MRAFnd: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Zero-Shot Fake News Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01430v1
- Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 18:21:15 GMT
- Title: MRAFnd: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Framework for Zero-Shot Fake News Detection
- Abstract summary: We introduce textbfMRAFnd, a novel framework for detecting fabricated news in zero-shot scenarios.<n>MRAFnd emulates a collaborative team of analysts to verify news veracity.<n> Comprehensive experiments on three benchmark datasets reveal that MRAFnd markedly surpasses state-of-the-art baselines.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid dissemination of multimodal content has intensified the spread of fabricated news, presenting a substantial threat to social integrity. A formidable challenge for current detection systems is identifying misinformation related to novel events in zero-shot scenarios. Prevailing zero-shot methods typically assess news items in isolation via semantic matching, a strategy that fails to recognize the recycled disinformation tactics from past campaigns and lacks the sophisticated reasoning needed to identify subtle, cross-modal discrepancies. To surmount these deficiencies, we introduce \textbf{MRAFnd}, a novel \underline{\textbf{M}}ultimodal \underline{\textbf{R}}etrieval-\underline{\textbf{A}}ugmented Framework for Zero-Shot \underline{\textbf{F}}ake \underline{\textbf{N}}ews \underline{\textbf{D}}etection. MRAFnd emulates a collaborative team of analysts to verify news veracity. The framework initiates with \textbf{Multimodal Similarity-based News Retrieval} to assemble a corpus of contextually analogous articles from an unlabeled reference database. Subsequently, during the \textbf{Bifurcated Evidential Reasoning} stage, agents perform a dual-directional analysis to extract critical patterns from the retrieved evidence. Finally, a \textbf{Multi-Agent Collaborative Debate}, involving Analyst and Arbiter agents, engages in a structured discourse to arrive at a definitive and robust conclusion. Comprehensive experiments on three benchmark datasets reveal that MRAFnd markedly surpasses state-of-the-art baselines, achieving an accuracy gain of up to 2.35\% on the demanding Weibo-21 dataset.
Related papers
- Let the Bullets Fly: Multimodal Fake News Detection with Temporal-Aligned Generative Danmaku [11.425128043674958]
textitDanmaku (a.k.a., bullet comments) provides fine-grained discriminative social signals that can benefit fake news detection.<n>The inherent accumulation latency of textitDanmaku in real-world scenarios violates the real-time necessity of fake news detection.<n>We propose a temporal-aware user interactive process by proposing a novel temporal textbfGenerative textbfdanmaku framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-24T05:50:12Z) - Achieving Text-based Person Retrieval with Any Granularity [80.69427598925718]
This paper introduces a new paradigm, Text-based Person Retrieval with Any Granularity.<n>We formalize a five-level granularity spectrum and construct UFine6926-MG, a high-quality multi-grained annotated dataset.<n>We then propose the Cross-modal Multi-grained Aligning and Matching framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-23T08:42:25Z) - Towards Verifiable Multimodal Deep Research: A Multi-Agent Harness for Interleaved Report Generation [74.0621258662676]
We propose Ptah, a multi-agent harness for interleaved report generation.<n>Ptah orchestrates the lifecycle from user query to rendered web report through planning, research, and writing stages.<n>A verifier agent serves as the harness's acceptance function, enforcing factual grounding, citation fidelity, and cross-modal consistency throughout the workflow.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T12:40:34Z) - DecepGPT: Schema-Driven Deception Detection with Multicultural Datasets and Robust Multimodal Learning [64.33887406863899]
Multimodal deception detection aims to identify deceptive behavior by analyzing audiovisual cues for forensics and security.<n>Existing benchmarks provide only binary labels without intermediate reasoning cues.<n>We construct reasoning datasets with structured cue-level descriptions and reasoning chains.<n>With 1695 samples, it is the largest non-laboratory deception detection dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-25T04:06:36Z) - OMG-Agent: Toward Robust Missing Modality Generation with Decoupled Coarse-to-Fine Agentic Workflows [9.617220633655716]
We present textbfunderlineOmni-textbfunderlineModality textbfunderlineGeneration Agent (textbfOMG-Agent)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T02:25:40Z) - DIVER: Dynamic Iterative Visual Evidence Reasoning for Multimodal Fake News Detection [6.225860651499494]
Multimodal fake news detection is crucial for mitigating adversarial misinformation.<n>We propose DIVER (Dynamic Iterative Visual Evidence Reasoning), a framework grounded in a progressive, evidence-driven reasoning paradigm.<n>Experiments on Weibo, Weibo21, and GossipCop demonstrate that DIVER outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by an average of 2.72%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T04:01:33Z) - WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research [73.58638285105971]
This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T17:57:21Z) - Beyond Artificial Misalignment: Detecting and Grounding Semantic-Coordinated Multimodal Manipulations [56.816929931908824]
We pioneer the detection of semantically-coordinated manipulations in multimodal data.<n>We propose a Retrieval-Augmented Manipulation Detection and Grounding (RamDG) framework.<n>Our framework significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving 2.06% higher detection accuracy on SAMM compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-16T04:18:48Z) - CAMF: Collaborative Adversarial Multi-agent Framework for Machine Generated Text Detection [16.113113157328662]
Existing zero-shot detection paradigms often exhibit significant deficiencies.<n>We introduce textbfCAMF, a novel architecture using multiple LLM-based agents.<n>This structured collaborative-adversarial process enables a deep analysis of subtle, cross-dimensional textual incongruities indicative of non-human origin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-16T06:25:27Z) - ContextGuard-LVLM: Enhancing News Veracity through Fine-grained Cross-modal Contextual Consistency Verification [2.012425476229879]
Traditional approaches fall short in addressing the fine-grained cross-modal contextual consistency problem.<n>We propose ContextGuard-LVLM, a novel framework built upon advanced Vision-Language Large Models.<n>Our model is uniquely enhanced through reinforced or adversarial learning paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-08T18:10:24Z) - METER: Multi-modal Evidence-based Thinking and Explainable Reasoning -- Algorithm and Benchmark [48.78602579128459]
We introduce METER, a unified benchmark for interpretable forgery detection spanning images, videos, audio, and audio-visual content.<n>Our dataset comprises four tracks, each requiring not only real-vs-fake classification but also evidence-chain-based explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-22T03:42:51Z) - Robust Saliency-Aware Distillation for Few-shot Fine-grained Visual
Recognition [57.08108545219043]
Recognizing novel sub-categories with scarce samples is an essential and challenging research topic in computer vision.
Existing literature addresses this challenge by employing local-based representation approaches.
This article proposes a novel model, Robust Saliency-aware Distillation (RSaD), for few-shot fine-grained visual recognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T00:13:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.