credible commitments through the enforcement of terms. We study the role of contract-based cooperation using LLM-based agents in \CT, a spatial-temporal game that combines bargaining with navigation towards a goal. We study a suite of contract representations that range from formal contracts that compile to code to natural contracts that require reinterpretation. We evaluate agents with a range of LLM backbones using different sizes and providers. We find that self-negotiated contracts can improve cooperative outcomes beyond what is possible with regular trading.

Related papers

• Evaluating Rational Contracting in Natural Language [21.96106614313801]
  We develop a rational framework for how agents should negotiate and perform natural language contracts in uncertain multi-step environments.<n>We instantiate our framework in ContractSim, an evaluation suite where two players negotiate and execute a multi-turn supplier contract.<n>We find that current LLM-based agents reach agreement reliably, and negotiate efficient contracts when environmental uncertainty is low.<n>They are also frequently uncooperative when executing contracts, violating contract terms for additional profit even when contracts are easy to satisfy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-11T04:44:50Z)
• Collaborating in Multi-Armed Bandits with Strategic Agents [37.473632043513014]
  We study collaborative learning in multi-agent Bayesian bandit problems, where strategic agents collectively solve the same bandit instance.<n>While multiple agents can accelerate learning by sharing information, strategic agents might prefer to free-ride and avoid exploration.<n>We propose textttCAOS, a mechanism that sustains collaboration as a Nash equilibrium while achieving strong regret guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T08:10:36Z)
• SynAgent: Generalizable Cooperative Humanoid Manipulation via Solo-to-Cooperative Agent Synergy [59.86199649493784]
  Controllable cooperative humanoid manipulation is a fundamental yet challenging problem for embodied intelligence.<n>We present SynAgent, a framework that enables scalable and physically plausible cooperative manipulation.<n>In experiments, SynAgent significantly outperforms existing baselines in both cooperative imitation and trajectory-conditioned control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T17:46:20Z)
• Evaluating Generalization Capabilities of LLM-Based Agents in Mixed-Motive Scenarios Using Concordia [100.74015791021044]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for social interaction.<n>Existing evaluation methods fail to measure how well these capabilities generalize to novel social situations.<n>We present empirical results from the NeurIPS 2024 Concordia Contest, where agents were evaluated on their ability to achieve mutual gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T00:11:05Z)
• Corrupted by Reasoning: Reasoning Language Models Become Free-Riders in Public Goods Games [87.5673042805229]
  How large language models balance self-interest and collective well-being is a critical challenge for ensuring alignment, robustness, and safe deployment.<n>We adapt a public goods game with institutional choice from behavioral economics, allowing us to observe how different LLMs navigate social dilemmas.<n>Surprisingly, we find that reasoning LLMs, such as the o1 series, struggle significantly with cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T15:02:47Z)
• Learning to Negotiate via Voluntary Commitment [24.76922344331357]
  Partial alignment and conflict of autonomous agents lead to mixed-motive scenarios in real-world applications.<n>We propose Markov Commitment Games (MCGs), a variant of commitment games, where agents can voluntarily commit to their proposed future plans.<n> Experimental results in challenging mixed-motive tasks demonstrate faster empirical convergence and higher returns for our method compared with its counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T19:55:10Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• Building Cooperative Embodied Agents Modularly with Large Language Models [104.57849816689559]
  We address challenging multi-agent cooperation problems with decentralized control, raw sensory observations, costly communication, and multi-objective tasks instantiated in various embodied environments. We harness the commonsense knowledge, reasoning ability, language comprehension, and text generation prowess of LLMs and seamlessly incorporate them into a cognitive-inspired modular framework. Our experiments on C-WAH and TDW-MAT demonstrate that CoELA driven by GPT-4 can surpass strong planning-based methods and exhibit emergent effective communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T17:59:27Z)
• Negotiating Team Formation Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [32.066083116314815]
  We propose a framework for training agents to negotiate and form teams using deep reinforcement learning. We evaluate our approach on both non-spatial and spatially extended team-formation negotiation environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T15:41:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.