Longitudinal Adaptive Experimental Design for Learning Multiple Target Estimands with Semiparametric Efficient Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29421v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:42:37 GMT
• Title: Longitudinal Adaptive Experimental Design for Learning Multiple Target Estimands with Semiparametric Efficient Inference
• Abstract summary: We develop a general semiparametric efficiency framework for designing longitudinal adaptive experiments.<n>An efficiency-oriented design criterion is proposed to accommodate both single-estimand targets and joint optimization across multiple estimands.<n>We show that designs optimized for a particular stage-specific effect can substantially compromise estimation efficiency for effects defined at other stages.
• Score: 0.28456152998360545
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Adaptive designs are increasingly used in clinical trials and digital experiments to improve estimation efficiency by updating treatment randomization probabilities as data accumulate. While most existing work focuses on settings with a single-stage treatment, adaptive designs for longitudinal studies with multi-stage, time-varying treatments remain relatively underexplored. In this work, we develop a general semiparametric efficiency framework for designing longitudinal adaptive experiments to optimize the estimation efficiency of a broad class of target estimands of interest. An efficiency-oriented design criterion is proposed to accommodate both single-estimand targets and joint optimization across multiple estimands. We demonstrate that optimal randomization at earlier stages depends on later-stage allocations, yielding a backward-recursive strategy for deriving the oracle design, and propose a longitudinal adaptive design to sequentially learn and target the oracle design using accumulating data. We further develop an adaptive-design-likelihood-based longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator (ADL-LTMLE) for asymptotically normal and semiparametric efficient estimation of statistical estimands from dependent data collected from adaptive experiments, without relying on parametric model assumptions. Applying the framework to time-to-treatment-initiation effects that compare initiating treatment at a given stage with delaying initiation until a subsequent stage, we show that designs optimized for a particular stage-specific effect can substantially compromise estimation efficiency for effects defined at other stages, highlighting the design trade-offs addressed by our framework. Simulation studies show the proposed design and estimation approaches achieve substantial variance reductions relative to non-adaptive designs, with performance close to that of the oracle design.

Related papers

• Optimal Adaptive Experimental Design for Estimating Treatment Effect [14.088972921434761]
  This paper addresses the fundamental question of determining the optimal accuracy in estimating the treatment effect. By incorporating the concept of doubly robust method into sequential experimental design, we frame the optimal estimation problem as an online bandit learning problem. Using tools and ideas from both bandit algorithm design and adaptive statistical estimation, we propose a general low switching adaptive experiment framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:22:51Z)
• Enhanced Bayesian Optimization via Preferential Modeling of Abstract Properties [49.351577714596544]
  We propose a human-AI collaborative Bayesian framework to incorporate expert preferences about unmeasured abstract properties into surrogate modeling. We provide an efficient strategy that can also handle any incorrect/misleading expert bias in preferential judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T09:23:13Z)
• Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE [56.537164957672715]
  We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z)
• Adaptive Instrument Design for Indirect Experiments [48.815194906471405]
  Unlike RCTs, indirect experiments estimate treatment effects by leveragingconditional instrumental variables. In this paper we take the initial steps towards enhancing sample efficiency for indirect experiments by adaptively designing a data collection policy. Our main contribution is a practical computational procedure that utilizes influence functions to search for an optimal data collection policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T02:38:04Z)
• Variational Sequential Optimal Experimental Design using Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
  vsOED employs a one-point reward formulation with variational posterior approximations, providing a provable lower bound to the expected information gain.<n>We demonstrate vsOED across various engineering and science applications, illustrating its superior sample efficiency compared to existing sequential experimental design algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-17T21:47:19Z)
• Task-specific experimental design for treatment effect estimation [59.879567967089145]
  Large randomised trials (RCTs) are the standard for causal inference. Recent work has proposed more sample-efficient alternatives to RCTs, but these are not adaptable to the downstream application for which the causal effect is sought. We develop a task-specific approach to experimental design and derive sampling strategies customised to particular downstream applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T18:10:37Z)
• Statistically Efficient Bayesian Sequential Experiment Design via Reinforcement Learning with Cross-Entropy Estimators [15.461927416747582]
  Reinforcement learning can learn amortised design policies for designing sequences of experiments. We propose the use of an alternative estimator based on the cross-entropy of the joint model distribution and a flexible proposal distribution. Our method overcomes the exponential-sample complexity of previous approaches and provide more accurate estimates of high EIG values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T00:35:52Z)
• Design Amortization for Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design [70.13948372218849]
  We build off of successful variational approaches, which optimize a parameterized variational model with respect to bounds on the expected information gain (EIG) We present a novel neural architecture that allows experimenters to optimize a single variational model that can estimate the EIG for potentially infinitely many designs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T02:12:34Z)
• Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design [11.414086057582324]
  We introduce Deep Adaptive Design (DAD), a method for amortizing the cost of performing sequential adaptive experiments. We demonstrate that DAD successfully amortizes the process of experimental design, outperforming alternative strategies on a number of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-03T14:43:48Z)
• Optimal Bayesian experimental design for subsurface flow problems [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a novel approach for development of chaos expansion (PCE) surrogate model for the design utility function. This novel technique enables the derivation of a reasonable quality response surface for the targeted objective function with a computational budget comparable to several single-point evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-10T09:42:59Z)
• Efficient Adaptive Experimental Design for Average Treatment Effect Estimation [20.361745967568154]
  We study how to efficiently estimate average treatment effects (ATEs) using adaptive experiments.<n>In adaptive experiments, experimenters sequentially assign treatments to experimental units while updating treatment probabilities based on past data.<n>We develop nonparametric and nonasymptotic confidence intervals that are valid at any round of the proposed design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T02:04:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.