Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28997v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 03:52:20 GMT
• Title: Think2Go: Generative Next POI Recommendation with LLM Reasoning
• Abstract summary: Next Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation task focuses on mining user behavioral preference patterns from historical check-ins to provide personalized suggestions for the next destination.<n>Existing methods rely on shallow contextual information and handcrafted feature interactions to predict the next POI.<n>We propose Think2Go, a novel generative next POI recommendation framework, which enhances the model's comprehension of SID representations and explores diverse spatial-temporal patterns via test-time computational scaling.
• Score: 57.37706163990998
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Next Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation task focuses on mining user behavioral preference patterns from historical check-ins to provide personalized suggestions for the next destination. Existing methods primarily rely on shallow contextual information and handcrafted feature interactions to predict the next POI. However, the inherent sparsity and complexity of user mobility patterns limit the computational capacity of non-reasoning models to capture deep intent, while large language models (LLMs) perform suboptimally because they lack a deep understanding of semantic IDs (SIDs) when SIDs are trained separately. To address these limitations, we propose Think2Go, a novel generative next POI recommendation framework, which enhances the model's comprehension of SID representations and explores diverse spatial-temporal patterns via test-time computational scaling. We unify supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL)-based reasoning within a single architecture, enabling joint optimization of memorization and adaptive reasoning to better retain user behavior patterns while exploring diverse user preferences. To further calibrate policy optimization in adaptive reasoning, we propose two advantage weighting mechanisms that integrate (1) prompt epistemic uncertainty, estimated via kernel density methods to assess the spatial-temporal periodic pattern alignment between queries and user history, promoting increased exploration under high epistemic uncertainty; and (2) reward-informed advantage scaling, captured by normalizing rewards against their maxima to adapt update magnitudes, thereby improving training stability and mitigating overfitting to noisy signals. This joint calibration forms an implicit curriculum learning strategy, delivering fine-grained, instance-aware policy updates that prevent entropy collapse and support robust exploration.

Related papers

• Multi-Objective Reward and Preference Optimization: Theory and Algorithms [3.316593788543852]
  This thesis develops theoretical frameworks and algorithms that advance constrained reinforcement learning (RL) across control, preference learning, and alignment of large language models.<n>ACPO, e-COP, warmPref-PS, PSPL, and MOPO advance RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms.<n> Collectively, the thesis unifies RL across average-cost, episodic, and preference-driven paradigms, delivering theoretical advances and practical tools for safe and aligned decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T12:51:21Z)
• Multimodal Large Language Models with Adaptive Preference Optimization for Sequential Recommendation [60.33386541343322]
  We propose a Multimodal Large Language Models framework that integrates Hardness-aware and Noise-regularized preference optimization for Recommendation (HaNoRec)<n>Specifically, HaNoRec dynamically adjusts optimization weights based on both the estimated hardness of each training sample and the policy model's real-time responsiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T04:10:46Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences [14.686788596611246]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become central to aligning large language models with human values.<n>Recent alternatives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify this pipeline by directly optimizing on preferences.<n>We propose a theoretical and algorithmic framework for fairness and personalization for diverse users in generative model alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T15:00:40Z)
• STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
  We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z)
• LARES: Latent Reasoning for Sequential Recommendation [96.26996622771593]
  We present LARES, a novel and scalable LAtent REasoning framework for Sequential recommendation.<n>Our proposed approach employs a recurrent architecture that allows flexible expansion of reasoning depth without increasing parameter complexity.<n>Our framework exhibits seamless compatibility with existing advanced models, further improving their recommendation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T16:22:54Z)
• Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
  We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.<n>We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.<n>We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences [14.686788596611246]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become central to aligning large language models with human values.<n>Recent alternatives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify this pipeline by directly optimizing on preferences.<n>We propose a theoretical and algorithmic framework for fairness and personalization for diverse users in generative model alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T21:25:20Z)
• Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement [67.1393112206885]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise as intelligent agents in interactive decision-making tasks. We introduce Entropy-Regularized Token-level Policy Optimization (ETPO), an entropy-augmented RL method tailored for optimizing LLMs at the token level. We assess the effectiveness of ETPO within a simulated environment that models data science code generation as a series of multi-step interactive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T07:45:26Z)
• AURO: Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive User Retention Optimization in Recommender Systems [25.18963930580529]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has garnered increasing attention for its ability to optimize user retention in recommender systems.<n>This paper introduces a novel approach called textbfAdaptive textbfUser textbfRetention textbfOptimization (AURO) to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T02:45:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.