Cognitive Demand Steering for Adaptive Meta-Reasoning in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01319v1
• Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:41:12 GMT
• Title: Cognitive Demand Steering for Adaptive Meta-Reasoning in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: Cognitive Demand Steering is a training-free meta-reasoning framework equipped with residual demand assessment.<n>Averaged across three frontier LLMs and six reasoning benchmarks, CDS improves accuracy by $21.9%$ over direct calls and $9%$ over standard CoT reasoning.
• Score: 12.235165912578095
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent meta-reasoning frameworks improve LLM reasoning by wrapping chain-of-thought generation in an iterative control loop, allowing more effective backtracking, termination of reasoning loops, and injection of promising reasoning patterns, among other strategy adjustments. Despite promising results, methods often rely on backward-looking reward functions, utilize coarse search actions, or require additional reasoning controller training requiring many-shot supervision. We introduce Cognitive Demand Steering (CDS), a training-free meta-reasoning framework equipped with residual demand assessment: at each step, an LLM-based progress evaluator characterizes the residual reasoning required to arrive at a solution rather than merely evaluating the previous step. This allows a meta-controller to select reasoning interventions comprising both general-purpose exemplars and actions (e.g., general guidance for quantitative reasoning) that directly tackle this forward-looking demand signal. This shift eliminates the need for any trained component while enabling zero-shot transfer across models and tasks with no adaptation. Rather than relying on coarse characterizations, we employ cognitive scales to both design interventions as well as profile initial problem complexity and residual demand signal over 16 dimensions motivated by cognitive science (e.g., attention and scan, learning and abstraction, spatio-physical reasoning), giving the controller a fine-grained vocabulary for diagnosing. Averaged across three frontier LLMs and six reasoning benchmarks, CDS improves accuracy by $21.9\%$ over direct calls and $9\%$ over standard CoT reasoning, with the largest gains on difficult mathematics and coding tasks.

Related papers

• CARE: Competence-Aware Reward Shaping for Adaptive Reasoning Length in Video-MLLMs [50.189987475377656]
  We propose CARE, a competence-aware reward shaping framework for adaptive reasoning length optimization in multimodal reasoning.<n> CARE maintains a smoothed competence estimate via an exponential moving average of pass rates, and uses it to route training into progressive stages.<n>Experiments on multiple video reasoning and general video understanding benchmarks demonstrate that CARE consistently improves reasoning accuracy, stabilizes reinforcement learning, and significantly enhances token efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T08:28:26Z)
• Stop When Further Reasoning Won't Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning Models [11.158010513386666]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) can solve complex problems through explicit chain-of-thought reasoning processes.<n>LRMs often suffer from overthinking, resulting in redundant token outputs and degraded accuracy.<n>We propose ASAG, which infers the model's reasoning state and adaptively adjusts the generation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-13T02:58:29Z)
• Metacognition as Reward: Reinforcing LLM Reasoning via Knowledge and Regulation Signals [75.25256166997414]
  We introduce Metacognition-as-Reward (MaR), a metacognition-inspired RL framework.<n>MaR guides reasoning through two general process dimensions.<n>MaR consistently improves model performance, achieving up to a 7.7% gain over the base model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T08:54:37Z)
• TRACES: Tagging Reasoning Steps for Adaptive Cost-Efficient Early-Stopping [5.190961793309368]
  We introduce TRACES, a lightweight framework that tags reasoning steps in real-time.<n>We find that LRMs tend to shift their reasoning behavior after reaching a correct answer.<n>We demonstrate that the monitoring of the specific type of steps can produce effective interpretable early stopping criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-22T20:00:18Z)
• ProRAG: Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [54.071574153853994]
  ProRAG is a process-supervised reinforcement learning framework designed to integrate learned step-level supervision into the online optimization loop.<n>Our framework consists of four stages: (1) Supervised Policy Warmup to initialize the model with a structured reasoning format; (2) construction of an MCTS-based Process Reward Model (PRM) to quantify intermediate reasoning quality; (3) PRM-Guided Reasoning Refinement to align the policy with fine-grained process preferences; and (4) Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning with a dual-granularity advantage mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T16:04:59Z)
• Structured Reasoning for Large Language Models [59.215789462977206]
  We propose Structured Reasoning (SCR), a framework that decouples reasoning trajectories into explicit, evaluable, and trainable components.<n>SCR substantially improves reasoning efficiency and self-verification.<n>Compared with existing reasoning paradigms, it reduces output token length by up to 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T04:04:01Z)
• In-Token Rationality Optimization: Towards Accurate and Concise LLM Reasoning via Self-Feedback [38.915062716409686]
  InTRO is a new framework that enables both token-level exploration and self-feedback for accurate and concise reasoning.<n>InTRO consistently outperforms other baselines, raising solution accuracy by up to 20% relative to the base model.<n>Its chains of thought are notably more concise, exhibiting reduced verbosity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T01:47:06Z)
• From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization [62.07990937720985]
  Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM) is a new supervision framework for Large Language Models.<n>DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions.<n> Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T14:29:15Z)
• SmartThinker: Learning to Compress and Preserve Reasoning by Step-Level Length Control [5.224609066309358]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities through inference-time scaling.<n>Previous work has attempted to mitigate this issue by penalizing the overall length of generated samples during reinforcement learning.<n>We propose SmartThinker, a two-stage learnable framework designed to enable fine-grained control over the length of reasoning chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T11:21:47Z)
• The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models [69.798277882245]
  We introduce Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning (UPFT) to enhance large language models' reasoning efficiency.<n>UPFT removes the need for labeled data or exhaustive sampling.<n> Experiments show that UPFT matches the performance of supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:56:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.