SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28457v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:20:58 GMT
• Title: SVR: Self-Verifying Refinement via Joint Verdict-Confidence Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Test-Time Compute
• Abstract summary: Self-Verifying Refinement is an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework.<n>It learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy.<n>It achieves a macro-average accuracy of 0.563 with only 2.99 inference turns on average.
• Score: 62.3458279176813
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Scaling test-time computation can improve language-model reasoning, but uniform budgets waste computation on easy inputs, while verifier-guided refinement relies on external feedback. We introduce Self-Verifying Refinement (SVR), an oracle-free multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that learns to use self-verification as a compute-control policy. At each turn, the model produces a solution together with a discrete correctness verdict and a confidence score; it retains the current answer only when the verdict is Correct and confidence exceeds a threshold, and otherwise continues refinement using its own self-verification. Ground-truth correctness is used only to construct training rewards and is never exposed to the policy through refinement prompts or required at inference. SVR is trained with GRPO on fixed-horizon trajectories using rewards that promote solution correctness, calibration-aware self-verification, and stop-ready correct states; adaptive stopping is activated only at inference. On seven mathematical reasoning benchmarks with Qwen3.5-2B, SVR achieves a macro-average accuracy of 0.563 with only 2.99 inference turns on average. In the evaluated complete-system comparison, it exceeds standard GRPO, strong multi-turn baselines, and a fixed-budget oracle-guided score-feedback reference while requiring substantially fewer turns than fixed ten-turn inference. These results demonstrate that learned self-verification can serve as an effective internal control signal for answer retention and adaptive test-time compute allocation.

Related papers

• FlowBalance: Verifier-Grounded Self-Improvement from On-Policy Reasoning Experience [18.64380706071327]
  FlowBalance is a verifier-grounded self-improvement method that learns a normalized distribution over complete responses.<n>For each on-policy trajectory, a frozen training-time view of the same policy uses privileged context to produce token-level log-probability gains.<n>Our analysis establishes within-group contrast preservation, a minimum-change reverse-KL characterization, monotonic verifier control of target reward, and an exact correction against false-positive self-guidance on rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-09-03T00:47:11Z)
• SVR-R1: Bootstrapping Multi-modal Reasoning with Self-verification in Reinforcement Learning [47.4480595602701]
  We introduce Self-Verified Reasoner (SVR-R1), a multi-turn RL framework that turns a model's own verification into a learning signal for multimodal reasoning.<n>For each query, the model proposes an answer using the same weights, and issues a binary self-verdict (Yes/No)<n>A 'No' triggers a second-chance rethink; a 'Yes,' or a turn cap, finalizes the output for computing the outcome-based reward.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T00:21:30Z)
• Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards [73.44333771806282]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization (CIPO), a simple and effective extension to RLVR that converts on-policy failed trajectories into correction-oriented supervision.<n>CIPO improves learning effectiveness while explicitly enhancing the model's ability to correct its own errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-14T08:22:21Z)
• Confidence Before Answering: A Paradigm Shift for Efficient LLM Uncertainty Estimation [47.91529693614168]
  Existing methods are predominantly answer-first, producing confidence only after generating an answer.<n>We study a confidence-first paradigm, where the model outputs its confidence before answering, interpreting this score as the model's probability of answering the question correctly.<n>We propose CoCA, a reinforcement learning framework that jointly optimize confidence calibration and answer accuracy via segmented credit assignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T04:03:13Z)
• VI-CuRL: Stabilizing Verifier-Independent RL Reasoning via Confidence-Guided Variance Reduction [55.04308051033549]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a dominant paradigm for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning.<n>We introduceVerifier-Independent Curriculum Reinforcement Learning (VI-CuRL), a framework that leverages the model's intrinsic confidence to construct a curriculum independent from external verifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T03:40:52Z)
• CoRefine: Confidence-Guided Self-Refinement for Adaptive Test-Time Compute [10.548368675645403]
  CoRefine is a confidence-guided self-refinement method that achieves competitive accuracy using a fraction of the tokens.<n>The controller consumes full-trace confidence to decide whether to halt, re-examine, or try a different approach.<n>We extend this to CoRefine-Tree, a hybrid sequential-parallel variant that adaptively balances exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T17:44:41Z)
• Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency for Efficient Sampling in LLM Reasoning [20.371912257758634]
  Self-Consistency improves reasoning reliability through multi-sample aggregation, but incurs substantial inference cost.<n>We propose Reliability-Aware Adaptive Self-Consistency (ReASC), which addresses this limitation by reframing adaptive sampling from response counting to evidence sufficiency.<n>ReASC consistently achieves the best accuracy-cost trade-off compared to existing baselines, yielding improved inference efficiency across model scales from 3B to 27B parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T12:27:53Z)
• CARE What Fails: Contrastive Anchored-REflection for Verifiable Multimodal [84.71254539482369]
  Group-relative reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) often wastes the most informative data it already has the failures.<n>We present CARE, a failure-centric post-training framework for multimodal reasoning that turns errors into supervision.<n> CARE improves accuracy and training smoothness while explicitly increasing the share of learning signal that comes from failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T16:34:21Z)
• LaSeR: Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding [54.72617309922891]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a core paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Previous practice requires the LLM to sequentially generate solutions and self-verifications using two separate prompt templates, which significantly reduces efficiency.<n>We propose LaSeR (Reinforcement Learning with Last-Token Self-Rewarding), an algorithm that simply augments the original RLVR loss with a MSE loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T17:55:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.