Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15065v2
• Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 21:49:06 GMT
• Title: Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences
• Authors: Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become central to aligning large language models with human values.<n>Recent alternatives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify this pipeline by directly optimizing on preferences.<n>We propose a theoretical and algorithmic framework for fairness and personalization for diverse users in generative model alignment.
• Score: 14.686788596611246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become central to aligning large language models with human values, typically by first learning a reward model from preference data which is then used to update the model with reinforcement learning. Recent alternatives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify this pipeline by directly optimizing on preferences. However, both approaches often assume uniform annotator preferences and rely on binary comparisons, overlooking two key limitations: the diversity of human evaluators and the limitations of pairwise feedback. In this work, we address both these issues. First, we connect preference learning in RLHF with the econometrics literature and show that binary comparisons are insufficient for identifying latent user preferences from finite user data and infinite users, while (even incomplete) rankings over three or more responses ensure identifiability. Second, we introduce methods to incorporate heterogeneous preferences into alignment algorithms. We develop an Expectation-Maximization adaptation of DPO that discovers latent annotator types and trains a mixture of LLMs accordingly. Then we propose an aggregation algorithm using a min-max regret fairness criterion to produce a single generative policy with equitable performance guarantees. Together, these contributions establish a theoretical and algorithmic framework for fairness and personalization for diverse users in generative model alignment.

Related papers

• Direct Preference Optimization with Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity: The Necessity of Ternary Preferences [14.686788596611246]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become central to aligning large language models with human values.<n>Recent alternatives such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) simplify this pipeline by directly optimizing on preferences.<n>We propose a theoretical and algorithmic framework for fairness and personalization for diverse users in generative model alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-17T15:00:40Z)
• Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization for Diffusion Model Alignment [58.651951388346525]
  Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization (DMPO) is a principled method for aligning diffusion models by minimizing reverse KL divergence.<n>Our results show that diffusion models fine-tuned with DMPO can consistently outperform or match existing techniques.<n>DMPO unlocks a robust and elegant pathway for preference alignment, bridging principled theory with practical performance in diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:57:30Z)
• Smoothed Preference Optimization via ReNoise Inversion for Aligning Diffusion Models with Varied Human Preferences [13.588231827053923]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) aligns text-to-image (T2I) generation models with human preferences using pairwise preference data.<n>We propose SmPO-Diffusion, a novel method for modeling preference distributions to improve the DPO objective.<n>Our approach effectively mitigates issues of excessive optimization and objective misalignment present in existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:47:22Z)
• Multi-Level Aware Preference Learning: Enhancing RLHF for Complex Multi-Instruction Tasks [81.44256822500257]
  RLHF has emerged as a predominant approach for aligning artificial intelligence systems with human preferences.<n> RLHF exhibits insufficient compliance capabilities when confronted with complex multi-instruction tasks.<n>We propose a novel Multi-level Aware Preference Learning (MAPL) framework, capable of enhancing multi-instruction capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T08:33:11Z)
• Self-NPO: Negative Preference Optimization of Diffusion Models by Simply Learning from Itself without Explicit Preference Annotations [60.143658714894336]
  Diffusion models have demonstrated remarkable success in various visual generation tasks, including image, video, and 3D content generation.<n> Preference optimization (PO) is a prominent and growing area of research that aims to align these models with human preferences.<n>We introduce Self-NPO, a Negative Preference Optimization approach that learns exclusively from the model itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T01:03:46Z)
• Diffusion-NPO: Negative Preference Optimization for Better Preference Aligned Generation of Diffusion Models [32.586647934400105]
  We argue that existing preference alignment methods neglect the critical role of handling unconditional/negative-conditional outputs.<n>We propose a straightforward but versatile effective approach that involves training a model specifically attuned to negative preferences.<n>Our approach integrates seamlessly with models such as SD1.5, SDXL, video diffusion models and models that have undergone preference optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T13:38:23Z)
• InPO: Inversion Preference Optimization with Reparametrized DDIM for Efficient Diffusion Model Alignment [12.823734370183482]
  We introduce DDIM-InPO, an efficient method for direct preference alignment of diffusion models. Our approach conceptualizes diffusion model as a single-step generative model, allowing us to fine-tune the outputs of specific latent variables selectively. Experimental results indicate that our DDIM-InPO achieves state-of-the-art performance with just 400 steps of fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T08:58:49Z)
• Calibrated Multi-Preference Optimization for Aligning Diffusion Models [92.90660301195396]
  Calibrated Preference Optimization (CaPO) is a novel method to align text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models. CaPO incorporates the general preference from multiple reward models without human annotated data. Experimental results show that CaPO consistently outperforms prior methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T18:59:23Z)
• Personalized Preference Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models [75.22218338096316]
  We introduce PPD, a multi-reward optimization objective that aligns diffusion models with personalized preferences. With PPD, a diffusion model learns the individual preferences of a population of users in a few-shot way. Our approach achieves an average win rate of 76% over Stable Cascade, generating images that more accurately reflect specific user preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-11T22:38:41Z)
