Bigger or Cheaper? Scale and Quantization Effects on Uncertainty Signals in Vision-Language Models Under Image Degradation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24440v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 13:47:44 GMT
• Title: Bigger or Cheaper? Scale and Quantization Effects on Uncertainty Signals in Vision-Language Models Under Image Degradation
• Abstract summary: We measure, on identical inputs, how model scale and 4-bit quantization affect two confidence signals in the Qwen2-VL family.<n>We find that scale sharply improves the model's internal uncertainty signal.<n>We argue that error-detection AUROC, not calibration error, is the metric that exposes the difference between the two signals.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) deployed on consumer hardware must decide when to answer and when to defer, and that decision depends on having a confidence signal that tracks correctness. A practitioner with a fixed memory budget faces a choice between a small model at full precision, the same small model quantized, and a larger model quantized into the same footprint -- three configurations that push the confidence signal in opposing directions. We measure, on identical inputs, how model scale and 4-bit quantization affect two confidence signals in the Qwen2-VL family: the confidence a model states in natural language, and its own mean token probability over the answer it generates. Across 5,700 predictions spanning six realistic photographic degradations at three severities, we find that scale sharply improves the model's internal uncertainty signal (mean error-detection AUROC 0.80 to 0.98 from 2B to 7B) while its verbalized confidence stays weak and often at chance (mean 0.61 to 0.69): the gap between what the model knows and what it says widens rather than closes with size. We find that 4-bit quantization is nearly free for accuracy (-1.6 points) but expensive for the confidence signal (internal AUROC 0.95 to 0.80, and the verbalized-confidence parse rate collapses from 99% to 64%). For a fixed memory budget the recommendation is therefore to prefer a larger quantized model over a smaller full-precision one: 7B-4bit gives both the best accuracy and the best uncertainty signal (internal AUROC 0.98) of the three configurations that fit. We frame the results as selective-prediction operating points so they translate directly into a deployment recommendation, and we argue that error-detection AUROC, not calibration error, is the metric that exposes the difference between the two signals.

Related papers

• HalluPrism: When Multimodal Uncertainty Should Diagnose, Not Decide [18.50218795316691]
  We propose HalluPrism, a behavioral diagnostic that re-runs an answer after visual degradation, blank-image replacement, and grounding or relation checks.<n>These targeted probes yield a signature over visual-perturbation sensitivity, image-removal confidence retention, and grounding/relation-probe instability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-29T11:06:37Z)
• Accurate Ensembles, Fragile Narratives: Multi-Scale Stacking and a Fidelity Audit of LLM-Generated Explanations for Credit Risk [0.0]
  Credit scoring increasingly relies on models whose decision logic cannot be read off their parameters.<n>A common proposal closes that gap with a language model: compute feature attributions, hand them to an LLM, and let it write the rationale.<n>We build such a system end to end and test whether the second half of the promise holds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T13:22:14Z)
• Small Vision-Language Models Know When They Are Wrong But Cannot Say So: A Two-Model Study of Stated versus Internal Confidence Under Realistic Image Degradation [0.0]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed on consumer hardware where input images are degraded by compression, camera shake, and poor lighting.<n>We evaluate two small open-weight VLMs -- Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct and SmolVLM-Instruct -- across six realistic photographic degradations at three severity levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T07:00:32Z)
• CaliDist: Calibrating Large Language Models via Behavioral Robustness to Distraction [51.56484100374058]
  Existing calibration methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) often overlook a critical dimension of trustworthiness: a model's behavioral robustness.<n>We introduce textscCaliDist, a novel post-hoc calibration approach that directly measures and penalizes a model's susceptibility to distraction.<n>textscCaliDist consistently achieves lower Expected Error (ECE) and Brier Score compared with strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T07:27:53Z)
• Normalized Architectures are Natively 4-Bit [49.13186675123547]
  nGPT, an architecture that constrains weights and hidden representations to the unit hypersphere, is inherently more robust to low-precision arithmetic.<n>We validate this approach on both a 1.2B dense model and hybrid (Mamba-Transformer) MoE models of up to 3B/30B parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T11:54:07Z)
• What Single-Prompt Accuracy Misses: A Multi-Variant Reliability Audit of Language Models [0.0]
  Single-prompt accuracy is the dominant way to benchmark language models, but it can miss reliability failures that matter.<n>We evaluate a 15-model open-weight corpus, with the main reliability analyses focused on 10 instruct models across five classification and reasoning benchmarks.<n>We find three broad results. First, evaluation design can materially change the conclusion.<n>Second, confidence signals are fragile. On MMLU-Pro, every primary model verbally reports confidence substantially above both its accuracy and its token-probability confidence on the same rows, and verbal parse rate can collapse for a single model on a single prompt variant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-03T20:05:08Z)
• MIRROR: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Metacognitive Calibration in Large Language Models [0.0]
  MIRROR is a benchmark that evaluates whether large language models can use self-knowledge to make better decisions.<n>We evaluate 16 models from 8 labs across approximately 250,000 evaluation instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T08:41:12Z)
• Evaluating Small Language Models for Front-Door Routing: A Harmonized Benchmark and Synthetic-Traffic Experiment [0.05586191108738562]
  Small language models (SLMs) have sufficient reasoning capability for sub-second, zero-marginal-cost, self-hosted task classification.<n>Study 1 is a harmonized offline benchmark of Phi-3.5-mini, Qwen2.5-1.5B, and Qwen-2.5-3B on identical Azure T4 hardware, serving stack, quantization, and a fixed 60-case corpus.<n>Study 2 is a pre-registered four-arm randomized experiment under synthetic traffic with an effective sample size of 60 unique cases per arm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T15:57:46Z)
• VB: Visibility Benchmark for Visibility and Perspective Reasoning in Images [0.0]
  We present VB, a benchmark that tests whether vision-language models can determine what is and is not visible in a photograph.<n>Items are organized into 100 families using a 2x2 design that crosses a minimal image edit with a minimal text edit.<n>We score models on confidence-aware accuracy with abstention (CAA), minimal-edit flip rate (MEFR), confidence-ranked selective prediction (SelRank), and second-order perspective reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T23:03:11Z)
• Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance Reduction [56.360865951192324]
  When fine-tuning zero-shot models, our desideratum is for the fine-tuned model to excel in both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) We propose a sample-wise ensembling technique that can simultaneously attain the best ID and OOD accuracy without the trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T13:13:39Z)
• Proximity-Informed Calibration for Deep Neural Networks [49.330703634912915]
  ProCal is a plug-and-play algorithm with a theoretical guarantee to adjust sample confidence based on proximity. We show that ProCal is effective in addressing proximity bias and improving calibration on balanced, long-tail, and distribution-shift settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T16:40:51Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Camera Pose Estimation from Points and Lines [101.03675842534415]
  Perspective-n-Point-and-Line (Pn$PL) aims at fast, accurate and robust camera localizations with respect to a 3D model from 2D-3D feature coordinates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-08T15:19:36Z)
• Probing Model Signal-Awareness via Prediction-Preserving Input Minimization [67.62847721118142]
  We evaluate models' ability to capture the correct vulnerability signals to produce their predictions. We measure the signal awareness of models using a new metric we propose- Signal-aware Recall (SAR) The results show a sharp drop in the model's Recall from the high 90s to sub-60s with the new metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T20:05:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.