ProRAG: Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21912v1
• Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 16:04:59 GMT
• Title: ProRAG: Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Authors: Zhao Wang, Ziliang Zhao, Zhicheng Dou,
• Abstract summary: ProRAG is a process-supervised reinforcement learning framework designed to integrate learned step-level supervision into the online optimization loop.<n>Our framework consists of four stages: (1) Supervised Policy Warmup to initialize the model with a structured reasoning format; (2) construction of an MCTS-based Process Reward Model (PRM) to quantify intermediate reasoning quality; (3) PRM-Guided Reasoning Refinement to align the policy with fine-grained process preferences; and (4) Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning with a dual-granularity advantage mechanism.
• Score: 54.071574153853994
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a promising paradigm for optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) in complex reasoning tasks. However, traditional outcome-based RL approaches often suffer from reward sparsity and inefficient credit assignment, as coarse-grained scalar rewards fail to identify specific erroneous steps within long-horizon trajectories. This ambiguity frequently leads to "process hallucinations", where models reach correct answers through flawed logic or redundant retrieval steps. Although recent process-aware approaches attempt to mitigate this via static preference learning or heuristic reward shaping, they often lack the on-policy exploration capabilities required to decouple step-level credit from global outcomes. To address these challenges, we propose ProRAG, a process-supervised reinforcement learning framework designed to integrate learned step-level supervision into the online optimization loop. Our framework consists of four stages: (1) Supervised Policy Warmup to initialize the model with a structured reasoning format; (2) construction of an MCTS-based Process Reward Model (PRM) to quantify intermediate reasoning quality; (3) PRM-Guided Reasoning Refinement to align the policy with fine-grained process preferences; and (4) Process-Supervised Reinforcement Learning with a dual-granularity advantage mechanism. By aggregating step-level process rewards with global outcome signals, ProRAG provides precise feedback for every action. Extensive experiments on five multi-hop reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that ProRAG achieves superior overall performance compared to strong outcome-based and process-aware RL baselines, particularly on complex long-horizon tasks, validating the effectiveness of fine-grained process supervision. The code and model are available at https://github.com/lilinwz/ProRAG.

Related papers

• Search-R2: Enhancing Search-Integrated Reasoning via Actor-Refiner Collaboration [49.9937230730202]
  We propose Search-R2, a novel Actor-Refiner collaboration framework that enhances reasoning through targeted intervention.<n>Our approach decomposes the generation process into an Actor, which produces initial reasoning trajectories.<n>We show that Search-R2 consistently outperforms strong RAG and RL-based baselines across model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T15:32:09Z)
• Sample-Efficient Neurosymbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning [49.60927398960061]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic Deep RL approach that integrates background symbolic knowledge to improve sample efficiency.<n>Online reasoning is performed to guide the training process through two mechanisms.<n>We show improved performance over a state-of-the-art reward machine baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T09:28:53Z)
• PROPA: Toward Process-level Optimization in Visual Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning [30.44007644340425]
  We introduce PROPA, a novel framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with GRPO to generate dense, process-level rewards and optimize reasoning at each intermediate step without human annotations.<n>Across seven benchmarks and four VLM backbones, PROPA consistently outperforms both SFT- and RLVR-based baselines.<n>It achieves up to 17.0% gains on in-domain tasks and 21.0% gains on out-of-domain tasks compared to existing state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T13:06:12Z)
• Hybrid Reward Normalization for Process-supervised Non-verifiable Agentic Tasks [12.31210445905605]
  We introduce Principle Process Reward (PPR), an RL approach that unifies step-level assessment and outcome verification.<n>PPR achieves state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of benchmarks, demonstrating its impressive robustness and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T23:44:55Z)
• StepORLM: A Self-Evolving Framework With Generative Process Supervision For Operations Research Language Models [18.500046072165254]
  We introduce StepORLM, a novel self-evolving framework with generative process supervision.<n>At its core, StepORLM features a co-evolutionary loop where a policy model and a generative process reward model (GenPRM) iteratively improve on each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:39:10Z)
• Agentic Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Step Rewards [92.26560379363492]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly developed as autonomous agents using reinforcement learning (agentic RL)<n>We introduce implicit step rewards for agentic RL (iStar), a general credit-assignment strategy that integrates seamlessly with standard RL algorithms.<n>We evaluate our method on three challenging agent benchmarks, including WebShop and VisualSokoban, as well as open-ended social interactions with unverifiable rewards in SOTOPIA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T16:15:42Z)
• GRPO-CARE: Consistency-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Reasoning [53.894789613838654]
  We introduce SEED-Bench-R1, a benchmark with complex real-world videos requiring balanced perception and reasoning.<n>Using SEED-Bench-R1, we find that standard GRPO, while improving answer accuracy, often reduces logical coherence between reasoning steps and answers, with only a 57.9% consistency rate.<n>We propose GRPO-CARE, a consistency-aware RL framework optimizing both answer correctness and reasoning coherence without explicit supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T08:49:13Z)
• Reinforced Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation [92.56166822197919]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks.<n>Existing methods typically rely on fine-tuning with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>In this work, we explore an alternative approach that shifts from explicit CoT reasoning to compact, information-dense latent reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T11:03:45Z)
• Process vs. Outcome Reward: Which is Better for Agentic RAG Reinforcement Learning [45.10424242207931]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the text generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We introduce a novel method ReasonRAG that automatically constructs RAG-ProGuide, a high-quality dataset providing process-level rewards for query generation, evidence extraction, and answer generation.<n>With the process-level policy optimization, the proposed framework empowers LLMs to autonomously invoke search, generate queries, extract relevant evidence, and produce final answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T08:21:00Z)
• Reinforcing Multi-Turn Reasoning in LLM Agents via Turn-Level Reward Design [35.544075583073685]
  We present the first systematic study of textitturn-level reward design for multi-turn RL algorithms and agent applications.<n>We conduct case studies on multi-turn reasoning-augmented search agents, where we carefully design two types of turn-level rewards: verifiable and LLM-as-judge.<n>Our experiments on multi-turn search tasks demonstrate that incorporating well-designed turn-level rewards enables RL algorithms to significantly outperform baseline methods with trajectory-level rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T04:09:46Z)
• Learning Planning-based Reasoning by Trajectories Collection and Process Reward Synthesizing [61.98556945939045]
  We propose a framework to learn planning-based reasoning through Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) on collected trajectories. Our results on challenging logical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T15:18:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.