Evaluating Fuzz Testing for Reinforcement Learning Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24577v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:46:57 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Fuzz Testing for Reinforcement Learning Agents
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, and drone control.<n>Fuzz testing has emerged as a promising method for exploring the vast state spaces of RL agents and exposing crashes.<n>This study systematically evaluates RL fuzzing methods from four complementary perspectives: effectiveness, diversity, efficiency, and practical utility.
• Score: 8.802650230584762
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains such as robotics, autonomous driving, and drone control, where unexpected behaviors may lead to severe real-world consequences. Fuzz testing has recently emerged as a promising method for exploring the vast state spaces of RL agents and exposing crashes. Although numerous RL fuzzing methods have been proposed, existing studies often differ in evaluation settings, baselines, and metrics, making it difficult to draw reliable conclusions about their relative effectiveness and practical usefulness. To address this gap, we present the first comprehensive empirical study that systematically evaluates RL fuzzing methods from four complementary perspectives: effectiveness, diversity, efficiency, and practical utility. We benchmark five state-of-the-art methods alongside random testing under unified configurations across three environments of increasing complexity (MountainCar, BipedalWalker, and CARLA), and further assess the downstream usefulness of detected crashes for agent robustness improvement and safety monitoring. Our results reveal several key insights. For instance,throughput-oriented methods like MDPFuzz demonstrate superior effectiveness and efficiency in crash discovery, while methods explicitly designed to encourage exploration like SeqDivFuzz excel at uncovering diverse crash behaviors. We also show that fuzzing-generated crashes can meaningfully improve agent robustness and enable accurate safety monitoring with strong cross-method generalization. Beyond these empirical findings, we distill actionable guidance for both researchers and practitioners, highlighting the benefits of combining complementary fuzzing strategies and adopting multi-level diversity analysis to achieve more comprehensive and practical RL testing.

Related papers

• ARISE-RL: Agentic Rubric-Grounded Iterative Self-Evolution with Reinforcement Learning [74.19730275669227]
  ARISE-RL is a novel full-cycle self-evolution framework for training open-ended agents.<n>We present Reward-Gated Self-Evolution Distillation (RG-SED), which distills a memory-augmented variant of the same policy back into itself.<n>We also present ECR-Bench, an expert-calibrated rubric benchmark suite covering single-tool deep research and multi-tool travel planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-01T10:54:13Z)
• ProCeedRL: Process Critic with Exploratory Demonstration Reinforcement Learning for LLM Agentic Reasoning [13.041618832271737]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of large language models.<n>Applying it to multi-turn agentic tasks remains challenging due to the long-horizon nature of interactions.<n>We propose ProCeedRL: Process Critic with Explorative Demonstration RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-02T13:10:06Z)
• RetroAgent: From Solving to Evolving via Retrospective Dual Intrinsic Feedback [54.39884046754265]
  RetroAgent is an online RL framework that enables agents to master complex interactive environments.<n>Our experiments show that RetroAgent achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T16:23:33Z)
• FIRE-Bench: Evaluating Agents on the Rediscovery of Scientific Insights [63.32178443510396]
  We introduce FIRE-Bench (Full-cycle Insight Rediscovery Evaluation), a benchmark that evaluates agents through the rediscovery of established findings.<n>Even the strongest agents achieve limited rediscovery success (50 F1), exhibit high variance across runs, and display recurring failure modes in experimental design, execution, and evidence-based reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T23:21:13Z)
• Improving Deepfake Detection with Reinforcement Learning-Based Adaptive Data Augmentation [60.04281435591454]
  CRDA (Curriculum Reinforcement-Learning Data Augmentation) is a novel framework guiding detectors to progressively master multi-domain forgery features.<n>Central to our approach is integrating reinforcement learning and causal inference.<n>Our method significantly improves detector generalizability, outperforming SOTA methods across multiple cross-domain datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T12:45:52Z)
• Anomalous Decision Discovery using Inverse Reinforcement Learning [3.3675535571071746]
  Anomaly detection plays a critical role in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) by identifying unusual behaviors through perception systems.<n>Current approaches, which often rely on predefined thresholds or supervised learning paradigms, exhibit reduced efficacy when confronted with unseen scenarios.<n>We present Trajectory-Reward Guided Adaptive Pre-training (TRAP), a novel IRL framework for anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T17:01:02Z)
• Preference-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques [65.55451717632317]
  We study Preference-Based Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (PbMARL)<n>We identify the Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games.<n>Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for PbMARL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-01T13:14:41Z)
• Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis [63.532413807686524]
  This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL) We propose a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T16:09:43Z)
• Dealing with uncertainty: balancing exploration and exploitation in deep recurrent reinforcement learning [0.0]
  Incomplete knowledge of the environment leads an agent to make decisions under uncertainty. One of the major dilemmas in Reinforcement Learning (RL) where an autonomous agent has to balance two contrasting needs in making its decisions. We show that adaptive methods better approximate the trade-off between exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T13:45:33Z)
• DEFENDER: DTW-Based Episode Filtering Using Demonstrations for Enhancing RL Safety [0.0]
  We propose a task-agnostic method that leverages small sets of safe and unsafe demonstrations to improve the safety of RL agents during learning. We evaluate our method on three tasks from OpenAI Gym's Mujoco benchmark and two state-of-the-art RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T14:23:27Z)
• Evaluating Model-free Reinforcement Learning toward Safety-critical Tasks [70.76757529955577]
  This paper revisits prior work in this scope from the perspective of state-wise safe RL. We propose Unrolling Safety Layer (USL), a joint method that combines safety optimization and safety projection. To facilitate further research in this area, we reproduce related algorithms in a unified pipeline and incorporate them into SafeRL-Kit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T06:30:17Z)
• Exploring Inconsistent Knowledge Distillation for Object Detection with Data Augmentation [66.25738680429463]
  Knowledge Distillation (KD) for object detection aims to train a compact detector by transferring knowledge from a teacher model. We propose inconsistent knowledge distillation (IKD) which aims to distill knowledge inherent in the teacher model's counter-intuitive perceptions. Our method outperforms state-of-the-art KD baselines on one-stage, two-stage and anchor-free object detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T16:36:28Z)
• Ablation Study of How Run Time Assurance Impacts the Training and Performance of Reinforcement Learning Agents [5.801944210870593]
  We conduct an ablation study using evaluation best practices to investigate the impact of run time assurance (RTA) on effective learning. Our conclusions shed light on the most promising directions of Safe Reinforcement Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-08T20:15:15Z)
• Neural Network Repair with Reachability Analysis [10.384532888747993]
  Safety is a critical concern for the next generation of autonomy that is likely to rely heavily on deep neural networks for perception and control. This research proposes a framework to repair unsafe DNNs in safety-critical systems with reachability analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T17:56:51Z)
• Robust Deep Reinforcement Learning through Adversarial Loss [74.20501663956604]
  Recent studies have shown that deep reinforcement learning agents are vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations on the agent's inputs. We propose RADIAL-RL, a principled framework to train reinforcement learning agents with improved robustness against adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-05T07:49:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.