When Words Divide: Diachronic Ideological Polarization in Political Discourse on Social Media

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01176v2
• Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 15:00:04 GMT
• Title: When Words Divide: Diachronic Ideological Polarization in Political Discourse on Social Media
• Abstract summary: We present a longitudinal analysis of ideological polarization in Reddit discussions.<n>We quantify ideological polarization as the semantic divergence of political concepts over time.<n>Our analysis shows that ideological polarization has increased substantially during the study period.
• Score: 4.907551775445731
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Political polarization has become a defining feature of online discourse, yet its long-term evolution remains poorly understood. We present a longitudinal analysis of ideological polarization in Reddit discussions by measuring semantic differences in the language used by opposing political communities. We construct temporally aligned community-specific word embeddings and quantify ideological polarization as the semantic divergence of political concepts over time. Our analysis shows that ideological polarization has increased substantially during the study period, both at the concept- and topic-level. Unlike prior computational work, which has largely focused on cross-sectional analyses or affective dimensions of polarization at a single point at time, our approach captures the evolution of ideological differences in semantic framing. The proposed framework provides a scalable method for studying the temporal dynamics of ideological polarization in large-scale social media discourse.

Related papers

• Against Political Polarization: A Unified Framework for Tracing Evolving Political Ideologies on Social Media [17.163713154720806]
  TSN4PI is a unified framework for tracking the evolution of political ideologies on social media.<n>The PIDN uses large language models with style transfer and unsupervised domain adaptation to enable robust ideology detection.<n>The PIPN employs temporal graph neural networks to predict future ideological shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-18T16:33:32Z)
• Strategies for preventing and reversing polarized online discourse [41.99844472131922]
  Political polarization poses a variety of challenges for modern democracies.<n>Finding ways to promote constructive discourse while maintaining free expression has proved a challenge for social media platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T17:52:19Z)
• Measuring Social Media Polarization Using Large Language Models and Heuristic Rules [0.0]
  This study systematically analyze and quantify affective polarization in discussions on divisive topics such as climate change and gun control.<n>By combining AI-driven content annotation with domain-informed scoring, our framework offers a scalable and interpretable approach to measuring affective polarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T01:11:58Z)
• Unveiling Affective Polarization Trends in Parliamentary Proceedings [6.373171949526166]
  Using measures of Valence, Arousal and Dominance, we detect signals of emotional discourse.<n>We find that the emotional style of members of government differs from that of opposition members.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T20:13:43Z)
• Latent Topic Synthesis: Leveraging LLMs for Electoral Ad Analysis [51.95395936342771]
  We introduce an end-to-end framework for automatically generating an interpretable topic taxonomy from an unlabeled corpus.<n>We apply this framework to a large corpus of Meta political ads from the month ahead of the 2024 U.S. Presidential election.<n>Our approach uncovers latent discourse structures, synthesizes semantically rich topic labels, and annotates topics with moral framing dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T20:30:20Z)
• A Survey on Stereotype Detection in Natural Language Processing [46.27245894098319]
  Stereotypes influence social perceptions and can escalate into discrimination and violence.<n>This work is presented a survey of existing research, analyzing definitions from psychology, sociology, and philosophy.<n>Findings emphasize stereotype detection as a potential early-monitoring tool to prevent bias escalation and the rise of hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T09:03:56Z)
• Talking Point based Ideological Discourse Analysis in News Events [62.18747509565779]
  We propose a framework motivated by the theory of ideological discourse analysis to analyze news articles related to real-world events.<n>Our framework represents the news articles using a relational structure - talking points, which captures the interaction between entities, their roles, and media frames along with a topic of discussion.<n>We evaluate our framework's ability to generate these perspectives through automated tasks - ideology and partisan classification tasks, supplemented by human validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T02:52:34Z)
• Quantifying Polarization: A Comparative Study of Measures and Methods [2.0249250133493195]
  Political polarization, a key driver of social fragmentation, has drawn increasing attention for its role in shaping online and offline discourse.<n>This study evaluates five widely used polarization measures, testing their strengths and weaknesses with synthetic datasets.<n>We present a novel adaptation of Kleinberg's burst detection algorithm to improve mode detection in polarized distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-13T16:43:23Z)
• Political-LLM: Large Language Models in Political Science [159.95299889946637]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely adopted in political science tasks.<n>Political-LLM aims to advance the comprehensive understanding of integrating LLMs into computational political science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T08:47:50Z)
• Inducing Political Bias Allows Language Models Anticipate Partisan Reactions to Controversies [5.958974943807783]
  This study addresses the challenge of understanding political bias in digitized discourse using Large Language Models (LLMs) We present a comprehensive analytical framework, consisting of Partisan Bias Divergence Assessment and Partisan Class Tendency Prediction. Our findings reveal the model's effectiveness in capturing emotional and moral nuances, albeit with some challenges in stance detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:57:53Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Social media polarization reflects shifting political alliances in Pakistan [44.99833362998488]
  Spanning from 2018 to 2022, our analysis of Twitter data allows us to capture pivotal shifts and developments in Pakistan's political arena. By examining interactions and content generated by politicians affiliated with major political parties, we reveal a consistent and active presence of politicians on Twitter. Our analysis also uncovers significant shifts in political affiliations, including the transition of politicians to the opposition alliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T00:07:48Z)
• Political Ideology and Polarization of Policy Positions: A Multi-dimensional Approach [19.435030285532854]
  We study the ideology of the policy under discussion teasing apart the nuanced co-existence of stance and ideology. Aligned with the theoretical accounts in political science, we treat ideology as a multi-dimensional construct. We showcase that this framework enables quantitative analysis of polarization, a temporal, multifaceted measure of ideological distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T04:03:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.