From Representations to Behaviors: Exploring the Person-Situation-Behavior Triad in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26853v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 12:36:47 GMT
• Title: From Representations to Behaviors: Exploring the Person-Situation-Behavior Triad in LLMs
• Abstract summary: Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under personality conditioning.<n>We introduce a framework for discovering, controlling, and validating trait-like representations in LLMs.<n>Our findings provide evidence that LLMs contain controllable trait-like representations linking internal states, situational expression, and behavioral outcomes.
• Score: 8.188989044347595
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Human personality theories characterize traits not as isolated attributes captured by a single score, but as stable individual tendencies expressed through the interplay among persons, situations, and behaviors. Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under personality conditioning, characterizing observable trait-related expressions while lacking mechanistic evidence for the existence of internal personality-related representations, their cross-situational expression, and how these representations shape specific behaviors. Building on Funder's personality triad framework, we adapt its three components for LLM analysis: Person as personality-related internal representations, Situation as contexts that afford trait-relevant responses, and Behavior as response patterns on broader social tasks. We introduce a framework for discovering, controlling, and validating trait-like representations in LLMs. First, using contrastive behavior pairs grounded in shared situations, we identify sparse internal features associated with opposing poles of personality traits through SAE decomposition. We validate their trait relevance through effects on behavior to situation, token-level activation patterns, and robustness to paraphrasing. Second, feature-level interventions induce bidirectional trait-related shifts across a separate, diverse set of situations while preserving response validity, demonstrating consistent expression across contexts. Third, applying the same interventions to social intelligence tasks reveals behavioral changes with benefit-tradeoff patterns consistent with findings from human personality research, providing behavioral-level validation beyond personality scores. Our findings provide evidence that LLMs contain controllable trait-like representations linking internal states, situational expression, and behavioral outcomes.

Related papers

• Reading Cognition as Decisions Unfold in Words: A Factorized Inverse Decision Model [67.84198127797005]
  Inverse decision modeling infers latent properties of decision processes from observed behavior.<n>We propose a factorized inverse decision model (FIDM) that decomposes each individual's task-execution likelihood into an action factor and an effort factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-10T07:46:13Z)
• Rethinking Psychometric Evaluation of LLMs: When and Why Self-Reports Predict Behavior [58.538864650160406]
  We run experiments across four behavioral tasks and 11 frontier LLMs.<n>We find that SR-behavior coherence exists but is selective.<n>These findings suggest that coarse personality frameworks may not be the best tools for testing deployment behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T22:28:53Z)
• Enhancing Personality Recognition by Comparing the Predictive Power of Traits, Facets, and Nuances [37.83859643892549]
  Personality recognition models aim to infer personality traits from different sources of behavioral data.<n>We trained a transformer-based model including cross-modal (audiovisual) and cross-subject (dyad-aware) attention mechanisms.<n>Results show that nuance-level models consistently outperform facet and trait-level models, reducing mean squared error by up to 74% across interaction scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T13:35:04Z)
• Personality Expression Across Contexts: Linguistic and Behavioral Variation in LLM Agents [6.123697959900301]
  This study examines how identical personality prompts lead to distinct linguistic, behavioral, and emotional outcomes across four conversational settings.<n>Findings suggest that the same traits are expressed differently depending on social and affective demands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T07:14:00Z)
• Vibe Check: Understanding the Effects of LLM-Based Conversational Agents' Personality and Alignment on User Perceptions in Goal-Oriented Tasks [2.1117030125341385]
  Large language models (LLMs) enable conversational agents (CAs) to express distinctive personalities.<n>This study investigates how personality expression levels and user-agent personality alignment influence perceptions in goal-oriented tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T21:43:49Z)
• The Personality Illusion: Revealing Dissociation Between Self-Reports & Behavior in LLMs [60.15472325639723]
  Personality traits have long been studied as predictors of human behavior.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) suggest similar patterns may emerge in artificial systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T21:27:10Z)
• IROTE: Human-like Traits Elicitation of Large Language Model via In-Context Self-Reflective Optimization [66.6349183886101]
  We propose IROTE, a novel in-context method for stable and transferable trait elicitation.<n>We show that one single IROTE-generated self-reflection can induce LLMs' stable impersonation of the target trait across diverse downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T08:04:28Z)
• A Comparative Study of Large Language Models and Human Personality Traits [6.354326674890978]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated human-like capabilities in language comprehension and generation.<n>This study investigates whether LLMs exhibit personality-like traits and how these traits compare with human personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T15:10:15Z)
• Revealing Personality Traits: A New Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Personality Recognition on Dialogues [63.936654900356004]
  Personality recognition aims to identify the personality traits implied in user data such as dialogues and social media posts. We propose a novel task named Explainable Personality Recognition, aiming to reveal the reasoning process as supporting evidence of the personality trait.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T14:41:43Z)
• Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics [59.821829073478376]
  This paper offers a comprehensive benchmark for quantifying psychological constructs of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our work identifies five key psychological constructs -- personality, values, emotional intelligence, theory of mind, and self-efficacy -- assessed through a suite of 13 datasets.<n>We uncover significant discrepancies between LLMs' self-reported traits and their response patterns in real-world scenarios, revealing complexities in their behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• Revisiting the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models [62.57981196992073]
  This study aims to determine the reliability of applying personality assessments to Large Language Models. Analysis of 2,500 settings per model, including GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Gemini-Pro, and LLaMA-3.1, reveals that various LLMs show consistency in responses to the Big Five Inventory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T15:03:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.