Constitutional governance for societies of AI agents in the built environment: a research agenda

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23336v1
• Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 19:18:48 GMT
• Title: Constitutional governance for societies of AI agents in the built environment: a research agenda
• Abstract summary: The paper proposes a research agenda for constitutional multi-agent governance of the built environment.<n>The paper sets out conceptual foundations, works one governance event through in detail, identifies twelve open problems, and outlines what the agenda requires in data, computation, disciplinary integration and governance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The built environment is on the cusp of populating itself with autonomous artificial agents. AI systems that advise, control and coordinate are being deployed across retrofit, operation and mobility faster than their collective behaviour is studied. The dominant framing treats each agent as a tool operating on a passive building, governance reduced to single-agent safety, which is inadequate. A building, a street, or a city is more accurately modelled as a society of negotiating agents: occupants, owners, operators, regulators, and the artificial agents increasingly acting on their behalf. Their interactions are strategic, their information asymmetric, and the outcomes that matter are properties of the whole. The paper proposes a research agenda for constitutional multi-agent governance of the built environment, organised around three problems: mechanism design for retrofit under deep uncertainty, treating public subsidy as a mechanism component; physics-informed verification of agents in building operations; and antifragile coordination for urban infrastructure under shocks. Drawing on three decades of multi-agent systems research, the paper sets out conceptual foundations, works one governance event through in detail, identifies twelve open problems, and outlines what the agenda requires in data, computation, disciplinary integration and governance.

Related papers

• The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI [0.0]
  We argue that agentic AI governance is four problems, not one, each with a mature governing science.<n>We formalize each layer, derive cross-layer coupling conditions, and trace twenty-plus enterprise controls to their classical constructs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T19:10:31Z)
• Foundation Protocol: A Coordination Layer for Agentic Society [78.01727114524464]
  Foundation Protocol (FP) is a graph-first coordination layer for an emerging human-AI society.<n>FP unifies heterogeneous entities, including agents, tools, resources, humans, institutions, and organizations.<n>The aim is to keep autonomous agency composable while keeping accountability non-negotiable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T04:20:35Z)
• From Assistance to Agency: Rethinking Autonomy and Control in CI/CD Pipelines [0.0]
  This paper presents a vision of agentic Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) in which the central challenge is not improving task performance but designing authority transfer.<n> Drawing on research prototypes and industrial platforms, we show that current systems operate mainly at the data plane under bounded autonomy.<n>We identify three recurring patterns: constrained autonomy as the dominant design, external governance as the primary safety mechanism, and a widening gap between deployment momentum and evaluation methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T00:15:43Z)
• When Agents Evolve, Institutions Follow [52.359340707289114]
  We argue that multi-agent systems built on large language models face the same challenge.<n>Their central problem is not only individual intelligence, but collective organization.<n>We translate seven historical political institutions, spanning four canonical governance patterns, into executable multi-agent architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T10:30:58Z)
• AgentCity: Constitutional Governance for Autonomous Agent Economies via Separation of Power [2.173754130697989]
  We term this the Logic Monopoly -- the agent society's unchecked monopoly over the entire logic chain.<n>We propose the Separation of Power (SoP) model, a constitutional governance architecture deployed on public blockchain.<n>In this architecture, smart contracts are the law itself -- the actual legislative output that agents produce and that governs their behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T12:28:20Z)
• Agents of Chaos [50.53354213047402]
  We report an exploratory red-teaming study of autonomous language-model-powered agents deployed in a live laboratory environment.<n>Twenty AI researchers interacted with the agents under benign and adversarial conditions.<n>Our findings establish the existence of security-, privacy-, and governance-relevant vulnerabilities in realistic deployment settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T16:28:48Z)
• Institutional AI: A Governance Framework for Distributional AGI Safety [1.3763052684269788]
  We identify three structural problems that emerge from core properties of AI models.<n>The solution is Institutional AI, a system-level approach that treats alignment as a question of effective governance of AI agent collectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T17:08:26Z)
• Democracy-in-Silico: Institutional Design as Alignment in AI-Governed Polities [2.1485350418225244]
  Democracy-in-Silico is an agent-based simulation where societies of advanced AI agents govern themselves under different institutional frameworks.<n>We explore what it means to be human in an age of AI by tasking Large Language Models (LLMs) to embody agents with traumatic memories, hidden agendas, and psychological triggers.<n>We present a novel metric, the Power-Preservation Index (PPI), to quantify misaligned behavior where agents prioritize their own power over public welfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T04:44:41Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Toward a Theory of Agents as Tool-Use Decision-Makers [89.26889709510242]
  We argue that true autonomy requires agents to be grounded in a coherent epistemic framework that governs what they know, what they need to know, and how to acquire that knowledge efficiently.<n>We propose a unified theory that treats internal reasoning and external actions as equivalent epistemic tools, enabling agents to systematically coordinate introspection and interaction.<n>This perspective shifts the design of agents from mere action executors to knowledge-driven intelligence systems, offering a principled path toward building foundation agents capable of adaptive, efficient, and goal-directed behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T07:52:16Z)
• Media and responsible AI governance: a game-theoretic and LLM analysis [61.132523071109354]
  This paper investigates the interplay between AI developers, regulators, users, and the media in fostering trustworthy AI systems.<n>Using evolutionary game theory and large language models (LLMs), we model the strategic interactions among these actors under different regulatory regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T21:39:38Z)
• Governing AI Agents [0.2913760942403036]
  Article looks at the economic theory of principal-agent problems and the common law doctrine of agency relationships.<n>It identifies problems arising from AI agents, including issues of information asymmetry, discretionary authority, and loyalty.<n>It argues that new technical and legal infrastructure is needed to support governance principles of inclusivity, visibility, and liability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T07:55:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.