The Grokked Illusion: True Equilibrium Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.29503v1
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2026 15:07:18 GMT
- Title: The Grokked Illusion: True Equilibrium Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting
- Abstract summary: We investigate robustness, the ability to retain the learned knowledge when the model is subsequently trained to acquire new information.<n>We find that AdamW-trained models suffer from catastrophic forgetting, with original task test accuracy dropping from 100% to below 75%.<n>We term this hidden fragility behind apparent generalization the "grokked illusion"
- Score: 10.558597505301611
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While neural networks are typically evaluated by their training and test performance, these metrics do not reveal how robust a learned representation is. Recent studies have shown that solutions occupying larger volumes in parameter space, as quantified by Boltzmann entropy, often exhibit superior generalizability compared to those reached by conventional optimization, a phenomenon known as the high entropy advantage. Here we ask whether this advantage persists beyond generalization. Specifically, we investigate models' robustness, the ability to retain the learned knowledge when the model is subsequently trained to acquire new information. Using grokking in modular arithmetic as a controlled setting, we design a noise injection experiment to evaluate the robustness difference between AdamW-trained transformers and high-entropy model sampled from Wang-Landau Molecular Dynamics with identical saturated performance. By forcing both models to fully remember new data with random labels, we find that AdamW-trained models suffer from catastrophic forgetting, with original task test accuracy dropping from 100% to below 75%, whereas the high-entropy models maintain approximately 95% test accuracy. We term this hidden fragility behind apparent generalization the "grokked illusion." Through singular value decomposition of the neural network weights, we discover that high-entropy neural networks possess significantly higher effective rank in attention and MLP layers both before and after noise injection, indicating richer feature representations can serve as a buffer against catastrophic forgetting. Our findings demonstrate that perfect generalization does not imply equal robustness, offering a new perspective on what makes a trained model robust to interference.
Related papers
- A Classical View on Benign Overfitting: The Role of Sample Size [14.36840959836957]
We focus on almost benign overfitting, where models simultaneously achieve both arbitrarily small training and test errors.<n>This behavior is characteristic of neural networks, which often achieve low (but non-zero) training error while still generalizing well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-16T18:37:51Z) - Rethinking Benign Overfitting in Two-Layer Neural Networks [2.486161976966064]
We refine the feature-noise data model by incorporating class-dependent heterogeneous noise and re-examine the overfitting phenomenon in neural networks.<n>Our findings reveal that neural networks can leverage "data noise" to learn implicit features that improve the classification accuracy for long-tailed data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-17T15:20:04Z) - The Surprising Harmfulness of Benign Overfitting for Adversarial
Robustness [13.120373493503772]
We prove a surprising result that even if the ground truth itself is robust to adversarial examples, the benignly overfitted model is benign in terms of the standard'' out-of-sample risk objective.
Our finding provides theoretical insights into the puzzling phenomenon observed in practice, where the true target function (e.g., human) is robust against adverasrial attack, while beginly overfitted neural networks lead to models that are not robust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T15:40:46Z) - Bias in Pruned Vision Models: In-Depth Analysis and Countermeasures [93.17009514112702]
Pruning, setting a significant subset of the parameters of a neural network to zero, is one of the most popular methods of model compression.
Despite existing evidence for this phenomenon, the relationship between neural network pruning and induced bias is not well-understood.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-25T07:42:06Z) - TWINS: A Fine-Tuning Framework for Improved Transferability of
Adversarial Robustness and Generalization [89.54947228958494]
This paper focuses on the fine-tuning of an adversarially pre-trained model in various classification tasks.
We propose a novel statistics-based approach, Two-WIng NormliSation (TWINS) fine-tuning framework.
TWINS is shown to be effective on a wide range of image classification datasets in terms of both generalization and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-20T14:12:55Z) - The curse of overparametrization in adversarial training: Precise
analysis of robust generalization for random features regression [34.35440701530876]
We show that for adversarially trained random features models, high overparametrization can hurt robust generalization.
Our developed theory reveals the nontrivial effect of overparametrization on robustness and indicates that for adversarially trained random features models, high overparametrization can hurt robust generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-13T18:57:30Z) - MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentation [131.28104376280197]
We study the problem of test time robustification, i.e., using the test input to improve model robustness.
Recent prior works have proposed methods for test time adaptation, however, they each introduce additional assumptions.
We propose a simple approach that can be used in any test setting where the model is probabilistic and adaptable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T17:55:11Z) - Towards an Understanding of Benign Overfitting in Neural Networks [104.2956323934544]
Modern machine learning models often employ a huge number of parameters and are typically optimized to have zero training loss.
We examine how these benign overfitting phenomena occur in a two-layer neural network setting.
We show that it is possible for the two-layer ReLU network interpolator to achieve a near minimax-optimal learning rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-06T19:08:53Z) - Non-Singular Adversarial Robustness of Neural Networks [58.731070632586594]
Adrial robustness has become an emerging challenge for neural network owing to its over-sensitivity to small input perturbations.
We formalize the notion of non-singular adversarial robustness for neural networks through the lens of joint perturbations to data inputs as well as model weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T20:59:30Z) - Firearm Detection via Convolutional Neural Networks: Comparing a
Semantic Segmentation Model Against End-to-End Solutions [68.8204255655161]
Threat detection of weapons and aggressive behavior from live video can be used for rapid detection and prevention of potentially deadly incidents.
One way for achieving this is through the use of artificial intelligence and, in particular, machine learning for image analysis.
We compare a traditional monolithic end-to-end deep learning model and a previously proposed model based on an ensemble of simpler neural networks detecting fire-weapons via semantic segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-17T15:19:29Z) - Provable Benefits of Overparameterization in Model Compression: From
Double Descent to Pruning Neural Networks [38.153825455980645]
Recent empirical evidence indicates that the practice of overization not only benefits training large models, but also assists - perhaps counterintuitively - building lightweight models.
This paper sheds light on these empirical findings by theoretically characterizing the high-dimensional toolsets of model pruning.
We analytically identify regimes in which, even if the location of the most informative features is known, we are better off fitting a large model and then pruning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-16T05:13:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.