Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26473v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 04:56:14 GMT
• Title: Learning Dynamic User Personas from Implicit Interaction Streams via Iterative Refinement
• Abstract summary: We propose IRIS, a framework that learns dynamic user personas directly from implicit interaction streams.<n>IRIS produces stable personas and distinguishes individual users while revealing limitations of memory-only approaches.<n>We validate IRIS on anonymized real-world Reddit r/AmItheAsshole (AITA) data, with personas built solely from each author's historical interactions.
• Score: 4.027292457517535
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Personalizing large language models (LLMs) to individual users is essential for improving user experience, yet existing approaches typically rely on explicit preference supervision such as pairwise comparisons or demographic attributes, limiting their applicability in natural interaction settings. We propose IRIS, a framework that learns dynamic user personas directly from implicit interaction streams by extracting behavioral signals from everyday conversations and iteratively refining persona representations through a prediction-driven closed loop without requiring explicit feedback. We introduce an evaluation protocol based on behavior prediction, persona stability, and decision prediction. A proof-of-concept study on a synthetic interaction stream derived from public-domain autobiographical text shows that IRIS produces stable personas and distinguishes individual users while revealing limitations of memory-only approaches on recall-oriented metrics. We then validate IRIS on anonymized real-world Reddit r/AmItheAsshole (AITA) data, with personas built solely from each author's historical interactions. Across 100 authors, IRIS achieves the highest decision prediction accuracy among all evaluated methods (61.0%), outperforming static personas, memory-only retrieval, and no-personalization baselines. These results suggest that implicit behavioral modeling provides a scalable alternative to explicit preference learning for personalized LLMs and offers a practical foundation for adaptive conversational systems and embodied agents that require continuously evolving models of their users.

Related papers

• Hypotheses-Guided Self Distillation for Continual Personalization [16.17908994206264]
  We introduce HypReflect, a reliable, scalable framework for continual personalization.<n>HypReflect infers explicit, uncertainty-aware preference hypotheses from diverse user signals.<n>Results suggest a step towards reliable and scalable continual personalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T18:52:21Z)
• BehaviorBench: Modeling Real-World User Decisions from Behavioral Traces [53.55407626944686]
  textscBehaviorBench is a benchmark for evaluating personalized decision modeling from real-world behavioral traces.<n>textscBehaviorBench reconstructs wallet-level decision histories from observed public prediction-market and on-chain records.<n>Across 2,000 evaluation wallets, the benchmark contains 141,445 Belief instances and 1,485,972 Trade instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T19:04:36Z)
• Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation [59.539429430690156]
  Existing evaluation methods fail to capture user-specific preferences embedded in long-term interaction histories.<n>We propose Personalized Evaluation as Learning, a paradigm that formulates personalized evaluation as a learning problem rather than a static judgment.<n>Experiments show that PARL consistently induces high-fidelity rubrics that reliably identify user-aligned responses and generalize across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T17:00:55Z)
• Hierarchical Multi-Persona Induction from User Behavioral Logs: Learning Evidence-Grounded and Truthful Personas [7.672918013974333]
  We propose a hierarchical framework that aggregates user actions into intent memories and induces multiple evidence-grounded personas.<n>Experiments on a large-scale service log and two public datasets show that our method induces more coherent, evidence-grounded, and trustworthy personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T21:13:16Z)
• Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models [67.31884245564086]
  We introduce a high-fidelity synthetic data generation framework called PersonaGym.<n>Unlike prior work that treats personalization as static persona-preference pairs, PersonaGym models a dynamic preference process.<n>We release PersonaAtlas, a large-scale, high-quality, and diverse synthetic dataset of high-fidelity multi-turn personalized interaction trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T20:41:22Z)
• Reasoning LLMs for User-Aware Multimodal Conversational Agents [3.533721662684487]
  Personalization in social robotics is critical for fostering effective human-robot interactions.<n>This paper proposes a novel framework called USER-LLM R1 for a user-aware conversational agent.<n>Our approach integrates chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning models to iteratively infer user preferences and vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T13:00:17Z)
• Mind the Gap! Static and Interactive Evaluations of Large Audio Models [55.87220295533817]
  Large Audio Models (LAMs) are designed to power voice-native experiences.<n>This study introduces an interactive approach to evaluate LAMs and collect 7,500 LAM interactions from 484 participants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T20:29:02Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align''<n>We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures.<n>For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)
• WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And Feedback [36.06000681394939]
  We introduce WildFeedback, a novel framework that leverages in-situ user feedback during conversations with large language models (LLMs) to create preference datasets automatically.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned on WildFeedback dataset exhibit significantly improved alignment with user preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T05:53:46Z)
• Lusifer: LLM-based User SImulated Feedback Environment for online Recommender systems [0.0]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) recommender systems often rely on static datasets that fail to capture the fluid, ever changing nature of user preferences in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce Lusifer, an LLM-based simulation environment designed to generate dynamic, realistic user feedback for RL-based recommender training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T05:43:15Z)
• Bring Your Own Data! Self-Supervised Evaluation for Large Language Models [52.15056231665816]
  We propose a framework for self-supervised evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) We demonstrate self-supervised evaluation strategies for measuring closed-book knowledge, toxicity, and long-range context dependence. We find strong correlations between self-supervised and human-supervised evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-23T17:59:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.