Document Attribution: Examining Citation Relationships using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06324v1
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 04:40:11 GMT
• Title: Document Attribution: Examining Citation Relationships using Large Language Models
• Authors: Vipula Rawte, Ryan A. Rossi, Franck Dernoncourt, Nedim Lipka,
• Abstract summary: We propose a zero-shot approach that frames attribution as a straightforward textual entailment task.<n>We also explore the role of the attention mechanism in enhancing the attribution process.
• Score: 62.46146670035751
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to document-based tasks - such as document summarization, question answering, and information extraction - where user requirements focus on retrieving information from provided documents rather than relying on the model's parametric knowledge, ensuring the trustworthiness and interpretability of these systems has become a critical concern. A central approach to addressing this challenge is attribution, which involves tracing the generated outputs back to their source documents. However, since LLMs can produce inaccurate or imprecise responses, it is crucial to assess the reliability of these citations. To tackle this, our work proposes two techniques. (1) A zero-shot approach that frames attribution as a straightforward textual entailment task. Our method using flan-ul2 demonstrates an improvement of 0.27% and 2.4% over the best baseline of ID and OOD sets of AttributionBench, respectively. (2) We also explore the role of the attention mechanism in enhancing the attribution process. Using a smaller LLM, flan-t5-small, the F1 scores outperform the baseline across almost all layers except layer 4 and layers 8 through 11.

Related papers

• Beyond Isolated Dots: Benchmarking Structured Table Construction as Deep Knowledge Extraction [28.47810405584841]
  Arranged and Organized Extraction Benchmark designed to evaluate ability of large language models to comprehend fragmented documents.<n>AOE includes 11 carefully crafted tasks across three diverse domains, requiring models to generate context-specific schema tailored to varied input queries.<n>Results show that even the most advanced models struggled significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-22T06:37:51Z)
• Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Language-Model-Based Information Retriever via Query-Document Co-Augmentation [35.70731674603417]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>We present an LLM-based retriever empowered to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>Our approach significantly enhances LLM-based retrieval performance in both sparse and dense settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T14:14:43Z)
• Cite Pretrain: Retrieval-Free Knowledge Attribution for Large Language Models [53.17363502535395]
  Trustworthy language models should provide both correct and verifiable answers.<n>Current systems insert citations by querying an external retriever at inference time.<n>We propose Active Indexing, which continually pretrains on synthetic QA pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T04:48:05Z)
• LAQuer: Localized Attribution Queries in Content-grounded Generation [69.60308443863606]
  Grounded text generation models often produce content that deviates from their source material, requiring user verification to ensure accuracy.<n>Existing attribution methods associate entire sentences with source documents, which can be overwhelming for users seeking to fact-check specific claims.<n>We introduce Localized Attribution Queries (LAQuer), a new task that localizes selected spans of generated output to their corresponding source spans, allowing fine-grained and user-directed attribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T21:46:23Z)
• A RAG-Based Institutional Assistant [0.1499944454332829]
  We design and evaluate a RAG-based virtual assistant specifically tailored for the University of Sao Paulo.<n>Our optimal retriever model achieves a Top-5 accuracy of 30%, while our most effective generative model scores 22.04% against ground truth answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-23T17:54:19Z)
• Harnessing Large Language Models for Knowledge Graph Question Answering via Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-Augmentation [81.18701211912779]
  We introduce an Adaptive Multi-Aspect Retrieval-augmented over KGs (Amar) framework.<n>This method retrieves knowledge including entities, relations, and subgraphs, and converts each piece of retrieved text into prompt embeddings.<n>Our method has achieved state-of-the-art performance on two common datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T16:38:04Z)
• Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants [58.32043134560244]
  LLMs can help humans working with long documents, but are known to hallucinate. Existing approaches to attribution have only been evaluated in RAG settings, where the initial retrieval confounds LLM performance. This is crucially different from the long document setting, where retrieval is not needed, but could help. We present LAB, a benchmark of 6 diverse long document tasks with attribution, and experiments with different approaches to attribution on 5 LLMs of different sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-10T16:16:02Z)
• CaLM: Contrasting Large and Small Language Models to Verify Grounded Generation [76.31621715032558]
  Grounded generation aims to equip language models (LMs) with the ability to produce more credible and accountable responses. We introduce CaLM, a novel verification framework. Our framework empowers smaller LMs, which rely less on parametric memory, to validate the output of larger LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T06:04:55Z)
• Learning from Litigation: Graphs and LLMs for Retrieval and Reasoning in eDiscovery [6.037276428689637]
  This paper introduces DISCOvery Graph (DISCOG), a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of two worlds: a graph-based method for accurate document relevance prediction. Our approach drastically reduces document review costs by 99.9% compared to manual processes and by 95% compared to LLM-based classification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T15:08:55Z)
• WebCiteS: Attributed Query-Focused Summarization on Chinese Web Search Results with Citations [34.99831757956635]
  We formulate the task of attributed query-focused summarization (AQFS) and present WebCiteS, a Chinese dataset featuring 7k human-annotated summaries with citations. We tackle these issues by developing detailed metrics and enabling the automatic evaluator to decompose the sentences into sub-claims for fine-grained verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:06:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.