LEACL: LLM-Enhanced Automatic Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning in Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23515v1
• Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 07:31:07 GMT
• Title: LEACL: LLM-Enhanced Automatic Curriculum Learning for Reinforcement Learning in Long-Horizon Manipulation Tasks
• Abstract summary: Long-horizon manipulation tasks pose significant challenges for reinforcement learning due to sparse reward signals and long horizons.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative by enabling the decomposition of complex tasks into meaningful subtasks.<n>LLMs are used to both decompose tasks into subtasks and to generate task-dependent specifications for each subtask.<n>These specifications are then used by ACL algorithms to guide learning using only sparse reward signals.
• Score: 18.85599517785148
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Long-horizon manipulation tasks pose significant challenges for reinforcement learning due to sparse reward signals and long horizons. Automatic curriculum learning (ACL) has been proposed to tackle these challenges by progressively training agents on a sequence of tasks, from easier to more difficult. However, the success of ACL depends heavily on task-dependent specifications-such as well-defined task parameter spaces and difficulty measures-which are often manually crafted and difficult to generalize across diverse tasks. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) offer a promising alternative by enabling the decomposition of complex tasks into meaningful subtasks using the LLMs' web-scale common-sense knowledge. This decomposition can provide a natural curriculum structure for efficient learning of long-horizon tasks. However, existing LLM-based methods typically rely on hand-designed dense reward functions to learn each subtask, which can introduce bias and still requires significant human supervision. In this work, we propose LLM-enhanced automatic curriculum learning (LEACL), a framework that integrates LLMs and ACL to address these limitations. Specifically, LLMs are used to both decompose tasks into subtasks and to generate task-dependent specifications for each subtask. These specifications are then used by ACL algorithms to guide learning using only sparse reward signals, eliminating the need for dense reward design. We evaluate LEACL on five long-horizon manipulation tasks from the LIBERO benchmark. LEACL achieves better asymptotic performance in terms of the success rates compared to human-designed dense rewards.

Related papers

• How Many Parameters Does Your Task Really Need? Task Specific Pruning with LLM-Sieve [2.33361323991006]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for narrow tasks in resource-constrained settings.<n>We present LLM-Sieve, a framework that prunes LLMs down to the minimal parameter subset needed to preserve task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T20:17:20Z)
• Option Discovery Using LLM-guided Semantic Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning [16.654435148168172]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable promise in reasoning and decision-making.<n>We propose an LLM-guided hierarchical RL framework, termed LDSC, to enhance sample efficiency, generalization, and multi-task adaptability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T15:49:56Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Efficient Prompting for LLM-based Generative Internet of Things [88.84327500311464]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capacities on various tasks, and integrating the capacities of LLMs into the Internet of Things (IoT) applications has drawn much research attention recently. Due to security concerns, many institutions avoid accessing state-of-the-art commercial LLM services, requiring the deployment and utilization of open-source LLMs in a local network setting. We propose a LLM-based Generative IoT (GIoT) system deployed in the local network setting in this study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T19:24:00Z)
• Distilling Instruction-following Abilities of Large Language Models with Task-aware Curriculum Planning [12.651588927599441]
  Instruction tuning aims to align large language models with open-domain instructions and human-preferred responses. We introduce Task-Aware Curriculum Planning for Instruction Refinement (TAPIR) to select instructions that are difficult for a student LLM to follow. To balance the student's capabilities, task distributions in training sets are adjusted with responses automatically refined according to their corresponding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T08:38:26Z)
• Small LLMs Are Weak Tool Learners: A Multi-LLM Agent [73.54562551341454]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents significantly extend the capabilities of standalone LLMs. We propose a novel approach that decomposes the aforementioned capabilities into a planner, caller, and summarizer. This modular framework facilitates individual updates and the potential use of smaller LLMs for building each capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T16:17:07Z)
• When does In-context Learning Fall Short and Why? A Study on Specification-Heavy Tasks [54.71034943526973]
  In-context learning (ICL) has become the default method for using large language models (LLMs) We find that ICL falls short of handling specification-heavy tasks, which are tasks with complicated and extensive task specifications. We identify three primary reasons: inability to specifically understand context, misalignment in task schema comprehension with humans, and inadequate long-text understanding ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T14:26:30Z)
• TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Models [52.734140807634624]
  Aligned large language models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in task-solving, following instructions, and ensuring safety. Existing continual learning benchmarks lack sufficient challenge for leading aligned LLMs. We introduce TRACE, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate continual learning in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T16:38:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.