• ComPO: Community Preferences for Language Model Personalization [122.54846260663922]
  ComPO is a method to personalize preference optimization in language models. We collect and release ComPRed, a question answering dataset with community-level preferences from Reddit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T14:02:40Z)
• Beyond Bradley-Terry Models: A General Preference Model for Language Model Alignment [51.14207112118503]
  We introduce preference embedding, an approach that embeds responses into a latent space to capture preferences efficiently. We also propose preference score-based General Preference Optimization (GPO), which generalizes reward-based reinforcement learning from human feedback. Our method may enhance the alignment of foundation models with nuanced human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:22:55Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• PAL: Pluralistic Alignment Framework for Learning from Heterogeneous Preferences [6.398937923320069]
  We propose PAL, a framework to model human preference complementary to existing pretraining strategies. We show that PAL achieves competitive reward model accuracy compared to strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T17:54:54Z)
• Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback [103.36048042664768]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values. We propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T20:33:22Z)
• Preference Alignment with Flow Matching [23.042382086241364]
  Preference Flow Matching (PFM) is a new framework for preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) It streamlines the integration of preferences into an arbitrary class of pre-trained models. We provide theoretical insights that support our method's alignment with standard PbRL objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T08:16:22Z)
• Preference Learning Algorithms Do Not Learn Preference Rankings [62.335733662381884]
  We study the conventional wisdom that preference learning trains models to assign higher likelihoods to more preferred outputs than less preferred outputs. We find that most state-of-the-art preference-tuned models achieve a ranking accuracy of less than 60% on common preference datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T21:29:44Z)
• Robust Preference Optimization through Reward Model Distillation [68.65844394615702]
  Language model (LM) post-training involves maximizing a reward function that is derived from preference annotations. DPO is a popular offline alignment method that trains a policy directly on preference data without the need to train a reward model or apply reinforcement learning. We analyze this phenomenon and propose distillation to get a better proxy for the true preference distribution over generation pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:39:48Z)
• Multi-Reference Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [56.84730239046117]
  We introduce a novel closed-form formulation for direct preference optimization using multiple reference models. The resulting algorithm, Multi-Reference Preference Optimization (MRPO), leverages broader prior knowledge from diverse reference models. Our experiments demonstrate that LLMs finetuned with MRPO generalize better in various preference data, regardless of data scarcity or abundance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T00:29:04Z)
• RLHF from Heterogeneous Feedback via Personalization and Preference Aggregation [24.374185140811115]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has been an effective technique for aligning AI systems with human values. In this paper, we focus on addressing the issues due to the inherent heterogeneity in human preferences, as well as their potential strategic behavior in providing feedback. We propose two frameworks to address heterogeneous human feedback in principled ways: personalization-based one and aggregation-based one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T23:57:23Z)
• Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization [105.3612692153615]
  We propose a new axis based on eliciting preferences jointly over instruction-response pairs.<n>Joint preferences over instruction and response pairs can significantly enhance the alignment of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T02:05:40Z)
• Reward Model Learning vs. Direct Policy Optimization: A Comparative Analysis of Learning from Human Preferences [24.645259298082436]
  We take a step towards a deeper understanding of learning from human preferences by systematically comparing the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) with the recently proposed paradigm of direct preference optimization (DPO) We derive minimax statistical bounds on the suboptimality gap induced by both RLHF and DPO. We extend our analysis to the approximate optimization setting and derive exponentially decaying convergence rates for both RLHF and DPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T09:13:14Z)
• MaxMin-RLHF: Alignment with Diverse Human Preferences [101.57443597426374]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) aligns language models to human preferences by employing a singular reward model derived from preference data.<n>We learn a mixture of preference distributions via an expectation-maximization algorithm to better represent diverse human preferences.<n>Our algorithm achieves an average improvement of more than 16% in win-rates over conventional RLHF algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T03:56:27Z)
• Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models [12.093302163058436]
  We develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T23:09:00Z)
• Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modeling [134.97964938009588]
  We introduce a series of novel methods to mitigate the influence of incorrect and ambiguous preferences in the dataset. We also introduce contrastive learning to enhance the ability of reward models to distinguish between chosen and rejected responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T17:56:59Z)
• Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimization [103.2238655827797]
  Diffusion-DPO is a method to align diffusion models to human preferences by directly optimizing on human comparison data. We fine-tune the base model of the state-of-the-art Stable Diffusion XL (SDXL)-1.0 model with Diffusion-DPO. We also develop a variant that uses AI feedback and has comparable performance to training on human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T15:24:05Z)
• Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL [71.77024922527642]
  We introduce Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:37:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.