Leak-Free Cross-Validated Stacking with Per-Architecture Calibration for Sand-Boil Segmentation in Earthen Levees
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25367v1
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:21:02 GMT
- Title: Leak-Free Cross-Validated Stacking with Per-Architecture Calibration for Sand-Boil Segmentation in Earthen Levees
- Abstract summary: Sand boils, points where water seeping beneath an earthen levee re-emerges at the surface, are early warnings of internal erosion.<n>Deep segmentation networks are increasingly used to find them in inspection photographs.<n>Two common ways of working around that scarcity quietly inflate reported accuracy.<n>We present a sand-boil segmentation framework that closes both loopholes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Sand boils, points where water seeping beneath an earthen levee re-emerges at the surface, are early warnings of internal erosion, and deep segmentation networks are increasingly used to find them in inspection photographs. Annotated examples are scarce, and two common ways of working around that scarcity quietly inflate reported accuracy: tuning ensemble weights on the same images later used to score them, and training on synthetic images derived from the very photographs held out for testing. We present a sand-boil segmentation framework that closes both loopholes. Every synthetic image carries a pointer to its real parent, and a per-fold filter excludes any image whose parent is held out; five encoder-decoder backbones are trained under five-fold cross-validation, calibrated by one temperature scalar each, and combined by a per-pixel meta-learner fitted only on out-of-fold predictions. On the held-out test set the proposed Updated SandBoilNet reaches an intersection-over-union of 0.707 over three seeds, against 0.608 for the published original re-evaluated on the same split. Under the stacking protocol the calibrated stack reaches 0.681 against 0.694 for the strongest fold-averaged member, so it does not improve on the best single model; eight meta-learner families reproduce that outcome, which we trace to a mean pairwise error correlation of 0.894 among members. A synthetic pool filtered for label fidelity lifts the champion to 0.718 over three seeds against a 0.707 control. We also introduce a mask-conditioned synthesis route that makes the conditioning mask the label by construction, giving labelled training images at zero annotation cost.
Related papers
- Automated Perceptually-Motivated Assessment of Photographic Consistency in Paired Clinical Photographs: Pipeline Development and Internal Evaluation [0.0]
We developed a pipeline that analyzes pre/post pairs across thirteen calibrated sub-metrics.<n>The pipeline was calibrated on 134 matched within-patient published pre/post pairs and evaluated against identical-image pairs, synthetic-perturbation pairs, and 134 mismatched cross-publication pairs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T07:19:17Z) - Support Operation Factorization: Compositional Readout of Frozen Vision Encoders under Controlled Interventions [87.95757610455173]
We introduce an injectively aligned leave-one-cell-out protocol over support x operation grids and SO-OPF.<n>We separate two questions that aggregate scores conflate: whether the carrier composes held-out bindings when the grid is known, and whether that grid can be recovered from flat cell labels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-06T15:38:55Z) - Synthetic and Derived Training Images for Campus Waste Detection: A Multi-Seed Evaluation with YOLOv8n [0.0]
A bin-mounted camera could provide feedback as an item is discarded.<n>We evaluated whether synthetic and derived images improve a YOLOv8n detector for this view.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-21T19:30:57Z) - Lost in Visual Translation: A VLM-Assisted Perceptual-Semantic Coherence Framework for EEG-to-Image Reconstruction [0.10499611180329804]
EEG-to-image evaluation should distinguish visual fidelity from recoverable meaning.<n>SSIM, LPIPS, and CLIP penalize semantically recoverable outputs or reward plausible but incorrect ones.<n>We analyze 6,855 ground-truth/reconstruction pairs from ATM, ENIGMA, BrainVis, and DreamDiffusion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-14T05:40:23Z) - A Modelling and Evaluation Framework for EuroCrops-Driven Sentinel-2 Crop Segmentation [78.66324246922831]
This work presents a pipeline for generating semantic-segmentation-ready agricultural datasets from Sentinel-2 imagery and EuroCrops parcel-level annotations.<n>The dataset contains 67,337 patches from five European countries and uses a reduced taxonomy of ten crop classes plus background.<n>A four-level U-Net with Group Normalization was trained using 10 Sentinel-2 spectral bands and a composite loss combining class-weighted cross-entropy and Dice loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-30T11:20:29Z) - The frame-level leakage trap: rethinking evaluation protocols for intrinsic image decomposition, with source-separable uncertainty as a case study [0.0]
We quantify the leakage effect for the first time, across three architectures.<n>A frame-level split inflates test R_PSNR by 1.6 to 2.0 dB relative to a scene-level split.<n>We present a physics-informed decomposition I = R composed with S + N with a source-separable three-way heteroscedastic uncertainty head.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-07T14:37:16Z) - OPTED: Open Preprocessed Trachoma Eye Dataset Using Zero-Shot SAM 3 Segmentation [0.0]
Trachoma remains the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide, with Sub-Saharan Africa bearing over 85% of the global burden and Ethiopia alone accounting for more than half of all cases.<n>Yet publicly available preprocessed datasets for automated trachoma classification are scarce, and none originate from the most affected region.<n>We present OPTED, an open-source preprocessed trachoma eye dataset constructed using the Segment Anything Model 3 (SAM 3) for automated region-of-interest extraction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-06T21:07:08Z) - CLIPure: Purification in Latent Space via CLIP for Adversarially Robust Zero-Shot Classification [65.46685389276443]
We ground our work on CLIP, a vision-language pre-trained encoder model that can perform zero-shot classification by matching an image with text prompts.<n>We then formulate purification risk as the KL divergence between the joint distributions purification process.<n>We propose two variants for our CLIPure approach: CLI-Diff which models the likelihood of images' latent vectors, and CLIPure-Cos which models the likelihood with the cosine similarity between the embeddings of an image and a photo of a.''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T13:09:34Z) - Enhanced Sharp-GAN For Histopathology Image Synthesis [63.845552349914186]
Histopathology image synthesis aims to address the data shortage issue in training deep learning approaches for accurate cancer detection.
We propose a novel approach that enhances the quality of synthetic images by using nuclei topology and contour regularization.
The proposed approach outperforms Sharp-GAN in all four image quality metrics on two datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-24T17:54:01Z) - Multi-View Correlation Consistency for Semi-Supervised Semantic
Segmentation [59.34619548026885]
Semi-supervised semantic segmentation needs rich and robust supervision on unlabeled data.
We propose a view-coherent data augmentation strategy that guarantees pixel-pixel correspondence between different views.
In a series of semi-supervised settings on two datasets, we report competitive accuracy compared with the state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-17T17:59:11Z) - (Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free! [116.6052628829344]
We certify 71% accuracy on ImageNet under adversarial perturbations constrained to be within a 2-norm of 0.5.
We obtain these results using only pretrained diffusion models and image classifiers, without requiring any fine tuning or retraining of model parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-21T17:27:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.