Offline-Online Curriculum RL for Multimodal Reasoning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23700v1
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 14:47:47 GMT
- Title: Offline-Online Curriculum RL for Multimodal Reasoning
- Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models exhibit capabilities on reasoning tasks, yet often produce flawed intermediate steps while yielding correct final answers.<n>We propose $O2$-CritiCuRL, a novel curriculum reinforcement learning framework that introduces critical-step awareness.<n>In the offline stage, $O2$-CritiCuRL conducts multi-rollout analysis over step-annotated trajectories to estimate step-level importance.<n>In the online stage, we employ a progressive step-level reinforcement learning strategy, where truncated chains guide the model to infer missing steps and refine its reasoning.
- Score: 28.712061130761654
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Multimodal large language models exhibit capabilities on reasoning tasks, yet often produce flawed intermediate steps while yielding correct final answers. This behavior undermines interpretability and reliability, suggesting reliance on spurious shortcuts rather than faithful reasoning. Although efforts have explored step-level supervision, distinguishing decisive steps from redundant ones remains challenging. We propose $O^2$-CritiCuRL, a novel curriculum reinforcement learning framework that introduces critical-step awareness through an iterative offline-online paradigm. In the offline stage, $O^2$-CritiCuRL conducts multi-rollout analysis over step-annotated trajectories to estimate step-level importance, allowing the framework to distill critical reasoning steps and filter out redundant ones. In the online stage, we employ a progressive step-level reinforcement learning strategy, where truncated chains guide the model to infer missing steps and refine its reasoning, thereby sharpening its focus on critical steps and overcoming the limitations of static supervision. Extensive experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance while delivering superior training and inference efficiency. Code is available at https://github.com/kk0013/CritiCuRL.
Related papers
- STRIDE: Learnable Stepwise Language Feedback for LLM Reasoning [80.78140312980484]
We propose language-driven stepwise trajectory redirection, termed as STRIDE.<n>We co-train a generator and a generative verifier using only outcome-based rewards, eliminating external annotations.<n> Experiments on diverse reasoning benchmarks show that STRIDE significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T11:04:31Z) - Reasoning Fails Where Step Flow Breaks [9.62455367512369]
We introduce Step-Saliency, which pools attention--gradient scores into step-to-step maps along the question--thinking--summary trajectory.<n>Across several models, Step-Saliency reveals two recurring information-flow failures: Shallow Lock-in and Deep Decay.<n>We propose StepFlow, a saliency-inspired test-time intervention that adjusts shallow saliency patterns measured by Step-Saliency via Odds-Equal Bridge and adds a small step-level residual in deep layers via Step Momentum Injection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-08T05:21:13Z) - Stop Rewarding Hallucinated Steps: Faithfulness-Aware Step-Level Reinforcement Learning for Small Reasoning Models [59.6715047267181]
Small reasoning models (SRMs) are prone to hallucinations, especially in intermediate reasoning steps.<n>Existing mitigation methods based on online reinforcement learning rely on outcome-based rewards or coarse-grained chain-of-thought evaluation.<n>We propose Faithfulness-Aware Step-Level Reinforcement Learning (FaithRL), introducing step-level supervision via explicit faithfulness rewards from a process reward model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T17:15:12Z) - Provable Benefit of Curriculum in Transformer Tree-Reasoning Post-Training [76.12556589212666]
We show that curriculum post-training avoids the exponential complexity bottleneck.<n>Under outcome-only reward signals, reinforcement learning finetuning achieves high accuracy with sample complexity.<n>We establish guarantees for test-time scaling, where curriculum-aware querying reduces both reward oracle calls and sampling cost from exponential to order.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T18:29:54Z) - StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning [52.32416311990343]
Process reward models address this by providing step-by-step feedback.<n>Inspired by recent advances, we reframe stepwise reward modeling from a classification task to a reasoning task itself.<n>We show it provides (i) better judgment accuracy on intermediate steps than existing methods; (ii) can be used to improve the policy model at training time; and (iii) improves inference-time search.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-26T17:45:05Z) - SmartThinker: Learning to Compress and Preserve Reasoning by Step-Level Length Control [5.224609066309358]
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities through inference-time scaling.<n>Previous work has attempted to mitigate this issue by penalizing the overall length of generated samples during reinforcement learning.<n>We propose SmartThinker, a two-stage learnable framework designed to enable fine-grained control over the length of reasoning chains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T11:21:47Z) - Stepwise Perplexity-Guided Refinement for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [56.37421741507468]
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning has significantly enhanced the performance of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose a method to identify critical reasoning steps using perplexity as a measure of their importance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T20:04:51Z) - Step-KTO: Optimizing Mathematical Reasoning through Stepwise Binary Feedback [94.25162866972077]
Step-KTO is a training framework that combines process-level and outcome-level binary feedback.<n>Our experiments show that Step-KTO significantly improves both final answer accuracy and the quality of intermediate reasoning steps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-18T15:38:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.