Probing the Origins of Reasoning Performance: Representational Quality for Mathematical Problem-Solving in RL vs. SFT Fine-Tuned Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26119v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:42:42 GMT
• Title: Probing the Origins of Reasoning Performance: Representational Quality for Mathematical Problem-Solving in RL vs. SFT Fine-Tuned Models
• Abstract summary: Large reasoning models trained via reinforcement learning (RL) have been increasingly shown to outperform supervised fine-tuned (SFT) counterparts on mathematical reasoning tasks.<n>Our work presents two converging lines of evidence: First, linear probes trained on layer-wise hidden states reveal that RL models tend to achieve higher accuracy in predicting answer correctness compared to SFT models.<n>Second, mean ablation studies show that RL models develop a hierarchical architecture where deeper layers become progressively more critical, whereas SFT models distribute importance uniformly across layers.
• Score: 2.497936211748472
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large reasoning models trained via reinforcement learning (RL) have been increasingly shown to outperform their supervised fine-tuned (SFT) counterparts on mathematical reasoning tasks; Yet the mechanistic basis for this advantage remains unclear. We therefore ask, what internal representational differences enable RL models' superior performance? Our work presents two converging lines of evidence: First, linear probes trained on layer-wise hidden states reveal that RL models tend to achieve higher accuracy in predicting answer correctness compared to SFT models, indicating more linearly separable and structured representations. Second, mean ablation studies show that RL models develop a hierarchical architecture where deeper layers become progressively more critical, whereas SFT models distribute importance uniformly across layers. Together, these findings demonstrate that RL training fundamentally restructures how models represent and process reasoning problems. Finally, we analyze token-count variability under repeated sampling across problems to assess adaptive compute allocation. While we observe higher variability in some RL-tuned models than in their SFT counterparts, we see strong consistency in others, suggesting that token allocation may depend more on the overall training pipeline than on RL versus SFT alone. We believe this token-allocation variability reveals the spread of plausible on-policy reasoning, highlighting which models exhibit stable policies versus those that are under-determined, potentially non-identifiable solution behaviour.

Related papers

• Enough is as good as a feast: A Comprehensive Analysis of How Reinforcement Learning Mitigates Task Conflicts in LLMs [52.129885179495226]
  This study systematically explores the merging behavior of RL-trained large language models (LLMs) compared to those trained with traditional SFT.<n>We find that RL significantly reduces task conflicts and results in less performance degradation after merging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-24T07:08:57Z)
• Why Does Reinforcement Learning Generalize? A Feature-Level Mechanistic Study of Post-Training in Large Language Models [51.45122910254346]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training often improves the reasoning performance of large language models beyond the training domain.<n>Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) frequently leads to general forgetting capabilities.<n>We present a feature-level mechanistic analysis methodology to probe RL generalization using a controlled experimental setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-27T21:22:34Z)
• Distributional Clarity: The Hidden Driver of RL-Friendliness in Large Language Models [50.99097734404912]
  We show that RL-friendly models exhibit intra-class compactness and inter-class separation in their probability assignments to correct vs. incorrect responses.<n>Experiments across six mathematical benchmarks show consistent improvements across all model families, with gains up to 5.9 points on AIME24.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T13:34:44Z)
• How and Why LLMs Generalize: A Fine-Grained Analysis of LLM Reasoning from Cognitive Behaviors to Low-Level Patterns [51.02752099869218]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display strikingly different generalization behaviors.<n>We introduce a novel benchmark that decomposes reasoning into atomic core skills.<n>We show that RL-tuned models maintain more stable behavioral profiles and resist collapse in reasoning skills, whereas SFT models exhibit sharper drift and overfit to surface patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T08:16:20Z)
• Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions [17.407689582427437]
  Large language model (LLM) reasoning has shown that sophisticated behaviors such as planning and self-reflection can emerge through reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We introduce a novel training approach, textbfReLIFT (textbfReinforcement textbfL textbfInterleaved with Online textbfFine-textbfTuning)<n>In ReLIFT, the model is primarily trained using RL, but when it encounters challenging questions, high-quality solutions are collected for fine-tuning, and the training process alternate
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T08:11:20Z)
• Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [93.00629872970364]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the dominant paradigm for improving the performance of language models on complex reasoning tasks.<n>We introduce SPARKLE, a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the effects of RL across three key dimensions.<n>We study whether difficult problems -- those yielding no RL signals and mixed-quality reasoning traces -- can still be effectively used for training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z)
• Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretraining [74.83412846804977]
  Reinforcement learning (RL)-based fine-tuning has become a crucial step in post-training language models.<n>We present a systematic end-to-end study of RL fine-tuning for mathematical reasoning by training models entirely from scratch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T17:15:53Z)
• SFT or RL? An Early Investigation into Training R1-Like Reasoning Large Vision-Language Models [39.551767637896404]
  This work revisits the dominant supervised fine-tuning (SFT) then reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm for training Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>We show that SFT can significantly undermine subsequent RL by inducing pseudo reasoning paths'' imitated from expert models.<n>We introduce VLAA-Thinking, a new multimodal dataset designed to support reasoning in LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T16:54:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.