Three Sides of Retrieval: Factorial Evidence for Document-Side, Query-Side, and Answer-Side Complementarity in RAG

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.24781v1
• Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:33:01 GMT
• Title: Three Sides of Retrieval: Factorial Evidence for Document-Side, Query-Side, and Answer-Side Complementarity in RAG
• Abstract summary: ToC-guided page retrieval infers headings from visual formatting without LLM calls, embeds them as a parallel index, and loads full page sections.<n>Across 1,280 conditions on 8 enterprise documents, we find ToC is a significant main effect on answer quality.<n>ToC contributes 20% of citations despite adding only 2.9 pages per query.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: RAG systems rely on chunking, which destroys structural information in documents. Existing heading-based retrieval (Jeong et al., 2025) requires multiple LLM calls per document and returns sub-chunks within matched sections. We introduce ToC-guided page retrieval, which infers headings from visual formatting without LLM calls, embeds them as a parallel index, and loads full page sections. Across 1,280 conditions on 8 enterprise documents (5 to 195 pages), we find: (1) ToC is a significant main effect on answer quality (d = +0.41, p = 0.031), with the largest gains in completeness (+0.40) and usefulness (+0.40); (2) combined with answer-side verification, it outperforms query-side decomposition + verification (d = +0.32, p = 0.036); (3) ToC contributes 20% of citations despite adding only 2.9 pages per query; (4) gains are directionally larger on longer documents (up to +1.50 on 118 pages), though the trend does not reach significance with 8 documents; and (5) a 480-condition sensitivity analysis finds no significant parameter effects (all p > 0.38), confirming defaults are near-optimal. The contribution is both methodological (a new zero-LLM-cost retrieval algorithm) and empirical: factorial evidence that document-side, query-side, and answer-side enhancements are complementary, a three-way interaction not previously studied.

Related papers

• VisDocAgentBench: Benchmarking Agents for Visually Rich Document Retrieval [65.89247522243959]
  VisDocAgentBench is a closed-corpus benchmark comparing static and agentic retrieval under a ranked-output contract.<n>It contains 2,375 pages from 100 documents and 120 unique-target queries balanced across direct, one-bridge, and two-bridge evidence structures.<n>A strong late-interaction visual retriever reaches 97.50% Recall@1 on direct items but 2.50% on two-bridge items, exposing the limits of query--target matching when relevance depends on corpus context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T15:23:06Z)
• Novelty-Aware Agentic Retrieval: Comparing Research Contributions Through Structured Multi-Step Reasoning [0.0]
  Novelty-Aware Research Agent is a prototype agentic retrieval system.<n>It layers structured multi-step reasoning on a RAG pipeline through six typed-contract components.<n>It produces structured comparison artifacts: per-paper contribution records, paper-level overlaps, and a problem x method gap matrix.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-20T17:04:02Z)
• Doc-V*:Coarse-to-Fine Interactive Visual Reasoning for Multi-Page Document VQA [71.42483000929614]
  Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents.<n>We propose Doc-$V*$, an textbfOCR-free agentic framework that casts multi-page DocVQA as sequential evidence aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T11:12:27Z)
• Cross-Document Topic-Aligned Chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [0.0]
  Cross-Document Topic-Aligned chunking reconstructs knowledge at the corpus level.<n>It first identifies topics across documents, maps segments to each topic, and synthesizes them into unified chunks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-08T11:45:45Z)
• Zero-Shot Document Understanding using Pseudo Table of Contents-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.875345207589195]
  DocsRay is a training-free document understanding system.<n>It integrates pseudo Table of Contents (TOC) generation with hierarchical Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T03:14:45Z)
• MonkeyOCR: Document Parsing with a Structure-Recognition-Relation Triplet Paradigm [60.14048367611333]
  MonkeyOCR is a vision-language model for document parsing.<n>It advances the state of the art by leveraging a Structure-Recognition-Relation (SRR) triplet paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T16:34:57Z)
• Document Attribution: Examining Citation Relationships using Large Language Models [62.46146670035751]
  We propose a zero-shot approach that frames attribution as a straightforward textual entailment task.<n>We also explore the role of the attention mechanism in enhancing the attribution process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T04:40:11Z)
• ECLIPSE: Contrastive Dimension Importance Estimation with Pseudo-Irrelevance Feedback for Dense Retrieval [14.72046677914345]
  Recent advances in Information Retrieval have leveraged high-dimensional embedding spaces to improve the retrieval of relevant documents.<n>Despite these high-dimensional representations, documents relevant to a query reside on a lower-dimensional, query-dependent manifold.<n>We propose a novel methodology that addresses these limitations by leveraging information from both relevant and non-relevant documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T15:45:06Z)
• BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval [54.54576644403115]
  We introduce BRIGHT, the first text retrieval benchmark that requires intensive reasoning to retrieve relevant documents.<n>Our dataset consists of 1,384 real-world queries spanning diverse domains, such as economics, psychology, mathematics, and coding.<n>We show that incorporating explicit reasoning about the query improves retrieval performance by up to 12.2 points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T17:58:27Z)
• MMLongBench-Doc: Benchmarking Long-context Document Understanding with Visualizations [105.10376440302076]
  This work presents MMLongBench-Doc, a long-context, multi-modal benchmark comprising 1,062 expert-annotated questions. It is constructed upon 130 lengthy PDF-formatted documents with an average of 49.4 pages and 20,971 textual tokens. Experiments on 14 LVLMs demonstrate that long-context DU greatly challenges current models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:59:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.