Rethinking Likelihood distributions: Student's t Likelihood Boosts Bayesian Neural Network Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25376v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 07:32:02 GMT
• Title: Rethinking Likelihood distributions: Student's t Likelihood Boosts Bayesian Neural Network Performance
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether alternative assumptions for the likelihood distribution can outperform the commonly used Gaussian.<n>Student's t yields better predictive performance than a Gaussian likelihood distribution, independent of the data distribution and architecture.<n>In some cases, Student's t can also lead to shorter training times, while still being easy to implement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In Bayesian neural networks (BNNs), variational inference is a widely adopted framework for modeling uncertainty in a distributional way, with the evidence lower bound (ELBO) serving as the standard objective function. Several distributions contribute to the ELBO loss, such as the prior, approximated posterior, and likelihood distribution. Typically, these distributions are all approximated by a Gaussian distribution, since it is easy to compute, allows for reparameterized gradients, and provides a closed-form loss for training. However, several works have highlighted that this assumption may not generally hold, posing the risk of model misspecification. Alternative distributions have been proposed for the prior specifically, while the effect of distribution choice on the likelihood distribution remains unexplored. In this work, our aim is to close this gap by investigating whether alternative assumptions for the likelihood distribution can outperform the commonly used Gaussian. We compare several likelihood distribution assumptions, such as skewed or heavy-tailed, across regression tasks on both artificial and real-world datasets using standard multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). Our findings demonstrate that Student's t yields better predictive performance than a Gaussian likelihood distribution, independent of the data distribution and MLP architecture (depth and width). In some cases, Student's t can also lead to shorter training times, while still being easy to implement.

Related papers

• Sequential Function-Space Variational Inference via Gaussian Mixture Approximation [0.6827423171182154]
  Continual learning in neural networks aims to learn new tasks without forgetting old tasks.<n>We propose an SFSVI method based on a Gaussian mixture variational distribution.<n>We find that in terms of final average accuracy, likelihood-focused Gaussian mixture SFSVI outperforms other sequential variational inference methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T09:38:35Z)
• Theory on Score-Mismatched Diffusion Models and Zero-Shot Conditional Samplers [49.97755400231656]
  We present the first performance guarantee with explicit dimensional dependencies for general score-mismatched diffusion samplers.<n>We show that score mismatches result in an distributional bias between the target and sampling distributions, proportional to the accumulated mismatch between the target and training distributions.<n>This result can be directly applied to zero-shot conditional samplers for any conditional model, irrespective of measurement noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T16:42:12Z)
• Generative Conditional Distributions by Neural (Entropic) Optimal Transport [12.152228552335798]
  We introduce a novel neural entropic optimal transport method designed to learn generative models of conditional distributions. Our method relies on the minimax training of two neural networks. Our experiments on real-world datasets show the effectiveness of our algorithm compared to state-of-the-art conditional distribution learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T13:45:35Z)
• Rejection via Learning Density Ratios [50.91522897152437]
  Classification with rejection emerges as a learning paradigm which allows models to abstain from making predictions.<n>We propose a different distributional perspective, where we seek to find an idealized data distribution which maximizes a pretrained model's performance.<n>Our framework is tested empirically over clean and noisy datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T01:32:17Z)
• Dr. FERMI: A Stochastic Distributionally Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Framework [12.734559823650887]
  In the presence of distribution shifts, fair machine learning models may behave unfairly on test data. Existing algorithms require full access to data and cannot be used when small batches are used. This paper proposes the first distributionally robust fairness framework with convergence guarantees that do not require knowledge of the causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T23:25:28Z)
• Distribution Shift Inversion for Out-of-Distribution Prediction [57.22301285120695]
  We propose a portable Distribution Shift Inversion algorithm for Out-of-Distribution (OoD) prediction. We show that our method provides a general performance gain when plugged into a wide range of commonly used OoD algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T08:00:49Z)
• Normalizing flow sampling with Langevin dynamics in the latent space [12.91637880428221]
  Normalizing flows (NF) use a continuous generator to map a simple latent (e.g. Gaussian) distribution, towards an empirical target distribution associated with a training data set. Since standard NF implement differentiable maps, they may suffer from pathological behaviors when targeting complex distributions. This paper proposes a new Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to sample from the target distribution in the latent domain before transporting it back to the target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T09:31:35Z)
• Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributions [90.68414180153897]
  We connect domain adaptation and predictive uncertainty literature to predict model accuracy on challenging unseen distributions. We find that the difference of confidences (DoC) of a classifier's predictions successfully estimates the classifier's performance change over a variety of shifts. We specifically investigate the distinction between synthetic and natural distribution shifts and observe that despite its simplicity DoC consistently outperforms other quantifications of distributional difference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-07T15:50:18Z)
• Distributional Reinforcement Learning via Moment Matching [54.16108052278444]
  We formulate a method that learns a finite set of statistics from each return distribution via neural networks. Our method can be interpreted as implicitly matching all orders of moments between a return distribution and its Bellman target. Experiments on the suite of Atari games show that our method outperforms the standard distributional RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T05:18:17Z)
• Distributional Random Forests: Heterogeneity Adjustment and Multivariate Distributional Regression [0.8574682463936005]
  We propose a novel forest construction for multivariate responses based on their joint conditional distribution. The code is available as Python and R packages drf.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T09:05:00Z)
• GANs with Conditional Independence Graphs: On Subadditivity of Probability Divergences [70.30467057209405]
  Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are modern methods to learn the underlying distribution of a data set. GANs are designed in a model-free fashion where no additional information about the underlying distribution is available. We propose a principled design of a model-based GAN that uses a set of simple discriminators on the neighborhoods of the Bayes-net/MRF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T04:31:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.