Exploring Usability and Legal Practice: Insights from German Judicial Users of Digital Forensics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.00541v1
• Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:54:54 GMT
• Title: Exploring Usability and Legal Practice: Insights from German Judicial Users of Digital Forensics
• Abstract summary: We conceptualize digital forensics as part of a socio-technical system within criminal proceedings.<n>We use a survey of 101 practitioners from the judiciary of the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia.<n>Results indicate a strong demand for improved integration of digital forensics into stakeholder expectations.
• Score: 12.741083730086137
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Digital forensics has become an integral part of modern criminal proceedings, yet its effective integration remains challenging because of increasing data volumes, evolving technologies, and complex interactions between technical and legal stakeholders. Although prior work has focused primarily on digital forensic tools and methods, its broader procedural and organizational context has received limited attention. Building on emerging perspectives inspired by usability research and human-centered security, we conceptualize digital forensics as part of a socio-technical system within criminal proceedings. We consequently investigate this perspective through a survey of 101 practitioners from the judiciary of the German federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia, including public prosecutors, judges, and digital forensic experts. The results indicate a strong demand for improved integration of digital forensics into workflows, enhanced cross-domain communication, and a closer alignment of stakeholder expectations. They also uncover great potential for the improvement of digital forensics usability, e.g., through stronger interdisciplinary cooperation, easier and faster access to evidential data and results, or improvement of stakeholder training and education.

Related papers

• WisdomInterrogatory (LuWen): An Open-Source Legal Large Language Model Technical Report [55.27414605169639]
  We present WisdomInterrogatory (LuWen), an open-source Chinese legal language model built upon the Baichuan foundation model.<n>We evaluate LuWen on five representative legal tasks spanning both prediction and generation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T06:59:07Z)
• A Neuro-Symbolic Multi-Agent Approach to Legal-Cybersecurity Knowledge Integration [53.58687192914018]
  This work provides a first step towards intelligent systems capable of navigating the increasingly intricate cyber-legal domain.<n>We demonstrate promising initial results on multilingual tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T15:46:02Z)
• GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction [60.13483016810707]
  Legal judgment prediction (LJP) has become increasingly important in the legal field.<n>Existing large language models (LLMs) have significant problems of insufficient reasoning due to a lack of legal knowledge.<n>We introduce GLARE, an agentic legal reasoning framework that dynamically acquires key legal knowledge by invoking different modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T13:38:12Z)
• SoK: Advances and Open Problems in Web Tracking [71.54586748169943]
  Web tracking is a pervasive and opaque practice that enables personalized advertising, and conversion tracking.<n>Web tracking is undergoing a once-in-a-generation transformation driven by shifts in the advertising industry, the adoption of anti-tracking countermeasures by browsers, and the growing enforcement of emerging privacy regulations.<n>This Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) aims to consolidate and synthesize this wide-ranging research, offering a comprehensive overview of the technical mechanisms, countermeasures, and regulations that shape the modern and rapidly evolving web tracking landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-16T23:30:54Z)
• Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Improving Digital Forensic Investigation Efficiency [0.1433758865948252]
  The ever-increasing workload of digital forensic labs raises concerns about law enforcement's ability to conduct both cyber-related and non-cyber-related investigations promptly.<n>This article explores the potential and usefulness of integrating Large Language Models into digital forensic investigations to address challenges such as bias, explainability, censorship, resource-intensive infrastructure, and ethical and legal considerations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T17:13:44Z)
• A Comprehensive Analysis of the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Modern Digital Forensics and Incident Response [0.0]
  The goal is to look closely at how AI and ML techniques are used in digital forensics and incident response. This endeavour digs far beneath the surface to unearth the intricate ways AI-driven methodologies are shaping these crucial facets of digital forensics practice. Ultimately, this paper underscores the significance of AI and ML integration in digital forensics, offering insights into their benefits, drawbacks, and broader implications for tackling modern cyber threats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T16:23:53Z)
• Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation [59.15220116166561]
  This work provides the first comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Focusing on biomedical image analysis but with the potential of transfer to other fields, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T14:57:40Z)
• SoK: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence [5.864907136562177]
  The aim of this article is to analyse the current state of practice of cross-border investigations. We recall all the challenges raised in the literature and discuss them from a more practical yet global perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T17:03:38Z)
• An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
  We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago. We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z)
• SoK: Blockchain Solutions for Forensics [8.185918509343818]
  This paper provides an overview and classification of the available blockchain-based digital forensic tools. We also offer an analysis of the various benefits and challenges of the symbiotic relationship between blockchain technology and the current digital forensics approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T11:43:04Z)
• How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
  Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.