Defending Against Backdoor Attacks via Alignment Checking in Model-Contrastive Federated Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.26933v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:59:37 GMT
• Title: Defending Against Backdoor Attacks via Alignment Checking in Model-Contrastive Federated Learning
• Abstract summary: Federated Learning (FL) is vulnerable to backdoor attacks because of its distributed nature in edge computing scenarios.<n>We propose FedDAB, a two-phase method that combines local contrastive regularization with alignment checking.<n>In the first phase, FedDAB introduces a novel model-contrastive term into the local objective to enhance direction and magnitude consistency among benign updates.<n>In the second phase, FedDAB employs an alignment checking strategy to evaluate each local update in terms of overall-direction alignment and parameter-level alignment with historical information.
• Score: 14.736525171809303
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is vulnerable to backdoor attacks because of its distributed nature in edge computing scenarios. Existing defense methods show limited efficacy as they overlook the deviations among benign local updates caused by statistical heterogeneity and the stealthiness of backdoor attacks. To tackle these issues, we propose FedDAB, a two-phase method that combines local contrastive regularization with alignment checking, to defend against backdoor attacks. In the first phase, FedDAB introduces a novel model-contrastive term into the local objective to enhance direction and magnitude consistency among benign updates. In the second phase, FedDAB employs an alignment checking strategy to evaluate each local update in terms of overall-direction alignment and parameter-level alignment with historical information, excluding updates that exhibit abnormal alignment patterns from global aggregation. We theoretically prove FedDAB's robustness with a convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$. Extensive experiments show that FedDAB outperforms existing defense methods against backdoor attacks.

Related papers

• Detecting and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in OTA-FL Systems: A Two-Stage Robust Aggregation Scheme [27.75838619796163]
  Over-the-air federated learning (OTA-FL) improves communication efficiency by exploiting the superposition property of wireless channels.<n>This creates a critical security vulnerability: the parameter server cannot access individual local updates.<n>We propose a two-stage robust aggregation framework for defending against backdoor attacks in OTA-FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-19T01:57:31Z)
• Beyond Passive Aggregation: Active Auditing and Topology-Aware Defense in Decentralized Federated Learning [1.8262547855491456]
  Decentralized Learning (DFL) remains highly vulnerable to backdoor attacks designed to bypass traditional defense metrics.<n>To address this limitation, we shift the defensive paradigm toward a novel active, interventional auditing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T06:46:55Z)
• MARS: A Malignity-Aware Backdoor Defense in Federated Learning [51.77354308287098]
  Recently proposed state-of-the-art (SOTA) attack, 3DFed, uses an indicator mechanism to determine whether backdoor models have been accepted by the defender.<n>We propose a Malignity-Aware backdooR defenSe (MARS) that leverages backdoor energy to indicate the malicious extent of each neuron.<n>Experiments demonstrate that MARS can defend against SOTA backdoor attacks and significantly outperforms existing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-21T14:50:02Z)
• DOPA: Stealthy and Generalizable Backdoor Attacks from a Single Client under Challenging Federated Constraints [2.139012072214621]
  Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly adopted for privacy-preserving collaborative training, but its decentralized nature makes it susceptible to backdoor attacks.<n>Existing attack methods, however, often rely on idealized assumptions and fail to remain effective under real-world constraints.<n>We propose DOPA, a novel framework that simulates heterogeneous local training dynamics and seeks consensus across divergent optimization trajectories to craft universally effective and stealthy backdoor triggers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T08:39:12Z)
• Coward: Toward Practical Proactive Federated Backdoor Defense via Collision-based Watermark [90.94234374893287]
  We introduce a new proactive defense, dubbed Coward, inspired by our discovery of multi-backdoor collision effects.<n>In general, we detect attackers by evaluating whether the server-injected, conflicting global watermark is erased during local training rather than retained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T06:51:33Z)
• Detecting Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning via Direction Alignment Inspection [7.200910949076064]
  Federated Learning (FL) systems are vulnerable to malicious model updates.<n>We introduce AlignIns, a novel defense method designed to safeguard FL systems against backdoor attacks.<n>We show that AlignIns achieves higher robustness compared to the state-of-the-art defense methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T02:24:53Z)
• T2IShield: Defending Against Backdoors on Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [70.03122709795122]
  We propose a comprehensive defense method named T2IShield to detect, localize, and mitigate backdoor attacks. We find the "Assimilation Phenomenon" on the cross-attention maps caused by the backdoor trigger. For backdoor sample detection, T2IShield achieves a detection F1 score of 88.9$%$ with low computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T01:53:21Z)
• Revisiting Backdoor Attacks against Large Vision-Language Models from Domain Shift [104.76588209308666]
  This paper explores backdoor attacks in LVLM instruction tuning across mismatched training and testing domains.<n>We introduce a new evaluation dimension, backdoor domain generalization, to assess attack robustness.<n>We propose a multimodal attribution backdoor attack (MABA) that injects domain-agnostic triggers into critical areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T02:31:03Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks [0.0]
  Federated learning is a distributed framework designed to address privacy concerns.<n>It introduces new attack surfaces, which are especially prone when data is non-Independently and Identically Distributed.<n>We present FedCC, a simple yet effective novel defense algorithm against model poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T01:52:32Z)
• A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
  Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems. This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space. It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.