Bridging the Question-Answer Gap in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Hypothetical Prompt Embeddings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29402v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:22:11 GMT
• Title: Bridging the Question-Answer Gap in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Hypothetical Prompt Embeddings
• Abstract summary: Hypothetical Prompt Embeddings (HyPE) is a framework that shifts the generation of hypothetical content from query time to the indexing phase.<n>We show that HyPE can improve retrieval context precision by up to 42 percentage points and claim recall by up to 45 percentage points, compared to standard approaches.
• Score: 42.348431760663544
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems synergize retrieval mechanisms with generative language models to enhance the accuracy and relevance of responses. However, bridging the style gap between user queries and relevant information in document text remains a persistent challenge in retrieval-augmented systems, often addressed by runtime solutions (e.g., Hypothetical Document Embeddings (HyDE)) that attempt to improve alignment but introduce extra computational overhead at query time. To address these challenges, we propose Hypothetical Prompt Embeddings (HyPE), a framework that shifts the generation of hypothetical content from query time to the indexing phase. By precomputing multiple hypothetical prompts for each data chunk and embedding the chunk in place of the prompt, HyPE transforms retrieval into a question-question matching task, bypassing the need for runtime synthetic answer generation. This approach does not introduce latency but also strengthens the alignment between queries and relevant context. Our experimental results on six common datasets show that HyPE can improve retrieval context precision by up to 42 percentage points and claim recall by up to 45 percentage points, compared to standard approaches, while remaining compatible with re-ranking, multi-vector retrieval, query decomposition, and other RAG advancements

Related papers

• Predictive Prefetching for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [12.088272012448328]
  We propose an advanced asynchronous retrieval framework that enables prefetching aligned with evolving information needs.<n> Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate up to 43.5% end-to-end latency reduction and 62.4% improvement in time-to-first-token.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T07:45:27Z)
• Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines [48.34524144147475]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made query reformulation ubiquitous in modern retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines.<n>We investigate Query Performance Prediction (QPP) as a mechanism for variant selection across ad-hoc retrieval and end-to-end RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-24T15:36:40Z)
• FRESCO: Benchmarking and Optimizing Re-rankers for Evolving Semantic Conflict in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [73.22935457705057]
  We introduce FRESCO, a benchmark for evaluating re-rankers in temporally dynamic contexts.<n>By pairing recency-seeking queries with historical Wikipedia revisions, FRESCO tests whether re-rankers can prioritize factually recent evidence while maintaining semantic relevance.<n>Our evaluation reveals a consistent failure mode across existing re-rankers: a strong bias toward older, semantically rich documents, even when they are factually obsolete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T17:04:25Z)
• Test-Time Strategies for More Efficient and Accurate Agentic RAG [58.44913384057518]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems face challenges with complex, multihop questions.<n>Such approaches can introduce inefficiencies, including repetitive retrieval of previously processed information.<n>We investigate test-time modifications to the Search-R1 pipeline to mitigate these identified shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T19:18:59Z)
• Beyond Relevance: On the Relationship Between Retrieval and RAG Information Coverage [89.58253972744531]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems combine document retrieval with a generative model to address complex information seeking tasks like report generation.<n>We investigate whether upstream retrieval metrics can serve as reliable early indicators of the final generated response's information coverage.<n>Our findings demonstrate strong correlations between coverage-based retrieval metrics and nugget coverage in generated responses at both topic and system levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-09T18:20:20Z)
• Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Robust Multilingual Document Question Answering [0.3376269351435395]
  Large-scale digitization initiatives have unlocked massive collections of historical newspapers.<n>We develop and evaluate a multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline specifically designed for question answering on noisy historical documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T13:57:05Z)
• Query Decomposition for RAG: Balancing Exploration-Exploitation [83.79639293409802]
  RAG systems address complex user requests by decomposing them into subqueries, retrieving potentially relevant documents for each, and then aggregating them to generate an answer.<n>We formulate query decomposition and document retrieval in an exploitation-exploration setting, where retrieving one document at a time builds a belief about the utility of a given sub-queries.<n>Our main finding is that estimating document relevance using rank information and human judgments yields a 35% gain in document-level precision, 15% increase in alpha-nDCG, and better performance on the downstream task of long-form generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T13:37:11Z)
• RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [33.389969814185214]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances recency and factuality in answers.<n>Existing evaluations rarely test how well RAG systems cope with real-world noise, conflicting between internal and external retrieved contexts, or fast-changing facts.<n>We introduce Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation (RARE), a unified framework and large-scale benchmark that jointly stress-test query and document perturbations over dynamic, time-sensitive corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-01T02:42:36Z)
• QuOTE: Question-Oriented Text Embeddings [8.377715521597292]
  QuOTE (Question-Oriented Text Embeddings) is a novel enhancement to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.<n>Unlike traditional RAG pipelines, QuOTE augments chunks with hypothetical questions that the chunk can potentially answer.<n>We demonstrate that QuOTE significantly enhances retrieval accuracy, including in multi-hop question-answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T03:37:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.