LLM-Based vs. Lexicon-Based Sentiment Signals for Tail-Risk Detection in Meme Stocks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24072v1
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 07:16:12 GMT
- Title: LLM-Based vs. Lexicon-Based Sentiment Signals for Tail-Risk Detection in Meme Stocks
- Abstract summary: This paper presents an empirical comparison of lexicon-based and Large Language Model (LLM)-based sentiment analysis.<n>We construct time-aligned sentiment indicators and evaluate their relationship with market returns.<n>The results indicate that LLM-derived indicators provide a richer multidimensional representation and exhibit stronger asset-specific statistical structure than the lexicon-based baseline.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper presents an empirical comparison of lexicon-based and Large Language Model (LLM)-based sentiment analysis for extracting market-relevant signals from social media discourse in highly volatile equity markets. Using Reddit data from r/WallStreetBets and focusing on meme stocks (GME, AMC, NOK), we construct time-aligned sentiment indicators and evaluate their relationship with market returns, with particular attention to extreme positive return events in the upper tail of the return distribution. The LLM-based approach generates multidimensional sentiment representations capturing emotional polarity, bullishness, sarcasm likelihood, and topical relevance, whereas the baseline relies on the VADER lexicon-based model. We evaluate both approaches using lead/lag correlation analysis, OLS regression, ROC-AUC-based directional classification, and a quantile-based early-warning framework. The results indicate that LLM-derived indicators provide a richer multidimensional representation and exhibit stronger asset-specific statistical structure than the lexicon-based baseline. However, their relationship with market movements remains heterogeneous across assets, suggesting that increased linguistic expressiveness does not necessarily translate into stable forecasting performance in retail-driven volatility regimes.
Related papers
- Listen to the Latents: Self-Correcting Speech Recognition in Large Audio Language Models Through Hidden-State Interactions [120.64235456332916]
Speech recognition systems increasingly integrate large language models (LLMs) to leverage their semantic knowledge.<n>We refine warm-adapted LLM-based ASR models by leveraging their own pre-adaptation base LLMs.<n>We propose Hybrid Search, a targeted correction strategy motivated by two observations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-31T15:46:48Z) - Deliberate Evolution: Agentic Reasoning for Sample-Efficient Symbolic Regression with LLMs [52.89778838903305]
Deliberate Evolution (DE) is an agentic framework that decouples symbolic generation from search control.<n>Experiments on LLM-SRBench show that DE consistently outperforms representative LLM-based SR baselines across diverse scientific domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-03T02:22:16Z) - Programmatic Context Augmentation for LLM-based Symbolic Regression [65.01826333382738]
Large language model (LLM)-based evolutionary search methods have been introduced into Symbolic regression.<n>We propose a novel LLM-based evolutionary search framework that incorporates programmatic context augmentation.<n>By enabling code-based interactions with the dataset, our method can actively perform data analysis and extract informative signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-04T19:34:03Z) - Injecting Distributional Awareness into MLLMs via Reinforcement Learning for Deep Imbalanced Regression [16.736095491915723]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) struggle with numerical regression under long-tailed target distributions.<n>We propose a distribution-aware reinforcement learning framework based on Group Relative Policy Optimization.<n>Experiments on a unified suite of long-tailed regression benchmarks show consistent improvements over SFT and existing MLLM regression methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-02T11:49:03Z) - On the Robustness of LLM-Based Dense Retrievers: A Systematic Analysis of Generalizability and Stability [25.692340232648366]
We present the first systematic study of the robustness of state-of-the-art open-source LLM-based dense retrievers.<n>For generalizability, we evaluate retrieval effectiveness across four benchmarks spanning 30 datasets.<n>For stability, we assess model resilience against both unintentional query variations and malicious adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-17T13:02:29Z) - Objective Mispricing Detection for Shortlisting Undervalued Football Players via Market Dynamics and News Signals [1.6312989763677892]
We present a practical, reproducible framework for identifying undervalued football players grounded in objective mispricing.<n>We estimate an expected market value from structured data (historical market dynamics, biographical and contract features, transfer history) and compare it to the observed valuation to define mispricing.<n>We then assess whether news-derived Natural Language Processing (NLP) features complement market signals for shortlisting undervalued players.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T13:03:23Z) - MarketGANs: Multivariate financial time-series data augmentation using generative adversarial networks [4.104902299123294]
MarketGAN is a factor-based generative framework for high-dimensional asset return generation under severe data scarcity.<n>We embed an explicit asset-pricing factor structure as an economic inductive bias and generate returns as a single joint vector.<n>Using daily returns of large U.S. equities, we find that MarketGAN more closely matches empirical stylized facts of asset returns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-25T10:19:04Z) - Adaptive Financial Sentiment Analysis for NIFTY 50 via Instruction-Tuned LLMs , RAG and Reinforcement Learning Approaches [1.9116784879310027]
Existing works in financial sentiment analysis have not considered the impact of stock prices or market feedback on sentiment analysis.<n>We propose an adaptive framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) with real-world stock market feedback to improve sentiment classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-23T06:27:12Z) - How Do LLM-Generated Texts Impact Term-Based Retrieval Models? [76.92519309816008]
This paper investigates the influence of large language models (LLMs) on term-based retrieval models.<n>Our linguistic analysis reveals that LLM-generated texts exhibit smoother high-frequency and steeper low-frequency Zipf slopes.<n>Our study further explores whether term-based retrieval models demonstrate source bias, concluding that these models prioritize documents whose term distributions closely correspond to those of the queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-25T06:43:27Z) - Regression-aware Inference with LLMs [52.764328080398805]
We show that an inference strategy can be sub-optimal for common regression and scoring evaluation metrics.
We propose alternate inference strategies that estimate the Bayes-optimal solution for regression and scoring metrics in closed-form from sampled responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-07T03:24:34Z) - Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language
Models [52.15056231665816]
We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs)
We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence.
We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T17:59:09Z) - A Sentiment Analysis Approach to the Prediction of Market Volatility [62.997667081978825]
We have explored the relationship between sentiment extracted from financial news and tweets and FTSE100 movements.
The sentiment captured from news headlines could be used as a signal to predict market returns; the same does not apply for volatility.
We developed an accurate classifier for the prediction of market volatility in response to the arrival of new information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T01:15:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.